1953 Blue And Black 5 Window Pickup Truck on 2040-cars
Stevensville, Michigan, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:350 .30 over
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Black
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Other Pickups
Trim: 5 Window
Drive Type: rear wheel
Mileage: 100
Sub Model: 3100
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Exterior Color: Blue and Black
item location: Stevensville Michigan
1953 Chevy Pickup Truck. Blue with Matte Black. The motor is a 1998 vortec 350 bored.30 over. comp cam extreme roller hydrolic cam. Brand new exhaust with flow masters. Less than 100 miles on the rebuild. Carburetor is a holly 650 double pumper. Transmission is a turbo 350 with a 2400 stall and less than 10 miles on the rebuild, Mustang 2 front end. Rear end is a 10 bolt out of a chevy nova. All new phantom gauges. Truck bed is Rhino lined. Truck is bagged with 7 inches of lift. Has shaved handles. Remote door poppers and brand new bluetooth Alpine stereo. I am a first time seller so if I have missed anything please email or call me at anytime. 269-470-9467 rsantaniello@sbcglobal.net
Chevrolet Other Pickups for Sale
- 1984 m1008 cucv chevrolet k30
- 1949 chevy pickup truck 5 window deluxe sun baked paint 1/2 ton rat rod(US $4,800.00)
- Rare 4-wheel drive!factory a/c(US $18,900.00)
- 35 chevrolet(US $27,995.00)
- Wonderful rare 5 window farm truck and great driver! watch video!(US $10,900.00)
- 1970 chevy c-20 3/4 ton pick up truck one owner original long wheel base camper(US $7,500.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Winners Auto & Cycle ★★★★★
Westborn Auto Service ★★★★★
Weber Transmission Company ★★★★★
Vaneck Auto Body ★★★★★
US Wheel Exchange ★★★★★
U Name IT Auto ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy might've pulled out of NASCAR if it weren't for new Gen 6 car
Wed, 20 Feb 2013We've been on the fence with NASCAR for some time now. On one hand, it's some of the closest racing anywhere in motorsports, with actual passing and door-handle-to-door-handle action as a matter of course. But on the other, it's become template racing - a personality-driven sport more about the drivers than any sort of loyalty to a particular automaker. The Car Of Tomorrow format really rammed that message home, with a racecar's identity coming down to little more than headlamp stickers slapped on the nose. That's not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, but we've wondered for some time what's in it for the automakers, who pay big money to stay in a series that has had little increasingly little do with street car sales, let alone innovation.
Apparently General Motors was beginning to wonder the same thing. In a new ESPN report, Rick Hendrick, team owner of Hendrick Motorsports, suggests that GM would have seriously considered leaving NASCAR if it wasn't for the move away from the COT to the new Gen 6 racer. According to Hendrick, GM North America boss Mark Reuss spearheaded the charge away from the 2007 COT and toward a racecar with clearer automaker ties - cars like the new Chevrolet SS racer shown above. Learn more about the fight for a closer-to-production look in the ESPN story at the link.
Now, if we could just get more rear-wheel drive V8 coupes into showrooms....
Autoblog's top 50 car photos of 2016
Fri, Dec 30 2016This one shouldn't need much explanation. We like cars a whole lot, and that includes not just driving them but taking great pictures of them. We've collected our 50 favorite images from this year in the mega-gallery above. It's a mix of old and new, with a healthy dose of vintage and modern race cars mixed in, and not one single shot under the harsh lights of an auto show. So click through and enjoy. Featured Gallery Autoblog's Top 50 Photos of 2016 View 50 Photos Image Credit: Copyright 2016 Autoblog.com Audi BMW Chevrolet Dodge Ferrari Ford Lamborghini Mazda McLaren Mercedes-Benz Porsche Rolls-Royce Volvo Convertible Coupe Motorcycle Luxury Racing Vehicles Performance Supercars Classics
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.