Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Chevrolet Nova Standard on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:1974 Mileage:100000 Color: Silver
Location:

Pleasant Lake, Indiana, United States

Pleasant Lake, Indiana, United States

I have owned this car for 11 years, I am not a flipper. This car has been my baby and treated like one. I have restored it twice and lets start with what I did eleven years ago:Floor pans wire brushed and replaced one patch panel passenger side rear. Sprayed with rush inhibitor and put sound proofing in and new carpetTrunk did not have any holes. Wire brushed and sprayed rust inhibitor and put sound proofing in. I was going to put carpet in but never didNew leaf springs and bushings and front rear shocksWire brushed frame and painted New radiatorNew quarter panels What I have done between then and two years ago:New coy wheelsRebuilt transmissionHeadlinerChanged fluid in rear endNew CD player/radioOil pressure gauge and water gaugeReupholstered front seatNew 350 Chevy crate motor from Jegs ( currently has about 4000 miles on motor ) Two years ago to present day:New paint Job (very nice, no orange peel with lots of wet sanding!)New door pins and bushingsNew dash padNew door panels still in the boxNew battery Shaved rear bumper and took out filler stripTook off rubber bummer stops in the front bumper and filled in all holes. (Both bumpers give the car a much better look now)Heater, all gauges, turn signals, break lights, running lights, all workNew door handles, door locks, and weather striping. New bezels FlawsSomething drains battery if car sits for more then 4-5 days. I have never tried to locate it because I don't drive it everyday. I put a quick disconnect on battery but it hasn't been an issue for meThere are two rubber pieces that run under the front bumper, the paint is cracking on those.I do not roll down the back windows because when I restored it two years ago there was a quarter glass run channel that they do not make for a 74 Nova. I took out run channel and put weather stripping in. I was not trying to cut corners, they just don't make this for this car! I will guarantee I have twice as much in this car as I am selling it for. The only reason that I am even selling is that I built a Rat Rod (1 year ago) and I just don't drive it anymore. This is not a perfect car or a show car but a very, very nice driver that turns a lot of heads. I have gotten a lot of complements on it over the years. Any questions feel free to call me or text me. (812)584-1902. Thank You

Auto Services in Indiana

West Side Auto Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 125 York St, Howe
Phone: (517) 369-9149

V R Auto Repairs ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 107 S Lafayette St, Orestes
Phone: (765) 754-8440

Tri State Battery Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Battery Storage
Address: 48 Doughty Rd, Guilford
Phone: (812) 537-2500

Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2404 N Smith Pike, Owensburg
Phone: (812) 339-1873

Stanfa Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 16220 Prince Dr, Munster
Phone: (708) 596-9292

Speed Shop Motorsports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Recreational Vehicles & Campers
Address: 704 Main St, Forest
Phone: (765) 249-5422

Auto blog

Chevy Volt replacement battery cost varies wildly, up to $34,000

Fri, Jan 10 2014

There's a growing hubbub in the plug-in vehicle community over what looks like some ridiculously cheap replacement batteries for the Chevrolet Volt going up for sale. GM Parts Online, for example, is selling a replacement Volt battery with an MSRP of $2,994.64 but, with an online discount, the price comes down to $2,305.88. For the 16-kWh pack in the 2012 Volt, that comes to a very low $144.11 per kilowatt hour (kWH). But is it a real deal? How can it be, when a Chevy dealer may quote you a price of up to $34,000 to replace the pack? For a 16-kWh Volt pack, $2,305.88 comes to a very low $144.11 per kWh. But is it a real deal? Battery packs in alternative propulsion vehicles are usually priced by the kWh and, historically, they've been thought to be in the range of $500-per-kWh for OEM offerings. Since automakers are understandably secretive about their costs, we still don't know what the real number is today, but we do know it varies by automaker. Tesla, for example, has said it pays less than $200-per-kWH at the cell level but, of course, a constructed pack would be more. Whatever is going on, li-ion battery prices are trending downward. So, $144.11 certainly sounds great, but what's the story here? Kevin Kelly, manager of electrification technology communications for General Motors, reminded AutoblogGreen that GM Parts Online is not the official GM parts website and that, "the costs indicated on the site are not what we would charge our dealers or owners for a replacement battery. There would be no cost to the Volt owner if their battery needs replacement or repair while the battery is under the eight year/100,000 mile limited warranty coverage provided by Chevrolet." A single price tag also can't be accurate for everyone, Kelly said. "If the customer needs to have their battery repaired beyond the warranty, the cost to them would vary depending on what needs to be replaced or repaired (i.e. number of modules, which specific internal components need replacement, etc.)." he said. "So, it's hard for us to tell you exactly what the cost would be to the customer because it varies depending on what might need to be repaired/replaced. As a result, the core charge would vary." But, is the $2,300 price even accurate for anyone? Thanks to a reader comment, we see that this similar item on New GM Parts makes it look like the lithium-ion modules that Kelly mentioned – where a lot of the expensive bits are – are not included.

Sunday Drive: Taking a gaze into the automotive crystal ball

Sun, Oct 22 2017

Mankind has long been fascinated by the future. So it makes sense that this past week's top stories were all about cars, trucks, and SUVs that won't be hitting the market until the 2019 model year. And right at the top of the list is the Ram 1500. We've come to know Ram as the truck maker that styles its pickups with cues cribbed from big rigs, but that look has slowly evolved over time into something uniquely its own. The next Ram 1500 continues this trend, with a newly refined look that we can't wait to see in person. Up next is the 2019 Chevy Silverado. Pickup trucks have been, continue to be, and will remain the best-selling vehicles in America. And General Motors is a leader in the field, with two distinct offerings with which to entice buyers, one from the bread-and-butter Chevrolet brand and one wearing the slightly more upscale GMC badge. The Chevy looks to get LED lighting elements for 2019, which ought to keep the truck from looking dated when compared to the Ford F-150 and the previously mentioned Ram 1500. From there we move past pickup trucks and into SUVs and sedans. The 2019 Jeep Cherokee looks to get toned down a bit with its next refresh, and the '19 BMW 3 Series continues its slow evolutionary journey at the top of its aspirational sales pedestal. Finally, spy shots give way to official production reveals for the 2019 Audi A7 and Polestar 1. This pair of European luxury cars won't compete with one another – one is a rakish hatchback and the other a sports coupe – any further than for the eyeballs of our readers, but both proved popular enough to merit inclusion in our weekly roundup. As always, tune in to Autoblog next week for a front-row seat to all the happenings worth following in the automotive industry. 2019 Ram 1500 spotted without the classic crosshairs 2019 Chevy Silverado spied with new LED accents 2019 Jeep Cherokee reveals a much more normal face 2019 BMW 3 Series spy shots reveal production lights, new interior details 2019 Audi A7 revealed: More torque, refined styling Polestar 1 First Look | The 600 horsepower hybrid Scandinavian Green Audi BMW Chevrolet Jeep RAM Volvo Truck Hatchback SUV Future Vehicles Hybrid Luxury Performance Sedan sunday drive polestar 1

GM is the latest automaker accused of diesel emissions cheating

Thu, May 25 2017

Volkswagen and Ram need to make room on the diesel-emissions bench for General Motors. America's largest automaker was accused in a lawsuit on Thursday of rigging hundreds of thousands of diesel trucks with at least three so-called defeat devices to ensure that the trucks would meet federal and state emission standards, even if they generated more pollution in real-world driving. According to the complaint, on-road emissions testing conducted for the plaintiffs found that Duramax-equipped trucks produced NOx pollutants, comprised of nitrogen and oxygen atoms, two to five times higher than legally permitted, and "many times" higher than their gasoline counterparts. The proposed class-action lawsuit was filed in federal court in Detroit on behalf of people who own or lease more than 705,000 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup trucks fitted with "Duramax" engines from 2011 to 2016 model years. The lawsuit seeks remedies including possible refunds or restitution for lost vehicle value, plus punitive damages. It adds to legal problems for Detroit-based GM, which has already paid about $2.5 billion in penalties and settlements over faulty ignition switches linked to 124 deaths. GM joins at least five automakers whose diesel emissions have been scrutinized by regulators or consumers. They include VW, which has admitted to cheating; Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Peugeot and Renault. GM spokesman Dan Flores called the claims "baseless," and said the trucks comply with US Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards and California's own tough standards. Shares of GM were down 69 cents, or 2.1 percent, at $32.50 in afternoon trading, after earlier falling to $31.93. The GM lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, which helped reach multibillion-dollar settlements with VW on behalf of drivers and dealers. The case is Fenner et al v General Motors LLC et al, US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, No. 17-11661. The named plaintiffs are Andrei Fenner of Mountain View, California and Joshua Herman of Sulphur, Louisiana. They said they would not have bought their respective 2011 Sierra and 2016 Silverado trucks, or would have paid less for them, had they known about the alleged rigging. Joseph Spak, an RBC Capital Markets analyst, in a research report said "negative publicity" from the lawsuit could drive buyers to trucks from Ford or even Fiat Chrysler's Ram.