Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1979 Chevrolet Nova Custom V8, Automatic on 2040-cars

Year:1979 Mileage:130699 Color: Brown /
 Red
Location:

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V8
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1979
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Nova
Trim: CUSTOM
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: AUTOMATIC
Mileage: 130,699
Exterior Color: Brown
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Red
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1979 CHEVY NOVA CUSTOM, 350 V8, WITH 350 TURBO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.


CAR RUNS GREAT AND LOOKS GREAT.  VERY MINIMAL RUST.  SMALL AREA IN FRONT OF PASSENGER REAR WHEEL WELL, AND SMALL AREA IN PASSENGER WHEEL LIP. DASH PAD IS CRACKED AS ALL 34 YEAR OLD CARS HAVE.

UNDERCARRIAGE IS SOLID WITH MINIMAL RUST.  FLOOR PANS HAVE MINOR RUST AND ARE VERY SOLID.

POWER STEERING, POWER DISK BRAKES, TILT WHEEL(TILT IS A LITTLE LOOSE BUT DOES NOT AFFECT DRIVEABILITY.)

THIS IS AN A/C CAR AND I HAVE ALL ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MINUS THE CONDENSER.

INTERIOR IS ORIGINAL, RED AND BLACK.  SEATS ARE NEAR PERFECT CONDITION, NO TEARS OF ANY KIND.

EVERYTHING WORKS ON THE NOVA, IT IS A GREAT CAR AND GETS ALOT OF ATTENTION.

CRAGAR RIMS PAINTED BLACK. GOOD RUBBER.

AUTOMATIC WITH CENTER CONSOLE.  AFTERMARKET AM/FM CD RADIO, I DIDN'T INSTALL IT(WAS THERE WHEN I BOUGHT CAR).

NOVA HAS TRUE DUAL EXHAUST WITH HEADERS AND FLOWMASTER MUFFLERS(SOUNDS AWESOME AND RUNS GREAT.)

I HAVE MIXED EMOTIONS ABOUT SELLING THIS NOVA, IT IS A GREAT CAR AND FUN TO DRIVE, BUT I HAVE TOO MANY CARS AND THIS IS THE FIRST TO GO.


Auto Services in North Carolina

Wheelings Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 3649 Wilkesboro Blvd, Hudson
Phone: (828) 758-1612

Wasp Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 4906 Meadow Dr, Durham
Phone: (919) 929-2886

Viewmont Auto Sales 2 Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1729 N Center St, Catawba
Phone: (828) 322-3843

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 68 Asheland Ave, Fletcher
Phone: (828) 225-6088

Thomas Auto World ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4645 S Main St, Hope-Mills
Phone: (910) 425-3662

The Speed Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment
Address: 2116 A Veasley St, Oak-Ridge
Phone: (336) 324-1519

Auto blog

Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment

Fri, Jun 17 2016

Fifty years after Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon drove the Ford GT40 to victory at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Ford is poised for a historic return to the Circuit de la Sarthe. The new Ford GT took the top two qualifying positions in the LMGTE Pro class, and four of the top five. Ferrari's 488 filled in the rest of the spots in the top seven, the first two from AF Corse. In other words, we're primed for a reboot of the classic Ford-Ferrari feud at this year's race. Or not, as the ACO, which organizes the 24 Hours of Le Mans, announced sweeping pre-race Balance of Performance (BOP) adjustments this morning that make this year's GT class anybody's race. In LMP1, last year's overall winner Porsche locked up the top two spots with the 919 Hybrid and will lead the entire field at race start. Toyota's two-car factory effort followed with qualifying times 1.004 and 2.170 seconds behind the pole lap. Audi rounds out the manufacturer-backed LMP1 class in fifth and sixth. Full qualifying results can be found here. The storyline for the GT cars is perfect - some say too perfect. Ford's class-leading times came after BOP adjustment to the Corvette Racing C7.R before qualifying. BOP is intended to level the playing field in the class by adjusting power, ballast, and fuel capacity. (Check out this explainer video for more, or even just if you love French accents.) But the process is riddled with unknowns and ripe for accusations of sandbagging. That is, if the Ford cars were intentionally slow in practice they could hope for BOP adjustment to improve their race chances. On the Corvette side, last year's GTE Pro winner went from the top of the field to the bottom, barely improving from practice to qualifying. If you think Le Mans is as rigged at the NBA Playoffs, well, it's not that simple. Because if Ford and Ferrari held back until qualifying - the eighth-place Porsche 911 RSR is three-and-a-half seconds off the class pole time - it was a pretty dumb strategy. This morning, the ACO tried to put things back in order by limiting the boost in the Ford GT's twin-turbo V6 and adding 11 pounds of ballast. Ferrari was also given extra weight but allowed more fuel capacity. The Corvette and Aston Martin teams were both given breaks on their air restrictors, which will allow their engines to make more power. Both Ford and Porsche also received extra fuel capacity.

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?

Fri, Jul 21 2017

General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.