Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 Chevrolet Nova Custom Hatchback 2-door 6.7l on 2040-cars

US $15,000.00
Year:1974 Mileage:5000 Color: Brown with Burnt Orange Stripes /
 Brown with Burnt Orange
Location:

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Hatchback
Engine:5.7L 5737CC 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1974
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Nova
Trim: Custom Hatchback 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: U/K
Options: Custom RFID Alarm
Mileage: 5,000
Power Options: Power Locks
Sub Model: Custom SS
Exterior Color: Brown with Burnt Orange Stripes
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Brown with Burnt Orange
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Beautiful 1974 Chevy Nova Custom SS! Recently rebuilt 406 SBC motor and aftermarket 5 speed tranny. It has BRAND NEW Cragar Eliminator wheels! I have been the proud owner for over 2 years. I have added a custom RFID alarm system and power door locks. The only real flaws in the vehicle are: interior does not have a headliner or seat belts to go with it, the fuel gauge does not work correctly, there is small rust spots on the rear fender flare and it needs headlight bezels. Also, the Nova does not come with the 22" in a few of the above pictures. I have switched them to the Cragar Eliminators. 
The body itself is in GREAT condition. The Nova has been in storage for about a year. It runs and starts great and is a real head turner! I just don't drive it anymore because i have it as a show car but i don't have time for that scene anymore, and I hate to see it sit in storage when it deserves so much more. 
If anyone would like additional pictures, please let me know! 
Thank you for your interest! 

Auto Services in Missouri

Weber Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Storage
Address: 5822 McPherson Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 725-9498

Shuler`s Service Station ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 3026 W Chestnut Expy, Turners
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Schaefer Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 16109 Manchester Rd, Crescent
Phone: (855) 795-5455

OK Tire Store ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: Dugginsville
Phone: (417) 967-3694

Mr. Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Transmission Parts
Address: 302 Business Loop 70 W, Wooldridge
Phone: (573) 441-2358

M & L Auto Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 315 E Broadway St, Fair-Play
Phone: (417) 326-8777

Auto blog

GM warning 800,000 owners that their cars may need oil changes more frequently than they say

Fri, 05 Apr 2013

The days of changing your engine oil every 3,000 miles are long gone thanks to most cars having automatic oil monitoring systems, but about 800,000 General Motors vehicles apparently have incorrect monitoring software that is leading to premature engine component wear. According to Autoweek, certain 2010-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain models equipped with 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines could be going too long in between oil changes resulting in a higher-than-normal number of warranty claims for the engine's balance chain. The balance chain links the balance shaft to the crankshaft, and a worn one can produce higher noise levels.
As a fix, GM dealers will be reprogramming the software for the monitors in an effort to reduce the interval between oil changes, which varies based on driving habits and conditions. Through February 2015, the software update will be done at no cost to vehicle owners, but since this is not a recall, after that point, it will be up to the discretion of dealers as to whether or not they will charge for the service. What isn't immediately clear is whether GM plans on giving assistance to out-of-warranty customers who are experiencing engine issues from the worn chain.

Top horsepower-per-dollar cars in 2017

Tue, Feb 17 2015

Bang for the buck. That quasi-scientific statistic is bandied about by motor heads everywhere from classrooms to barrooms, though the truth of the matter is that it's exceedingly complex to measure. A fair performance-per-dollar index would include something like cross-referencing MSRP (Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price) with point-to-point times on a track or driving route, which is obviously hard to do comprehensively. But, for the sheer joy of talking about cars and playing with a big spreadsheet, there's always the horsepower-per-dollar index, which is more straightforward, albeit hilariously flawed. There are vagaries even with this simple formula, of course: MSRP for vehicles can change at a moment's notice, to say nothing of the bottom-line shifting that happens with local deals or showroom negotiation. For this list we're running with the straight MSRP wherever possible, and as recently reported as we can get it. All the vehicles on this list are 2017 models, and all trims are reported where the lowest price and differing power levels intersect. Some choices were made for personal preference and some for sanity, avoiding things like all 48 trim levels of the Ford Transit, all with the same horsepower). If this list were a simple top ten, or even a top fifty, you'd be bored to tears with all the red, white and blue that is represented. Following perfectly with conventional wisdom, American cars really do lead the world where hp/$ is concerned. So, for the sake of variety (and the sheer joy of seeing a minivan 'win' one round of this thing) I've sorted out some top five and bottom five lists for broad power categories. Let's dive in. Less Than 100 Horsepower Okay, okay, this is hardly a category we'll grant you. But we've often tried to click off all the sub-100-hp cars on sale in the US, and making this list gave us an excuse. It also illustrates that none of these smallish vehicles bring cheap horsepower to the table - for that you'll need a motorcycle. The segment-leading Chevy Spark (above) asks just over $139 for each hp, and that Smart Fortwo Electric Drive has hp on sale for about the same price as its very distant family cousin, the Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG (insert your favorite Smart joke here... we know you want to).

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.