Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1967 Chevy Nova 2 Door Coupe on 2040-cars

Year:1967 Mileage:0
Location:

Middle River, Maryland, United States

Middle River, Maryland, United States
Engine:350 CU. IN.
VIN: 115377W117798 Year: 1967
Model: Nova
Make: Chevrolet
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Very Good Condition Some Minor Flaws"

                          1967 Chevrolet Nova Chevy II 2-door Coupe. This vehicle is in good shape. Vehicle has been garage kept. This car was built as a 60's style street and strip. The engine is a 350 CID with steel crank, 4-bolt main caps, late powder metal con rods W/ARP rod bolts, Keith Black flat top pistons W/CA gapless rings, 10.4 to 1 compression, Comp cam, extreme energy 288 HYD roller cam W/1.6 ratio rockers, Chevrolet Bowtie cylinder heads W/porting, Bowtie VIctor Jr. intake, AED Eliminator carb, Accell electronic dist W/Crane HI-6 ignition, Hooker fender well headers 1 3/4" W/3" exhaust system. Lakewood blow proof bellhousing W/SFI flywheel & street/strip clutch, Borg Warner Iron case Super T 10 transmission with 2.64 1st gear built by Liberty Gears in Michigan. Rear axle is a 12 bolt Chevy narrowed approximately 2.5 inches W/Ford-type press on axle bearings and Moser axles (no C-clips), has a spool & 4.56 ratio ring & pinion. Fuel tank is a new reproduction model W/custom drop sump. Engine is tight and has a fresh set of valve springs. Interior is black vinyl. Has an 8 point NHRA legal roll bar and 5-point harnesses. Has a new clutch disc, pressure plate & throw out bearing. Front brakes are factory manual disc brakes. The front and rear suspensions were redone approximately 6000 miles ago. Engine has approximately 6000 miles as well. This car is not a daily driver, but is great for weekend car shows, cruises, and the drag strip. New set of Mickey Thompson ET street tires and custom car cover.

Auto Services in Maryland

Tyre`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 1955 Greenspring Dr, Hunt-Valley
Phone: (410) 252-8001

Sterling Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 21563 Cascades Pkwy, Gaithersburg
Phone: (703) 450-5895

R & A Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 6136 Reisterstown RD, Govans
Phone: (410) 318-8399

Potomac Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 14550 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Bryans-Road
Phone: (703) 490-6227

Meineke Car Care Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1233 Liberty Rd-Rt 26, Marriottsville
Phone: (410) 970-6788

John`s Rv & Trailer Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service, Trailers-Repair & Service
Address: 257 N Main St, Freeland
Phone: (717) 428-0328

Auto blog

Nissan recalls 3.5 million vehicles over airbag sensor

Sat, Apr 30 2016

Nissan is recalling 3.53 million vehicles globally – 3.2 million in the United States – because the front passenger airbag may or may not deploy properly in the event of a crash. In affected vehicles, the occupant sensing system may not properly register a person sitting in the passenger seat. Passenger-side airbags in roughly 622,000 Nissan Sentra models built between 2013 and 2016 may deploy in crashes when they shouldn't, such as when a child is in the seat. 2016-2017 Nissan Maxima, 2013-2016 Nissan Altima, NV200, and LEAF, 2013-2017 Nissan Pathfinder, 2014-2016 Nissan NV200 Taxi, Infiniti QX60 and Q50, 2014-2017 Nissan Rogue, 2015-2016 Nissan Murano, Chevrolet City Express and 2013 Infiniti JX35 vehicles suffer from the opposite problem. In those models, the airbag may not deploy when it is supposed to. Nissan is aware of at least three crashes where airbags in one of the above models did not function properly, resulting in "moderate injuries." There have already been four recalls since 2013 for similar issues in Nissan vehicles. If you own one of these cars, expect a letter from Nissan in short order (or from GM if you own a Chevy City Express). Related Video: RECALL Subject : Passenger Air Bag may not Deploy due to OCS Error , 1 INVESTIGATION(S) Report Receipt Date: APR 26, 2016 NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V244000 Component(s): AIR BAGS Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc. SUMMARY: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Nissan Maxima, 2013-2016 Nissan Altima, NV200, LEAF and Sentra, 2013-2017 Nissan Pathfinder, 2014-2016 Nissan NV200 Taxi, Infiniti QX60 and Q50, 2014-2017 Nissan Rogue, 2015-2016 Nissan Murano, Chevrolet City Express and 2013 Infiniti JX35 vehicles. In these vehicles, the front seat passenger Occupant Classification System (OCS) may incorrectly classify an adult passenger as a child or classify the seat as empty despite it being occupied. As a result, the passenger frontal air bag may be turned off and not deploy in the event of a crash. CONSEQUENCE: If the passenger frontal air bag does not deploy as intended in the event of a crash, the passenger is at an increased risk of injury. REMEDY: Nissan will notify their owners. Chevrolet City Express owners will be notified by General Motors.

Nissan Frontier and a mid-engine Mustang | Autoblog Podcast #622

Fri, Apr 10 2020

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by News Editor Joel Stocksdale and Associate Editor Byron Hurd. They discuss news about the 2020 and 2021 Nissan Frontier, as well as a mystery Mustang and classic luxury coupes. After that, they talk about cars from the fleet including Chevy Silverados and the long-term Volvo S60 T8. Autoblog Podcast #622 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown 2020 and 2021 Nissan Frontier updates 1966 mid-engine Mustang prototype Personal luxury coupes Cars we're driving 2020 Chevy Silverado 1500 Trail Boss 2020 Chevy Silverado 2500 HD 2020 Volvo S60 T8 plug-in hybrid Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.