Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1963 Nova Convertible on 2040-cars

Year:1963 Mileage:46950 Color: /transmission/top
Location:

Houston, Texas, United States

Houston, Texas, United States

 

You are looking at a rare piece of history here!  As most of you know, the only years of convertible Nova’s/Chevy II were 1962 & 1963.  I addition, a V-8 was not offered until 1964.  There were however some that were “dealer conversions”

Excerpt from Wikipedia:

Available engines for the Chevy II in 1962 and 1963 included a Chevrolet 153 4-cylinder engine (153 cu in (2.5 l)) and a new third generation 194 cu in (3.2 l) Chevrolet straight-6 engine . All Chevy II engines featured Overhead valves. Although the Nova was not originally available with a V8 option, it wouldn't be long before Chevrolet V8s were offered as dealer-installed options (between 1962 and 1963), up to and including the fuel-injected version available in the Corvette. The combination of readily available V8 power and light weight made the Nova a popular choice of drag racers.

This car, from what my brother and I have discerned so far is a dealer conversion.  There are many reasons we think it is.  The inner wells under the hood in the engine bay are not cut and the install looks professional like a dealer converted it back in the day for a customer who wanted a V-8.  We believe the motor is a 1965 283 V-8 and the transmission is a 1965 M21 Muncie 4 speed.  Headers and good condition dual exhaust with chrome tips. Even the shifter itself is of an older variety that my brother (he is a total gear head and used to work in a pit crew) says is from way back because the top handle of the shifter is welded to the shifting rod, and it has a line lock on it (not connected) which is also from way back.  The motor has power pack heads on it, and the old clip on retainers for the Chevrolet valve covers.  I have heard there is a database somewhere of dealer converted VINS, but have yet to dig into it.  I cannot guarantee it is a dealer converted car, but there are a lot of signs that it is.  If whoever gets this car does the digging, they may end up with something far more valuable than I am selling it for. Mileage on the odometer shows 46950.  I could not tell you whether it has flipped or not because the condition is so good.  To be on the safe side though, considering it is 51 years old, it may very well have.

The car is in incredible condition for a unrestored 1963, and turns heads every where it goes because it’s not that common.  That is why I bought it and because it’s a convertible.  As you can see from the pictures the paint looks great and the chrome even better.  The paint does have some blemishes and dings/chips here and there, but overall still looks great and has a nice shine.  The front bumper is a rare optioned bumper as well with the middle safety bar (I think it looks better than without).  It has all the appropriate SS badging, but the VIN plate is not SS coded (again leads me to believe it was a dealer conversion).  It also has the spinner capped SS hubcaps which are in great shape.  The undercarriage is in great shape with virtually no rust.  The trunk and all pans are also in great shape. The convertible top has one small spot where there was a small tear, but it was patched and is hardly noticeable.  Otherwise it is in great shape.  The rear zip out plastic window does have some clouding and could be replaced, but I bought the car to drive topless, so it has never been an issue.  The drivers seat is covered with a matching leather piece on the lower portion, but the original cover is below it.  Just replaced all the bushings on the front end, and the car drives tight and straight hands free. 

A non-refundable $500 deposit will be required at the end of the auction. The remainder will be due in cash or certified check/personal check. I am listing the car locally as well; as such the auction may end early. The vehicle is being sold as-is where-is with no warranty implied.  Vehicle will be released once all funds are secured. I will work with your shipper but you will need to set it up.  All inspections of the car are welcome, and must be done prior to the end of the auction.


On May-09-14 at 06:02:39 PDT, seller added the following information:

 http://s1174.photobucket.com/user/cmotion/slideshow/

Just wanted to provide the address to more pictures I loaded in photobucket ....if there is a problem connecting to this link, email/message me and I will respond with another link or pictures.  Includes: All lower  panels/rockers/chrome/floor pans/engine bay/interior/exterior/transmission/top...etc

You are looking at a rare piece of history here!  As most of you know, the only years of convertible Nova’s/Chevy II were 1962 & 1963.  I addition, a V-8 was not offered until 1964.  There were however some that were “dealer conversions”

Excerpt from Wikipedia:

Available engines for the Chevy II in 1962 and 1963 included a Chevrolet 153 4-cylinder engine (153 cu in (2.5 l)) and a new third generation 194 cu in (3.2 l) Chevrolet straight-6 engine . All Chevy II engines featured Overhead valves. Although the Nova was not originally available with a V8 option, it wouldn't be long before Chevrolet V8s were offered as dealer-installed options (between 1962 and 1963), up to and including the fuel-injected version available in the Corvette. The combination of readily available V8 power and light weight made the Nova a popular choice of drag racers.

This car, from what my brother and I have discerned so far is a dealer conversion.  There are many reasons we think it is.  The inner wells under the hood in the engine bay are not cut and the install looks professional like a dealer converted it back in the day for a customer who wanted a V-8.  We believe the motor is a 1965 283 V-8 and the transmission is a 1965 M21 Muncie 4 speed.  Headers and good condition dual exhaust with chrome tips. Even the shifter itself is of an older variety that my brother (he is a total gear head and used to work in a pit crew) says is from way back because the top handle of the shifter is welded to the shifting rod, and it has a line lock on it (not connected) which is also from way back.  The motor has power pack heads on it, and the old clip on retainers for the Chevrolet valve covers.  I have heard there is a database somewhere of dealer converted VINS, but have yet to dig into it.  I cannot guarantee it is a dealer converted car, but there are a lot of signs that it is.  If whoever gets this car does the digging, they may end up with something far more valuable than I am selling it for. Mileage on the odometer shows 46950.  I could not tell you whether it has flipped or not because the condition is so good.  To be on the safe side though, considering it is 51 years old, it may very well have.

The car is in incredible condition for a unrestored 1963, and turns heads every where it goes because it’s not that common.  That is why I bought it and because it’s a convertible.  As you can see from the pictures the paint looks great and the chrome even better.  The paint does have some blemishes and dings/chips here and there, but overall still looks great and has a nice shine.  The front bumper is a rare optioned bumper as well with the middle safety bar (I think it looks better than without).  It has all the appropriate SS badging, but the VIN plate is not SS coded (again leads me to believe it was a dealer conversion).  It also has the spinner capped SS hubcaps which are in great shape.  The undercarriage is in great shape with virtually no rust.  The trunk and all pans are also in great shape. The convertible top has one small spot where there was a small tear, but it was patched and is hardly noticeable.  Otherwise it is in great shape.  The rear zip out plastic window does have some clouding and could be replaced, but I bought the car to drive topless, so it has never been an issue.  The drivers seat is covered with a matching leather piece on the lower portion, but the original cover is below it.  Just replaced all the bushings on the front end, and the car drives tight and straight hands free. 

A non-refundable $500 deposit will be required at the end of the auction. The remainder will be due in cash or certified check/personal check. I am listing the car locally as well; as such the auction may end early. The vehicle is being sold as-is where-is with no warranty implied.  Vehicle will be released once all funds are secured. I will work with your shipper but you will need to set it up.  All inspections of the car are welcome, and must be done prior to the end of the auction.


Auto Services in Texas

Yos Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 3601 W Parmer Ln, Cedar-Park
Phone: (512) 873-9354

Yarubb Enterprise ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 2640 Northaven Rd, Richardson
Phone: (972) 243-3100

WEW Auto Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 13807 Candleshade Ln, Pearland
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Welsh Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4201 Center St, Deer-Park
Phone: (281) 479-3030

Ward`s Mobile Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Liverpool
Phone: (832) 738-3228

Walnut Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Brake Repair
Address: 4401 W Walnut St, Murphy
Phone: (972) 272-5522

Auto blog

Some 2012-13 Chevy Volts may not have enough battery coolant

Mon, Jun 23 2014

The 2012 and 2013 model year Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in vehicle may have a battery glitch caused by low coolant levels. No recall has been issued and General Motors is taking care of the issue at no cost to drivers. Some of the affected Volts may have lower-than-advisable coolant levels because of some pesky air pockets in the car's cooling circuit. When the coolant levels get too low, the charging system for the battery powering the car's onboard generator (i.e. the Rechargeable Energy Storage System, or the RESS) may be shut down, turning one's Volt into a run-of-the-mill gas-powered car, and a pricey one at that. The Car Connection says GM is advising owners of the '12 and '13 Volts to contact their local Chevy dealer for a free fix. GM representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from AutoblogGreen for more details. We believe this is a separate issue than the one that brought 8,000 Volts back to the dealers for a battery coolant fix, what GM called a "voluntary customer satisfaction effort," a few years ago. General Motors sold 23,094 Chevy Volts last year after selling 23,461 Volts in 2012, so that fix-it list may get fairly lengthy. Check out a GM-Volt.com user thread related to this issue here. *UPDATE: Chevrolet spokesman Randy Fox confirmed in an e-mail to AutoblogGreen that the company issued a service bulletin to dealers that they may need to top off coolant levels on certain Volts because of the issue, and that the vehicle will "return to normal charging operation" once that's done.

First privately owned Corvette Stingray blitzes 1/4 mile in 12.23 at 114.88 mph

Tue, 01 Oct 2013

Chevrolet's latest road rocket, the Corvette Stingray, is a very quick car. If one needs further proof of that, we recommend they take a look at this video from Hennessey of what is claimed to be the first privately owned C7 Corvette to make a pass down the quarter mile. Not just any quarter mile, mind, this black C7 blitzed its way down the tuner's primary testing dragstrip. The Chevrolet ran the quarter in just 12.23 seconds at 114.88 miles per hour. That is a very quick time for a stock car.
Equipped with the Z51 package and a six-speed automatic transmission, not only does the C7 run a solid time, but it does so with little to no drama. That won't last though, as Hennessey will likely return it to its owner with far more power - we just hope they show a drag run of the completed product. Take a look below to watch the C7's 12.23-second run on video.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.