Chevrolet Malibu Lt New 4 Dr Sedan Automatic Gasoline 2.5l L4 Dir Dohc 16v Silv on 2040-cars
Duluth, Georgia, United States
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:2.5L 2457CC 153Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
New
Year: 2014
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Make: Chevrolet
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Model: Malibu
Mileage: 0
Sub Model: LT
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: SILV ICE MET
Engine Description: 2.5L L4 DIR DOHC 16V
Interior Color: JET BLK PREM CLTH/LTH
Trim: LT Sedan 4-Door
Number of Cylinders: 4
Drive Type: FWD
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Options: Compact Disc
Chevrolet Malibu for Sale
- Chevrolet malibu 4dr sedan lt w/1lt new automatic gasoline 2.5l 4 cyl iridescent(US $28,605.00)
- *brand new* 2015 chevy malibu *lt* edition(US $16,500.00)
- Chevrolet malibu ls new 4 dr sedan automatic gasoline 2.5l l4 dir dohc 16v ashen(US $24,735.00)
- 1966 chevrolet chevelle resto mod ~ ls7 powered chevelle ~ the ultimate sleeper!(US $75,000.00)
- 2010 chevy malibu lt w/2lt automatic/paddle shift carfax cert 1 owner xtra nice!(US $13,990.00)
- Chevrolet malibu 4dr sedan ls w/1ls low miles automatic gasoline 2.5l 4 cyl silv(US $17,888.00)
Auto Services in Georgia
ZBest Cars ★★★★★
Woods Automotive ★★★★★
Wellington Auto Sales ★★★★★
Volvotista ★★★★★
US Auto Sales - Covington ★★★★★
US Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalling nearly 4,000 vehicles over airbag concerns
Thu, 31 Jan 2013Four different General Motors vehicles from the 2012 model year are being recalled over a potential airbag issue. The driver's side airbag shorting bar in the 2012 Buick Verano and 2012 Chevrolet Camaro, Cruze and Sonic might make contact with the airbag terminals, even during a crash. If so, the airbag won't deploy when it should, possibly increasing injury to the driver.
The recall is expected to begin on February 13 for the 3,896 units that might be affected. GM will notify owners who can then take their vehicles to dealers to have the airbag coil replaced. A bulletin from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration below has more info.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia
Fri, Jan 16 2015These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.052 s, 7808 u