2007 Chevrolet Express 3500 Base Standard Cargo Van 3-door 6.0l on 2040-cars
Houston, Texas, United States
|
2007 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO G3500/6.0L V8 MPI 196K MILES VIN# 1GCHG39U071238196
GASOLINE 3DR RWD $7500 BREND: CHEVY YEAR: 2007 MODEL: EXPRESS G3500 ENGINE: 6.0 LITERS 8 CYLINDERS VIN# 1GCHG39U071238196 MODIFICATION: 3 DOOR FULL SIZE REAR WHEEL DRIVE A4 MILES: 196 000 TIRES BRAND NEW! GREAT PRICE. GREAT PRODUCT. GREATER VALUE. VAN IS IN GREAT SHAPE! DO NOT MISS OUT ON GREAT DEAL! NO LONGER NEEDED DUE TO AN UPGRADE! HAS TO GO ASAP! FREIGHT QUOTE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST ---Shipping costs will vary depending on location. --- If you have any questions please call 713-644-4011. ***Everything is sold as-is, where-is, without warranties, unless expressed in writing.*** Industrial Surplus Inc. is a surplus warehouse in Houston, Texas with several lay-down yards throughout the United States. We buy and sell ALL types of surplus equipment, machinery and material nationwide. We make every effort to provide honest and full disclosure regarding the condition of our inventory and include photos, however the following should be considered prior to purchase. All items are sold as-is, with no warranty or guaranty expressed or implied. Though some items may be in the original manufacturers packaging, ALL are sold as Used Surplus. As with all "used" items, there may be signs of use and wear, e.g. minor scratches, scuffs, or blemishes. Test results and maintenance records will also vary per item. Please feel free to contact one of our representatives at (713) 644-4011 with ANY questions regarding product condition or shipping options prior to purchasing, bidding or submitting a best offer on eBay. We will be very happy to address any and all questions or concerns.
|
Chevrolet Express for Sale
2012 chrvrolet express 2500 cargo van for sale~135"~bins & racks~ready to work
2008 chevrolet express 2500 base standard cargo van 4-door 6.0l(US $14,500.00)
2014 van used- 6.0l v8, automatic 6-speed, rwd, white
2002 chevrolet express van explorer conversion, 1-owner, only 79k mi, dvd,(US $13,988.00)
Florida gorgeous luxury hi top conversion van leather seating television seats 7(US $14,989.00)
2008 chevy explorer limited se hi-top conversion van loaded with options nice!!!(US $19,800.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Z Rated Automotive Sales & Service ★★★★★
Xtreme Tinting & Alarms ★★★★★
Wayne`s World of Cars ★★★★★
Vaughan`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Vandergriff Honda ★★★★★
Trade Lane Motors ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment
Fri, Jun 17 2016Fifty years after Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon drove the Ford GT40 to victory at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Ford is poised for a historic return to the Circuit de la Sarthe. The new Ford GT took the top two qualifying positions in the LMGTE Pro class, and four of the top five. Ferrari's 488 filled in the rest of the spots in the top seven, the first two from AF Corse. In other words, we're primed for a reboot of the classic Ford-Ferrari feud at this year's race. Or not, as the ACO, which organizes the 24 Hours of Le Mans, announced sweeping pre-race Balance of Performance (BOP) adjustments this morning that make this year's GT class anybody's race. In LMP1, last year's overall winner Porsche locked up the top two spots with the 919 Hybrid and will lead the entire field at race start. Toyota's two-car factory effort followed with qualifying times 1.004 and 2.170 seconds behind the pole lap. Audi rounds out the manufacturer-backed LMP1 class in fifth and sixth. Full qualifying results can be found here. The storyline for the GT cars is perfect - some say too perfect. Ford's class-leading times came after BOP adjustment to the Corvette Racing C7.R before qualifying. BOP is intended to level the playing field in the class by adjusting power, ballast, and fuel capacity. (Check out this explainer video for more, or even just if you love French accents.) But the process is riddled with unknowns and ripe for accusations of sandbagging. That is, if the Ford cars were intentionally slow in practice they could hope for BOP adjustment to improve their race chances. On the Corvette side, last year's GTE Pro winner went from the top of the field to the bottom, barely improving from practice to qualifying. If you think Le Mans is as rigged at the NBA Playoffs, well, it's not that simple. Because if Ford and Ferrari held back until qualifying - the eighth-place Porsche 911 RSR is three-and-a-half seconds off the class pole time - it was a pretty dumb strategy. This morning, the ACO tried to put things back in order by limiting the boost in the Ford GT's twin-turbo V6 and adding 11 pounds of ballast. Ferrari was also given extra weight but allowed more fuel capacity. The Corvette and Aston Martin teams were both given breaks on their air restrictors, which will allow their engines to make more power. Both Ford and Porsche also received extra fuel capacity.
NHTSA investigates 1.7 million GM SUVs for windshield wiper failures
Tue, Nov 6 2018WASHINGTON - The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said on Tuesday it is investigating whether General Motors should recall an additional 1.7 million sport utility vehicles due to an issue with windshield wiper failures. GM in August 2016 recalled 367,800 2013 GMC Terrain and Chevrolet Equinox SUVs in the United States to address the problem. But after receiving 249 complaints about similar problems, the federal agency said it is probing whether the recall should be expanded to include an additional 1.7 million vehicles from the 2010-2016 model years. The automaker said it is cooperating with the NHTSA review. GM said it recalled the 2013 GMC Terrain and Chevrolet Equinox SUVs "because warranty data showed a higher-than-expected failure rate," adding it has continued to monitor field data on other model years of those vehicles. GM noted that no crashes or injuries related to the issue have been reported. The Detroit-based automaker said the recalls were prompted after a GM Canada brand quality manager reported a potential safety issue relating to reports of windshield wiper failures in Canada through GM's "Speak Up For Safety," program in late 2015. The data showed significantly higher field incidents in parts of Canada, which prompted a June 2016 recall there. Over the next two months, a higher number of U.S. reports prompted a U.S. recall, the company added. In the 2016 recall, GM said the front-wiper module would be replaced with a module that has a water deflector and, if needed, dealers would fill the water management hole and drill a new small hole in a different location.(Reporting by David Shepardson, editing by G Crosse)Related Video: Government/Legal Recalls Chevrolet GM GMC SUV












