2001 Chevrolet Express 1500 Ls Standard Passenger Van 3-door 5.7l on 2040-cars
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Body Type:Standard Passenger Van
Engine:5.7 L
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Express
Options: Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Trim: Exlporer Conversion
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 71,500
Sub Model: Express Limited Conversion
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Exterior Color: Beige
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Vehicle was purchased (2nd owner) in 2007 with 24,000 miles. Transmission, brakes, engine all in great shape. Tires have about 40k miles of life left in them. Conversion features include:
- front heated seats
- dual captains chairs
- electric sofa bed in rear
- window blinds
- 13" tv with vcr and dvd player
- vaccuum
- numerous electrical outlets
- limousine lighting
- raised roof with multiple storage compartments
- nintendo gaming hookup
- center console with cooler and heated cup holders
- traction control
- dual stereo controls
Chevrolet Express for Sale
- 1999 chevrolet express 1500 ls standard passenger van 3-door 5.7l
- 2004 chevrolet express cargo van ready for service from sunny arizona 46 k miles(US $11,777.00)
- 1999 chevrolet express 1500 ls conversion passenger van 3-door 5.7l
- 2008 chevy express 3500 extended 6.0l v8 15-pass 72k mi texas direct auto(US $14,480.00)
- 2000 chevrolet express conversion van 102 k miles 7 passenger fl(US $6,300.00)
- 07 chev 8 passenger van, duo therm a/c and genorator, all service records(US $14,295.00)
Auto Services in Connecticut
Yankee Discount Muffler ★★★★★
Towne Body Shop Inc ★★★★★
Superior Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Speed Sport Tuning ★★★★★
Ron Johns Pit Stop ★★★★★
Middlesex Auto Center, Inc. ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #316 LIVE!
Mon, 14 Jan 2013We record Autoblog Podcast #316 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #316
2013 Detroit Auto Show
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.