Excellent 1964 Chevy Chevelle on 2040-cars
MAMMOTH SPRING, Arkansas, United States
This car is excellent. It is a California
Black Plate car. I have the original 1963
plates that came with the car. American
Muscle Car show at Gateway Raceway (750 cars)
and won two 1st places and one 2nd. While at
the KSHE Car show put it on a chassis dyno
and it made 712 RHP (883hp flywheel) and was
8% lean. No rust, being originally from
California. The paint is a dark blue with a
slight purple hue added to the clear coat.
R&R Chassis of Arnold, MO has installed an
8pt moly cage and is now certified to 8.50 as
of April '06 to keep it legal under 9.90. The
engine is a 4 bolt 406 cu in with AFR 220
heads match ported to the Weiand blower
intake. Comp cams custom grind cam and
springs setup just for this car (weight,
tranny, rear, etc). Comp cams gear drive.
Crower stainless rockers, Comp cams stud
girdle. Aluminum Fab valve covers. Eagle 4340
Pro crank and 4340 H Beam rods under J&E
dished blower pistons Milodon pan. Headers
are Hooker Super Comps that have been Cerma-
coated by JCM Machine in House Springs, MO.
Mufflers are Flow Masters with 3" tubes. The
blower is an 8-71 Weiand unit running at 3%
under for 12 lbs of boost topped with two 750
cfm Demon race carbs that are boost
referenced to the blower and bench flowed.
The intake scoop is custom made from
scratch with three gauges in the rear showing
boost, oil pressure, and vacuum. Moroso 3
vane vacuum pump. A Griffin 2 pass (same as 4
core)aluminum radiator and 17" electric fan.
A CSR electric billet water pump has a custom
made billet manifold with #12 braided line
relocated to the right front radiator support
to keep the front of the motor clean and
uncluttered. Custom aluminum polished
overflow cans for the radiator and vacuum
system are fed by braided stainless
lines...as are every other line on the
engine. The tranny is a Wise 1.76 Pro Glide
with transbrake behind a 3500 stall coan
Blower converter. 1350 yokes at both ends of
a custom driveshaft came from Transmissions
To Go in Arnold, MO. Miller's Rear Gears in
Valley Park, MO narrowed the 9" Ford 3 inches
and stiffened it with a full length rear
brace, a Strange center section with a light
weight spool and 35 spline axles and added
disk brakes. The adjustable brackets for the
custom made upper and lower control arms to
keep the car in a stock suspension class A
custom anti-roll bar. The fuel tank is an 18
gallon aluminum unit. Barry Grant fuel pump
and 4 port pressure regulator. The car is
street legal and currently has plates on it.
The tires are new and are 10.5 inch MT Drag
Radials on the rear and MT Sportsmans on the
front with Weld Draglite XPs all around.
Kirkey Aluminum Race seats with black
upholstery. MSD 7 Digital programmable
ignition with 45 psi MAP sensor and fiber
optic signal pickup. All new original
equipment wiring in car with all electric
race accessories on its own circuit all
separate from original equipment wiring.
This car is street legal. I have original
hood, seats and gas tank. I have extra tires
and wheels and a spare blower drive belt &
pulley. Other misc. parts $38,000 OBO 870-625-0026
Chevrolet Chevelle for Sale
1969 chevrolet chevelle(US $12,805.00)
1965 chevrolet chevelle(US $15,600.00)
1968 chevrolet chevelle ss(US $18,850.00)
1970 chevrolet chevelle malibu convertible $40,000 (US $40,000.00)
1967 chevrolet chevelle ss big block/500hp(US $15,000.00)
1970 chevrolet chevelle(US $33,990.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Warren Service & Repair ★★★★★
Tim Parker Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★
S & P Motors ★★★★★
Premier Collision ★★★★★
Paragould Autobody ★★★★★
N Motion Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy's low-cost pedestrian avoidance to debut on 2016 Malibu
Tue, Jul 28 2015The mainstreaming of safety technologies that began on luxury vehicles will get a big boost from General Motors later this year. The General says it plans to offer 22 driver assistance systems across its product portfolio of 2016 models, starting with the redesigned Chevrolet Malibu - the one that we know will keep tabs on teenagers for the benefit of parents. Pedestrian avoidance will be another of its available options. Instead of kitting the sedan out with numerous and expensive radar arrays, the GM system uses the camera mounted next to the rearview mirror that is already used for the lane-keeping function. New software lets it detect pedestrians, and when it detects a potential collision with one, it can alert the driver and brake autonomously if the driver doesn't react. Eventually, engineers want to give it the ability to do the same with cyclists. Because it uses existing hardware updated with new code, GM says the application costs "a few hundred dollars." GM demonstrated the Front Pedestrian Braking preventing a crash with a dummy pedestrian at speeds up to 15 miles per hour. Automotive News reports that it will reduce the severity of impact up to 40 miles per hour, but "may not be of much use in collisions at higher speeds." That feature will also join the options list of the Cadillac CT6. The press release below has more on GM's driver tech soon on the way. Related Video: GM Paving Way to Smarter and Safer Driving at All-New Active Safety Test Area 22 crash-avoidance technologies offered on 2016 Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac models MILFORD, Mich. 2015-07-24 – Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac will offer 22 different active safety technologies across their 2016 model year U.S. lineups, ranging from driver alerts to those that automatically intervene and assist the driver in critical situations. Safety engineers will develop and test these and other safety technologies for products around the world at GM's new, 52-acre Active Safety Test Area at its Milford Proving Ground near Detroit. The $14 million facility officially opened Friday. "Our comprehensive safety strategy of helping customers before, during and after a crash continues," said Jeff Boyer, vice president of GM Global Vehicle Safety.
Chevy Volt has worst sales month since August 2011, Nissan Leaf also down
Tue, Feb 3 2015January is traditionally a time when new car shoppers take a break. For the last few years, if we isolate our focus to just the first two major plug-in cars in the US market, we see that the first month of the year was lower – often dramatically lower – than the 11 that followed. So, when you see the Chevy Volt dropped and Nissan Leaf sales figures for January 2015, don't be too surprised. The Volt sold only 542 units last month, that model's lowest since August 2011. That also represents a 41 percent drop from January 2014, and it reinforces the thought that if anyone out there is interested in a new Volt, they're going to be waiting for the new model to drop later this year. While we do expect sales to climb in February and into spring, we won't be surprised if the general Volt trend remains quiet until the second-generation arrives. On the Leaf side of the ledger, January's low sales numbers were still about twice as high as the Volt's – the Leaf sold 1,070 units last month, the lowest since February 2013 – but it did break a streak for the Japanese automaker. Usually, each month represents at least an increase over the same month a year ago, but that wasn't the case this time. In January 2014, Nissan sold 1,252 Leafs. Still, Brendan Jones, Nissan's director of electric vehicle sales and infrastructure, issued an upbeat statement: "We saw a significant increase in demand in December from Nissan Leaf customers looking to take advantage of federal and state incentives at the end of the tax year, which pulled some sales ahead. We're confident that EV sales will continue to rise over time due to increasing emission regulations and other reasons for purchase of EVs such as lower operating costs, reducing dependence on foreign energy sources, environmental concerns and a great driving experience." The numbers will tell us soon enough. News Source: General Motors, Nissan Green Chevrolet Nissan Electric Hybrid ev sales brendan jones
This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location
Thu, Apr 28 2016Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.