Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Ford Mustang Base Convertible 2-door 3.8l on 2040-cars

US $4,500.00
Year:2002 Mileage:92900
Location:

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Brooklyn, New York, United States
Advertising:

Selling this 2002 Mustang Convertible for my sister. She was the second owner of this car, purchased a few years ago from her neighbor. It has been well maintained and cared for. Maintenance done regularly and never any expenses spared. Has a little under 93k miles, very reliable with no issues, has power everything and everything works. Any questions please contact her at 646-784-5810. The car is located in Brooklyn NY

Auto Services in New York

Vogel`s Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 100 N Winton Rd, Ontario-Center
Phone: (585) 482-9655

Vinnies Truck & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 451 Windsor Pl, East-Rockaway
Phone: (929) 224-0634

Triangle Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 60 Park Ave, Castleton
Phone: (718) 442-9159

Transmission Giant Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1114 Broadhollow Rd, Glenwood-Landing
Phone: (631) 293-0090

Town Line Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6501 State Route 32, Berne
Phone: (518) 966-8003

Tony`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 503 Brown St, Evans-Mills
Phone: (315) 639-6300

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #316 LIVE!

Mon, 14 Jan 2013

We record Autoblog Podcast #316 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #316
2013 Detroit Auto Show

GM drops diesel engines for 2020 Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain crossovers

Fri, Jul 12 2019

GM is officially discontinuing the diesel engine in the Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain for the 2020 model year. The 1.6-liter turbodiesel was always an oddball of an engine in the compact crossover segment, and now the experiment has come to an end. The Car Connection initially reported the news, and a GMC spokesperson, Stuart Fowle, confirmed it to us this morning.  “A huge majority of our Terrain customers have opted for one of our two gas engines," says Fowle. We canÂ’t say this eventuality comes as a massive surprise, as we saw news from couple of months ago that GM was dropping all-wheel drive from the diesel-powered cars for 2020. Low demand was cited as the reason for that cull, and itÂ’s the same for the little GM crossovers this time around, too. These vehicles were the only ones powered with a diesel engine in their class, but thatÂ’s going to be changing. Just as GM is going away from the diesel, Mazda is finally bringing its diesel to market in the CX-5. YouÂ’ll only be able to get that engine in the most expensive ($42,045) trim level, combined with all-wheel drive, though. The cheapest Equinox diesel starts at a comparably low $30,795. ThatÂ’s a $2,400 upcharge over the base 1.5-liter turbo four-cylinder, and the value is questionable. Mileage is better, but diesel fuel is more expensive. Towing capability didnÂ’t increase over the base engineÂ’s 1,500-pound capacity, but the extra torque around town was nice. As diesels go in the U.S., this one was rather rough and noisy, possibly contributing to some turning their noses up after a test drive. Perhaps another reason for its demise was that the much quicker 2.0-liter turbo Equinox was only $100 more than the diesel. This engine offered significantly better towing at 3,500 pounds, too. You can read all about what we thought of the diesel in our first drive review here, but the 2019 model year is the last one if you had it on your shortlist. This article has been updated to indicate the source.