1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Ss454 on 2040-cars
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
If you have more questions or want more details please email : scarlett.bischof@chewiemail.com .
'71 CHEVELLE SS454 CONVERTIBLE Professional No-expense-spared restoration of this iconic muscle car the '71 Chevelle SS454 Chevrolet "Big-Block" 454cid V8 @ 365HP Optional Overdrive Automatic transmission Original 12-Bolt Heavy Duty rear differential Mirror finish Sunfire Yellow paint with Black SuperSport stripes show waxed & detailed Great looking Tan Bucket seat interior with full factory center console and shifter Full array of gauges including 7K RPM Tach 120mph speedo and Working Clock Black power convertible top with matching boot Period correct color matched steering wheel Custom hide-away AM/FM/CD/USB/AUX Pioneer digital sound system Custom mounted Hi-Fi rear quarter speakers New Carpets Door Panels & Convertible Top Optional factory Air-conditioning A/C Show ready detailed engine compartment Great looking chrome + stainless trim Upgraded Power Disc Brakes Optional fast-ratio power steering New Chrome & Stainless steel trim 17" Cragar 5-spoke Alloys w/ Nitto Radials Great sounding dual exhaust w/ factory tips Professionally reproduced and restored 454cid Big-Block V8 Overdrive Automatic (perfect for highway cruising Sunfire Yellow paint and the top goes down too! Show or simply enjoy going for a drive in this legendary collector quality '71 ChevroletChevelle SS454 Convertible.
Chevrolet Chevelle for Sale
1966 chevrolet chevelle ss 396(US $32,400.00)
1970 chevrolet chevelle super sport(US $26,700.00)
Excellent 1964 chevy chevelle(US $38,000.00)
1969 chevrolet chevelle(US $12,805.00)
1965 chevrolet chevelle(US $15,600.00)
1968 chevrolet chevelle ss(US $18,850.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Westport Auto Inc ★★★★★
Tire World ★★★★★
Powertrain Auto Service ★★★★★
Milex Complete Auto Care ★★★★★
Jiffy Lube ★★★★★
Heritage FIAT Owings Mills ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
A car writer's year in new vehicles [w/video]
Thu, Dec 18 2014Christmas is only a week away. The New Year is just around the corner. As 2014 draws to a close, I'm not the only one taking stock of the year that's we're almost shut of. Depending on who you are or what you do, the end of the year can bring to mind tax bills, school semesters or scheduling dental appointments. For me, for the last eight or nine years, at least a small part of this transitory time is occupied with recalling the cars I've driven over the preceding 12 months. Since I started writing about and reviewing cars in 2006, I've done an uneven job of tracking every vehicle I've been in, each year. Last year I made a resolution to be better about it, and the result is a spreadsheet with model names, dates, notes and some basic facts and figures. Armed with this basic data and a yen for year-end stories, I figured it would be interesting to parse the figures and quantify my year in cars in a way I'd never done before. The results are, well, they're a little bizarre, honestly. And I think they'll affect how I approach this gig in 2015. {C} My tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015 it'll be as high as 73. Let me give you a tiny bit of background about how automotive journalists typically get cars to test. There are basically two pools of vehicles I drive on a regular basis: media fleet vehicles and those available on "first drive" programs. The latter group is pretty self-explanatory. Journalists are gathered in one location (sometimes local, sometimes far-flung) with a new model(s), there's usually a day of driving, then we report back to you with our impressions. Media fleet vehicles are different. These are distributed to publications and individual journalists far and wide, and the test period goes from a few days to a week or more. Whereas first drives almost always result in a piece of review content, fleet loans only sometimes do. Other times they serve to give context about brands, segments, technology and the like, to editors and writers. So, adding up the loans I've had out of the press fleet and things I've driven at events, my tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015, it'll be as high as 73. At one of the buff books like Car and Driver or Motor Trend, reviewers might rotate through five cars a week, or more. I know that number sounds high, but as best I can tell, it's pretty average for the full-time professionals in this business.
Officially Official: Chevrolet replaces Daewoo name in Korea
Thu, 20 Jan 2011
Chevrolet Camaro in Korea - Click above for high-resolution image
There once was a time when Daewoo was one of the biggest companies in South Korea. It was larger than both LG and Samsung, and second only to Hyundai. But these days the name is all but gone.