1991 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Sedan 4-door 5.0l on 2040-cars
Woodbury, New York, United States
ALL ORIGINAL 1991 CAPRICE CLASSIC / LTZ ONLY 2 ADULT OWNERS
UP FOR SALE IS MY DAD'S CHEVY, HIM BEING 75 AND A RETIRED MECHANIC WITH OVER 50 YEARS EXPERIENCE HAS MADE SURE SHE RUNS PERFECT. CAR HAS BEEN PARKED 6 MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS DUE TO THE FACT THAT DAD AND MOM ARE RETIRED AND TRAVEL OVERSEAS 6 MONTHS AT A TIME. THEY DO NOT DO MUCH DRIVING ANY MORE WHEN BACK IN N.Y., THE FALL AND WINTER SEASON. THE CAR IS JUST TAKING UP SPACE IN FRONT OF MY HOME AND SOMEONE COULD REALLY GET SOME GOOD USE OUT OF IT, CAR LOOKS GREAT! EXTERIOR HAS NO ACCIDENT REPAIRS BUT SOME RUST HAS SHOWN UP IN THE LAST YEAR OR SO, ESPECIALLY ON THE DRIVER'S REAR QUARTER WHERE IT IS EXPOSED TO THE STREET WEATHER ELEMENTS. THE REST OF THE CAR LOOKS GOOD FOR A 22 YEAR OLD CLASSIC. PAINT NOT AS SHINY AS IT SHOULD BE BUT AGAIN LOOKS GOOD FOR ITS AGE INTERIOR IS LIKE NEW, NO SIGNS OF ANY TEARS OR ABUSE. POWER WINDOWS AND LOCKS WORK PROPERLY ODOMETER READING ON DASH IS WRONG, ACTUAL MILES ON CAR ARE 110,598. ODOMETER WAS CHANGED BY DAD BACK IN 2007 DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE EVENING ODOMETER CLUSTER LIGHTS DID NOT WORK. HE DECIDED TO CHANGE THE ENTIRE ODOMETER CLUSTER. I TRACKED DOWN THE ACTUAL MILEAGE FROM CARFAX INSPECTION READINGS. AFTER CALCULATING THE OLD AND "NEWER" ODOMETER READING, THERE IS A 65,112 MILE DIFFERENCE. MOST RECENT REPAIRS: NEW BATTERY ABOUT A YEAR AGO, NEW ALTERNATOR AND BELT ABOUT A YEAR AGO, NEW TIRES ABOUT A YEAR AGO, OIL CHANGE LAST WEEK. ENGINE COMPARTMENT UNDER THE HOOD IS LIKE NEW, NO OIL LEAKS AND ALL NICE AND CLEAN AS NEW. THE 305 8 CYLINDER MOTORS ARE KNOWN TO RUN FOREVER, WITH A LITTLE TLC
BID WITH CONFIDENCE !! EITHER CALL ME OR TEXT ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS @ 516-864-3118 ANY REASONABLE OFFERS ARE WELCOMED
|
Chevrolet Caprice for Sale
- 2 owner 91 chevrolet caprice 4d sedan 5.0l 305 v8 automatic video(US $4,999.00)
- 1994 chevrolet caprice classic 4 door blue sedan non smoker(US $4,400.00)
- 1973 chevrolet caprice classic convertible 2-door 5.7l(US $15,500.00)
- 1967 bel air wagon.. tilt steering wheel.. luggage rack.. posi rearend
- 1989 chevrolet caprice classic ls brougham sedan 4-door 5.0l(US $3,000.00)
- 1966 2 door chevy chevrolet caprice 327 c.i. auto nice!(US $12,900.00)
Auto Services in New York
Zoni Customs ★★★★★
Williams Toyota Scion ★★★★★
Watertown Auto Repair Svc ★★★★★
VOS Motorsports ★★★★★
Village Automotive Center ★★★★★
V J`s Car Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM reintroduces Tripower name in the worst way possible
Wed, Aug 1 2018The story of General Motors' use of the Tripower moniker begins way back in 1957, when Semon E. "Bunkie" Knudsen, then General Manager of GM's Pontiac division, directed his engineers to inject more performance into his brand's line of V8-powered automobiles. Fuel injection was an option, but hot rodders flocked instead to Tri-Power (marketed way back when with a hyphen), which grafted a trio of two-barrel Rochester carburetors onto a single intake manifold. A legend was born. And that legend was born of performance. At idle and when full power wasn't required, Pontiac's Tri-Power system used just the middle carburetor, which helped make the setup easier to tune. Depending on the year and model, either a vacuum system or a mechanical linkage opened up the two outer carbs, thereby switching from two barrels to six, and allowing the engine to take in more fuel and air. And it was an easy marketing win – six barrels is better than four barrels, right? Because performance! So, when news filtered in that GM has resurrected the Tripower name, those of us who grew up attending classic car shows and wrenching on old Pontiacs did a double-take. And then we all collectively sighed. Turns out that today's Tripower refers to a trio of fuel-saving measures that include cylinder deactivation, active thermal management, and intake valve lift control, according to Automotive News. And, at least for now, it applies to GM's line of fullsize trucks powered by a 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. We're all for saving fuel whenever possible. And we have zero say in how any automaker chooses to market its products and technologies. But, we'll offer our two cents anyway: Relaunching a storied name from the past is fine. Relaunching a storied name from the past while completely overlooking the reasons the name got famous in the first place is only going to irritate the people who remember the name in the first place. Couldn't they just call this new technology package something else? Related Video: News Source: Automotive NewsImage Credit: Getty Green Marketing/Advertising Chevrolet GM Pontiac Automotive History Truck chevrolet silverado
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.