Rare Aqua Blue Metallic Camaro 2010 on 2040-cars
Kearneysville, West Virginia, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6 Cylinder
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Chevrolet
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Camaro
Options: Sunroof, CD Player
Drive Type: Automatic
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 57,950
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: 2dr Cpe 1LT
Exterior Color: Rare Aqua Blue Metallic with Silver Stripes
Interior Color: Black & Gray
Vehicle Inspection: Inspected (include details in your description)
Number of Cylinders: 6
Number of Doors: 2
Trim: base coupe 2-door
This particular Camaro has the gorgeous and discontinued Aqua Blue Metallic exterior paint with silver stripes, making this a desirable and rare vehicle. The pictures do this car no justice for they were taken at dusk.This Camaro has 57,950 pampered miles and has no engine or suspension modifications. The car is nicely optioned and well maintained and was always garaged. One owner. It was never in an accident or sustained any damage, only being driven in perfect weather. I have all the factory paper work for this vehicle. This vehicle has 19" polish alloy rims with new Pirelli PZero-Nero Tires.
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
- 2ss auto coupe 6.2l, 8k miles! heated leather! sunroof! carfax 1 owner!(US $29,266.00)
- Matching #'s 327 & 4 speed - untouched since 1976 - all original solid survivor
- 2000 camaro ss slp 6-speed ls1 convertible 1 of 13 built
- 1981 chevrolet camaro z-28
- 2012 chevy camaro 2lt v6 rs package metallic imperial blue(US $27,750.00)
- 1986 camero, new paint(US $5,500.00)
Auto Services in West Virginia
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Sun Tech Auto Glass ★★★★★
Mobil 1 Lube Express ★★★★★
Mint Motors Inc ★★★★★
Meineke Car Care Center ★★★★★
Iser`s 24 Hour Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM to trim Russian output, raise prices amid currency woes
Thu, Feb 5 2015General Motors is shutting down its factory in Russia's second largest city, St. Petersburg, from the middle of March until the middle of May as the country's currency, the ruble, continues to give economists fits. The ruble's value has plunged due not only to western sanctions, but a precipitous fall in oil prices. We knew these factors were already impacting the auto industry there, as Ford reported in its 2014 earnings statement, and now they're forcing GM to cut production at the factory, shown above, that is responsible for production of the Chevrolet Cruze and Opel Astra. Meanwhile, Automotive News is citing Russian outlet Kommersant as saying that GM has hiked its prices in the country by an average of 20 percent over the past two months. While a GM spokesman confirmed the St. Petersburg plant would be shut down for the two-month span reported by Kommersant and AN, he would not confirm the price increase. News Source: Automotive News - sub. req.Image Credit: Alexander Nikolayev / AFP / Getty Images Earnings/Financials Plants/Manufacturing Chevrolet GM Opel opel astra
Texas sues GM, saying it tricked customers into sharing driving data sold to insurers
Wed, Aug 14 2024Texas filed a lawsuit Tuesday against GM over years of alleged abuse of customers' data and trust. New car owners were presented with a "confusing and highly misleading" process that was implied to be for their safety, but "was no more than a deceptively designed sales flow" that surrendered their data for GM to sell. The suit contends that at no point was selling driving data ever even suggested as a possibility, putting GM in violation of the state's consumer protection laws. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is seeking a jury trial and at least $10,000 per offense (every GM car sold in the state since 2015) and a hefty add-on of $250,000 in cases where the victim was over 65. Texas seems to be flying high after a recent $1.4 billion settlement from Meta over other privacy concerns. This may well be a way to solve any pending budgetary issues in the Lone Star State.
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.