1994 Camaro Z28 383 Stroker on 2040-cars
Hamlin, New York, United States
Engine:383 stroker motor
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Camaro
Trim: Z28 Coupe 2-Door
Options: T-TOPS
Power Options: Power Locks, Power Windows
Drive Type: 6 speed
Mileage: 14,213
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: simpson race seats black
You are looking at a 1994 camaro z28 build to the hilt.. I drove this car for two years sumer time only it had around 11500 miles on then made it into a watkins glen road course car to have a lil bit of fun.. I did drive this car on the road to as well, not much as its so damn load you had to creep in towns all the time lol..
This car has not seen a drop of salt in any of its year all bolts and under side is like it rolled off the show room floor. i Have some of the dash parts for the car not much as you can see in the pics i gutted the inside out to make it lite as i could.. I do have the lights and that kind of stuff for the most part..
Now lets try the motor been a long time. Well 1998 i blew the org one up and had FARMER AUTOMOTTIVE build me a 383 race stroker motor. all said and done the motor dynoed 465 HP at the crank.. that was in 1999. i drove the car on the road not the track for about 700 miles then the car sat in my garage covered till 3-20-13 all cyl were foged befor i put it away.. put gas in it fule pump shot thats life sat 13 year put new fule pump in three turns of the key fired right up.
The motor is a 383 strocker motor dynoed 465 hp at 6500 rpms at crank, motor has 6in callies fored crank , air flow reseach heads stage 2, wish i had the build sheet i have lil over $10500 in the motor it self. trans is a 6 speed with a hurst short throw shifter in it..
17 in Einki race wheels and 17x275x40 goodrich r-1s on them.
subframe connectors & G brace weled in.
koni double adjust shocks.race seats and roll bar.
4 point 3 in harnesses both seats no back seats..
TA aluminum differential girdle lock cover.
All race trailing arms and pan hand rod.
Hypertech programed the prom in it.
stainless steel exhaust headers with 1.75 primarys, and no cats redused back pressure by 75%
Red line lube all around car.
This car can be put on the road pre 1997 laws hehe may want to change out the pipes on it as it so damn loud it sounds like a nascar....
ASK FOR BILL 585-739-1803 HAPPY BIDDING....
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
1969 chevrolet camaro z28 non documented van nuys built 302v8 4sp excellent cond(US $32,995.00)
1974 camaro lt 355 nitrous street drag
1967 camaro convertible custom pro touring hot rod project car
1968 camaro project pro street drag classic pro touring
1981 camaro z28 true oregon barn find 99340 miles runs gr8!
Original 1981 camaro z28 like new in & out! red & silver 5.7 l & auto 23k miles!
Auto Services in New York
Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Vk Auto Repair ★★★★★
Village Auto Body Works Inc ★★★★★
TOWING BROOKLYN TODAY.COM ★★★★★
Total Performance Incorporated ★★★★★
Tom & Arties Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Weekly Recap: Chevy and Alfa plot comeback strategies
Sat, Jun 27 2015Chevrolet and Alfa Romeo were two of the 20th Century's most iconic automotive brands. Chevy embodied America's post-war power and confidence. Alfa was the definition of the stylish Italian sports car. They reached halcyon heights in the 1950s and '60s, before declining precipitously amid new competition, changing consumer tastes, and uneven corporate management. Both say 2015 is the start of something better, and this week Chevy and Alfa laid out ambitious plans and showcased new cars that they hope will make them more relevant this year, and in the coming years. Each brand sits at its own crossroads, and their paths forward are as different as the Chevy Cruze and the Alfa Romeo Giulia. Chevy is still a sales beast, as evidenced by its volume of 4.8 million vehicles sold around the world last year. Chevy executives are fond of saying one of their cars is sold every seven seconds, which illustrates the strength and reach of a car brand that is the fourth largest in the world. "Make no mistake about it, we are a brand for the people," said General Motors North America president Alan Batey. But he wants consumers to want to buy a Chevy for its design and technology, not simply because it's affordable. That starts with all Chevys now featuring a distinctive a family look, with sporty cues from the Corvette or strong lines that riff on the Silverado pickup. "We want people to fall in lust with our cars," said Mike Pevovar, executive design director for Chevy passenger cars. "That initial emotional attraction has to be right on the exterior, and that's where form comes into play." Chevy is also loading up its cars, like the freshly unveiled 2016 Chevy Cruze, with technology to appeal to a younger crowd that prizes connectivity. The Cruze will offer Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with its MyLink infotainment system, and OnStar with 4G LTE and wifi. Seeking out younger buyers is also sound business practice: Millennials now outnumber Baby Boomers as the largest single age group in the United States. Younger buyers also can improve a brand's image, which is another area where Chevy would like to improve. Chevy ranks 82nd on Interbrand's Best Global Brand's list, behind 11 other automakers. Apple is No. 1. "We need our own variation of the Genius Bar," Batey said. 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia View 3 Photos Meanwhile, Alfa is in different shape.
Porsche, Jaguar continue dominance in 2015 JD Power APEAL study
Wed, Jul 22 2015The top of JD Power's 2015 APEAL Study has not changed much in the last year. Porsche remains No. 1 with Jaguar nipping at its heels, although both premium brands saw their overall score fall compared to 2014. For those that need a refresher, the APEAL Study looks at how "gratifying" a vehicle is to own and drive, rating cars and brands on a 1,000-point scale. The industry average for 2015 has increased from 794 to 798, while the total number of automakers that finished above the curve increased from 16 to 20. While Porsche and Jaguar finished at the top, their scores dropped eight and seven points, respectively, to 874 and 855. The top "non-premium" brand was Mini, which scored an impressive 825, up from 795. If the BMW-owned British marque is still a bit too premium for your tastes, last year's non-premium winner, Hyundai, did climb five points and is this year's runner up. At the opposite end of the scale, Smart sits at the very bottom of the rankings, with a score of 683 (it didn't appear on the 2014 rankings). Fiat also dropped, from fourth worst in 2014 to second worst in 2015, despite the 500 being named most appealing city car. Subaru made an impressive climb, from third worst to seventh, falling just 10 points shy of the industry average and two points south of the non-premium average. In the individual vehicle segments, eight brands earned multiple awards, with Ford, Chevrolet, and Porsche earning three apiece. Surprise segment victories included the new Ford Expedition, which beat out Chevy's popular Suburban. The Infiniti QX80 bested the likes of the Cadillac Escalade and Range Rover for best large luxury SUV, and the Dodge Challenger beat its muscle car rivals from Ford and Chevy. Most of the victories, though, were quite predictable. The Mazda6 and CX-5 took wins for the midsize sedan and compact SUV categories respectively, while the Volkswagen Golf captured the compact car win. The Ford F-150 won the large pickup category, while the Porsche Cayman was named most appealing compact premium sporty car. Check out the official release on the 2015 APEAL Study, available below, from JD Power. 2015 U.S. APEAL Study Results The latest safety-related technologies are among the drivers of customer satisfaction with new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S.
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.