1973 Camaro Typ Lt, 1984 Z-28 5 Speed on 2040-cars
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Body Type:2 DOOR
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:350
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Camaro
Trim: LT AND Z-28
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Drive Type: REAR WHEEL DRIVE
Mileage: 99,999
Sub Model: TYPE LT AND Z-28
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: SILVER AND BLACK
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Black
ATTENTION, YOU ARE BIDDING ON THIS PAIR OF CAMAROS. YOU BUY ONE YOU BUY BOTH. THE 1973 IS A 1 OWNER CAR THAT I HAVE ALL OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION. THIS CAR HAS EXTENSIVE RUST THROUGHOUT THE CAR. WITH IT WILL COME 2 EXTRA DOOR SHELLS AND 1/4 PANEL ROCKER COMBINATIONS. THESE ARE OFF OF A 1979 TRANSAM AND I WAS TOLD IT IS ALL THE SAME SHEETMETAL. I MIGHT BE ABLE TO PUT MY HANDS ON AN ADDITIONAL HOOD FOR $175.00, HOWEVER I DO NOT THINK IT IS NEEDED. THE RADIATOR AND CARBURATOR HAVE BEEN REMOVED FOR THE START OF A"BACKYARD" RESTORATION THAT NEVER TRANSPIRED. I HAVE THE CARBURATOR BUT I DO NOT HAVE THE RADIATOR. THE A/C CONDESOR IS STILL MOUNTED. THE 1984 Z-28 IS A RATHER RARE COMBINATION BEING Z-28 WITH T-TOPS AND 5 SPEED. THE BODY IS EXTREMELY STRAIGHT AND SOLID. IT HAS AN UNKNOWN "HOTROD" MOTOR IN IT AND THE THE ONLY THING KEEPING IT FROM RUNNING IS GETTING THE IGNITION SWITCH HOOKED PROPERLY TO THE STARTER. THIS IS THE BEST I CAN TELL. PLEASE CALL MIKE AT 540 353-2269 FOR QUESTIONS, I DO NOT CHECK E-MAIL OFTEN SO PLEASE CALL IF YOU ARE A SERIOUS CANDIDATE. I AM IN VIRGINIA, SO PLEASE KEEP THE TIME IN MIND, IF YOU MISS ME LEAVE A MESSAGE AND I WILL CALL YOU RIGHT BACK. THANKS, AND GOOD LUCK.
On Feb-23-13 at 07:56:31 PST, seller added the following information:
ATTENTION! ATTENTION! ATTENTION! DONT LOSE THE DEAL SOMEBODY IS WITHIN ROCK THROWING DISTANCE OF THE RESERVE, YOU WILL HAVE TO BREAK THE $3200.00 MARK THOUGH. THEN IT IS HIGHEST BIDDER WINS. THAMKS, MIKE
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
Auto Services in Virginia
Whitten Brothers Mazda ★★★★★
West Broad Audi ★★★★★
Watkin`s Garage ★★★★★
Virginia Auto Ctr ★★★★★
Victory Lane Auto Sales ★★★★★
Van`s Garage ★★★★★
Auto blog
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd
The 2014 Chevrolet SS sedan is for drivers who value performance above all else
Sat, 16 Feb 2013The car you see above is the 2014 Chevrolet SS, and it's important both because it is the first rear-wheel-drive performance sedan from Chevy in 17 years, and because it will be the nameplate the brand uses on NASCAR tracks all across the country starting this year.
Though it wears a name as American as baseball and apple pie, the machine was actually designed and built in Australia, sharing most of its parts with the brand-new VF-model Holden Commodore. That said, the basic chassis bits are shared with other Chevrolet models like the Camaro and Caprice Police Patrol Vehicle.
While Chevrolet is happy to sell a Malibu or Impala to anyone looking for a mainstream family sedan, but the SS is reserved for buyers interested first and foremost in performance. Most sedans sold these days are front-wheel drive, which is great for everyday driving and when the weather goes bad, but the SS is instead a rear-wheel-drive vehicle aimed at enthusiasts who love to drive and who prefer speed and performance above all else.