1969 Chevrolet Camaro 1969 Rsss Tribute on 2040-cars
Driftwood, Texas, United States
Just email me at: penniprralon@uk7.net .
SHE HAS A BUILT 350.. AUTOMATIC TRANNY.. 12 BOLT POSI.
PAINT IS A NEWER BEAUTIFUL DEEP SILVER WITH BLACK RALLY STRIPES. STRONG AND SMOOTH RUNNING 350 ENGINE
ALUMINUM INTAKE..ROCHESTER QUADRAJET CARBURETOR..
PERFORMANCE HEADERS..FULL DUAL EXHAUST...NICE RUMBLE!
SHE HAS 12 BOLT POSI REAREND…POWER STEERING…
FRONT POWER DISK BRAKES..NICE STANDARD BLACK INTERIOR.. VERY SOLID BODY..GOOD TIGHT DOOR GAPS.. UNDERCARRIAGE IS
GOOD..GOOD FRAME RAILS..FLOORS ARE DECENT, LOOKS LIKE THEY WERE REPLACED SECTION BY SECTION OVER THE YEARS USING
SOME NON-OEM METAL…COULD USE SOME UNDERCOATING IN MY OPINION. TRUNK AREA AND PANS ARE SOLID.
STEEL COWL HOOD…HAS FRONT AND REAR SPOILERS..
NICE AFTERMARKET 18INCH WHEELS AND TIRES …..GREAT LOOK AND LOWERED STANCE!!
OVERALL THIS IS A VERY NICE 1969 CAMARO THAT YOU CAN ENJOY NOW. STRONG RUNNING 350 ENGINE, AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION,
POWER STEERING, POWER DISC BRAKES, 12 BOLT POSI, LIGHTS, TAIL LIGHTS, BRAKE LIGHTS WORK AS THEY SHOULD. HIDEAWAY
LIGHTS STILL NEED TO BE SETUP WITH VACUM OR ELECTRONIC KIT, WHICHEVER YOU CHOOSE TO GO WITH.
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
- 1969 chevrolet camaro(US $21,500.00)
- 1969 chevrolet camaro(US $11,700.00)
- Chevrolet: camaro z28(US $8,900.00)
- 1969 chevrolet camaro(US $14,900.00)
- 1969 chevrolet camaro(US $12,900.00)
- 1969 chevrolet camaro pro-touring fuel injected lt1 coupe show & go(US $14,000.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Xtreme Customs Body and Paint ★★★★★
Woodard Paint & Body ★★★★★
Whitlock Auto Kare & Sale ★★★★★
Wesley Chitty Garage-Body Shop ★★★★★
Weathersbee Electric Co ★★★★★
Wayside Radiator Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Chevy Corvette Stingray order guide hits the web
Mon, 15 Apr 2013The official debut of the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray is only part of the excitement for fans of Chevy's virtuoso sportscar. Although we got to see the car and some of its preliminary specs in Detroit and Geneva, there is still no word on pricing and some of the juicier data points we've been waiting for - such as confirmed power output, EPA estimated mileage figures and performance numbers. Until then, CorvetteBlogger has gotten its hands on the order guide for the coupe version of the car - in both base and Z51 iterations - revealing tidbits like standard and optional features and available color combinations.
Some other new details made it onto the order guide, such as our first interior specs for the coupe including slightly less hip room and headroom, more shoulder room and the same amount of legroom. To see the full order guide, head on over to CorvetteBlogger. From what we can gather, it sounds like more information will be revealed on April 25 during a party at the Corvette Museum, and for those sun worshipers patiently waiting for a convertible, it would appear you've got another model year to wait through.
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
Camaro spy shots show subtly different grille, front fascia
Sun, 03 Feb 2013It looks like there some changes in store for the Chevrolet Camaro - the only thing is that we just don't know what Chevy has up its sleeve. Looking at these spy shots, we'd initially be inclined to think that there is just a minor facelift or a new special edition, but upon closer inspection, there are a few oddities about this car that definitely have us intrigued.
The most obvious difference on this prototype is the slightly restyled front fascia with a smaller lower air inlet and the two-bar grille. Then we get to some of the car's mysterious details. For starters, this fascia has the SS vent above the grille, but it looks to be blocked off. Granted this could just be a one-off piece used for testing. What really piqued our interest was at the rear of the car where it has quad exhaust outlets that are used on the ZL1. Could this be the LS7-powered Camaro that we reported on back in December?
At this point, your guess is as good as ours as to what we're looking at here, so let us know in the comments what you think this could be.