1967 Chevrolet Camaro 6-speed Lt4-powered on 2040-cars
Sacramento, California, United States
The car is finished in white and features modifications including rear quarter panel exhaust cut-outs, a custom hood with vents, a billet rear spoiler with exposed hardware, plasma cut front grilles, and flush-fit front and rear windows. Additional features consist of a fabricated front spoiler, custom tail panel, chrome bumpers and door handles, LED headlamps with a yellow tint, LED taillamps, fog lamps, and 3D printed mirrors with integrated turn signals.
The bronze-finished 19″ Forgeline RB1 monoblock wheels are mounted with Michelin Pilot Sport Cup tires measuring 305/30 up front and 325/30 out back. Braking is provided by power-assisted 14″ Wilwood disc brakes at all four corners. The car features a Speedtech Performance suspension with an Extreme subframe and rear torque arm along with RideTech single adjustable coilovers.
The cabin is said to have been designed and crafted by Sid Chavers Company of Santa Clara, California, and features a white-painted floor and black leather upholstery on the seats, door panels, and rear seat delete panels. Equipment includes painted Corbeau carbon fiber racing seats with houndstooth inserts, climate control, 3D printed interior components, power windows, leather door handle pulls, custom door trim panels, and an integrated roll cage. The dashboard features a center stack that houses five toggle switches and custom air vents along with dimpled footrests, and a suede-covered dashboard and package shelf.
The quick-release Sparco steering wheel frames a Dakota Digital 160-mph speedometer, 8k-rpm tachometer, and auxiliary gauges.
The supercharged 6.2-liter LT4 Chevrolet Performance crate engine was rated at 650 horsepower and 650 lb-ft of torque. Features include a Wegner front serpentine drive, custom air intake, direct fuel injection, a 1.7L Eaton R1740 TVS supercharger, long-tube headers, and a dry-sump oiling system. The engine bay is fitted with a custom coolant tank, an aluminum radiator with a heat exchanger, and billet hinges.
Power is sent to the rear wheels through a Bowler Performance Transmissions six-speed manual transmission and a 9-inch rear axle.
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
1973 chevrolet camaro z28(US $24,600.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro z28 4-speed(US $75,300.00)
2011 chevrolet camaro intimidator 6-speed(US $52,500.00)
1973 chevrolet camaro 350cid 5.7 liter 4 spd 4 wheel disc(US $36,754.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro ss a/c power steering & brakes hounds tooth interior(US $45,000.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro convertible 4 speed, cold ac(US $12,793.80)
Auto Services in California
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Woodland Motors Chevrolet Buick Cadillac GMC ★★★★★
Willy`s Auto Repair Shop ★★★★★
Westside Body & Paint ★★★★★
Westcoast Autobahn ★★★★★
Westcoast Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.
Reuss says GM diesel plans are still on pace
Fri, Oct 16 2015General Motors is not going to let Volkswagen's diesel emissions scandal ruin its plans for a new line of efficient, torquey oil-burners, the company's Executive Vice President Mark Reuss said at a recent press event. "No way," Reuss responded when asked about cancelling the upcoming diesel-powered Chevrolet Cruze and other vehicles. "The Cruze Diesel is too good not to do it." Slated for 2017, the compact is just the latest member of a diesel offensive that initially kicked off with the first Cruze Diesel and most recently saw the introduction of the oil-burning Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon. Reuss also reassured those in attendance that there was "no delay" in development of Cadillac's diesel lineup. Cadillac is working on a line of four- and six-cylinder turbodiesels for Europe. They'd make their way into the US market, too, eventually. "It's a question of timing," Reuss said, according to Car and Driver. Volkswagen's diesel emissions scandal has caused automakers across the globe to at least reanalyze their diesel strategy. Jaguar Land Rover, which is preparing several diesel-powered models for the US market, went on record late last month to reaffirm its commitment to diesel. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2014 Chevrolet Cruze Turbo Diesel: Quick Spin View 14 Photos News Source: Car and DriverImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Seyth Miersma / AOL Green Cadillac Chevrolet GM Diesel Vehicles
Porsche, Jaguar continue dominance in 2015 JD Power APEAL study
Wed, Jul 22 2015The top of JD Power's 2015 APEAL Study has not changed much in the last year. Porsche remains No. 1 with Jaguar nipping at its heels, although both premium brands saw their overall score fall compared to 2014. For those that need a refresher, the APEAL Study looks at how "gratifying" a vehicle is to own and drive, rating cars and brands on a 1,000-point scale. The industry average for 2015 has increased from 794 to 798, while the total number of automakers that finished above the curve increased from 16 to 20. While Porsche and Jaguar finished at the top, their scores dropped eight and seven points, respectively, to 874 and 855. The top "non-premium" brand was Mini, which scored an impressive 825, up from 795. If the BMW-owned British marque is still a bit too premium for your tastes, last year's non-premium winner, Hyundai, did climb five points and is this year's runner up. At the opposite end of the scale, Smart sits at the very bottom of the rankings, with a score of 683 (it didn't appear on the 2014 rankings). Fiat also dropped, from fourth worst in 2014 to second worst in 2015, despite the 500 being named most appealing city car. Subaru made an impressive climb, from third worst to seventh, falling just 10 points shy of the industry average and two points south of the non-premium average. In the individual vehicle segments, eight brands earned multiple awards, with Ford, Chevrolet, and Porsche earning three apiece. Surprise segment victories included the new Ford Expedition, which beat out Chevy's popular Suburban. The Infiniti QX80 bested the likes of the Cadillac Escalade and Range Rover for best large luxury SUV, and the Dodge Challenger beat its muscle car rivals from Ford and Chevy. Most of the victories, though, were quite predictable. The Mazda6 and CX-5 took wins for the midsize sedan and compact SUV categories respectively, while the Volkswagen Golf captured the compact car win. The Ford F-150 won the large pickup category, while the Porsche Cayman was named most appealing compact premium sporty car. Check out the official release on the 2015 APEAL Study, available below, from JD Power. 2015 U.S. APEAL Study Results The latest safety-related technologies are among the drivers of customer satisfaction with new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S.