1967 - Chevrolet Camaro on 2040-cars
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
1967 Camaro RS. Color is a beautiful hugger orange with white rally stripes that has to be seen in person to be appreciated. Interior has also been very nicely done in black with no issues or tears in seats or dash whatsoever. 454 motor recently rebuilt (only couple thousand miles ago), with new components such as Edelbrock intake, holley carb., alternator and air cleaner. All turn signals, windshield wipers as well as the hideaway headlights(which have been converted to electric) work perfectly. Always starts right up, I would not hesitate to drive it anywhere, any distance. Trunk has recently been coated for protection and Torque thrust II alloy rims and Faulken tires set it off very nicely. It is not a show car, but a very, very nice driver, turns lots of heads and is rust free.
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
- 1969 - chevrolet camaro(US $11,000.00)
- 2010 - chevrolet camaro(US $29,000.00)
- 1991 - chevrolet camaro(US $7,000.00)
- 2002 - chevrolet camaro(US $7,000.00)
- 1971 - chevrolet camaro(US $9,000.00)
- 1967 - chevrolet camaro(US $13,000.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Walkers Auto Repair ★★★★★
Viking Imports Foreign Car Parts & Accessories Inc ★★★★★
Vans Tire & Automotive ★★★★★
Union Automotive Services Inc ★★★★★
Triangle Service ★★★★★
Todd`s Tire Service Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM issues stop-sale for 3 SUVs over incorrect MPG rating
Fri, May 13 2016This week, GM sent a memo to Chevy, GMC, and Buick dealers to tell them to stop selling three SUVS. The 2016 Chevy Traverse, the GMC Acadia, and the Buick Enclave all have EPA window stickers that show higher fuel economy ratings than the vehicles actually have. Unlike other recent – and very public – fuel economy ratings problems from VW and Mitsubishi, it doesn't seem like GM did anything wrong with the testing for these vehicles, it just misprinted the labels. New labels are being printed and should arrive at dealerships this weekend and early next week. After that, the SUVs will be able to be sold and delivered again. The official fuel economy rating for the three SUVs are all the same. The correct numbers for the all-wheel drive versions are 17 miles per gallon combined, 15 city, and 22 highway. The stickers say the SUVs get 17/24/19. The front-wheel driver models were also incorrectly labeled, and the total number of affected vehicles is 59,823. In the memo, GM said the problem was caused by an "inadvertent error," Automotive News says. GM is working with the EPA to solve the issue. We have asked GM for a comment on the mistake and will update this post if we hear back. Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Automotive News – sub. req. Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GM GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse
Survey says $25k barrier is a problem for EVs
Sun, 01 Dec 2013
The majority of consumers are more or less priced out of the market.
Electric cars are gaining popularity with the general public, but are they still too expensive? According to a survey 1,084 consumers by Navigant Research, a consulting firm located in Boulder, CO, 71 percent want their next car to cost under $25,000, while 41 percent won't go a cent above $20K. Looks like people are even thriftier than we'd originally thought.
2014 Corvette Stingray meets Tesla Model S in drag strip showdown
Wed, Jan 29 2014They come from two different worlds and have little in common. The Tesla Model S P85 is the sportiest version of this paradigm-punching sedan from California, while the 2014 Corvette Stingray Z51 is a performance-enhanced version of Michigan's recently-updated sports car stalwart. The West Coast car seats five adults and eats electrons like Popeye eats spinach, the Easterner has two passenger places and, surprisingly, sips gasoline like one might bourbon. An attribute they do happen to share is extreme quickness. This similarity is all the excuse Drag Times needed to set the vehicles beside each other at the Palm Beach International Raceway for a bit of mano-a-mano quarter-mile combat. Fortunately enough, cameras were rolling for each of two bouts down the blacktop and the results recorded for our edification and enlightenment. The winner? We won't spoil it for you, but let's just say it's really, really close. How close? Scroll below and watch the video for yourself. Just be warned, the results may surprise you. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.