1962 G.m.c C/k 1500 Costum Cab S/b Stepside P/u on 2040-cars
Fort Jones, California, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:350 HIGH OUTPUT G.M. CRATE ENGINE
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:PREMIUM GAS
For Sale By:BY OWNER
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C/K Pickup 1500
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): 2 DOOR CUSTOM CAB
Trim: BIG CHROME GRILL
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 2 WHEEL REAR DRIVE
Options: LEATHER RESTOREED BENCH SEAT, Leather Seats
Mileage: 32,006
Safety Features: N/A NO SEAT BELTS EVEN
Sub Model: C/K 1500
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: SILVER AND BLACK
Number of Cylinders: 8
Disability Equipped: No
THIS IS ONE PRETTY NICE POTENTIAL SLAM DOWN STREET TRUCK . ALL THE GLASS IS UN BROKEN EXCEPT FOR DRIVERS SIDE WINDSHIELD. LIKE I SAID BENCH SEAT HAS BEEN REFURBISHED ON THE INSIDE AND RECOVERED WITH BLACK LEATHER. THIS TRUCK HAS AN ADJUSTABLE TORSION BAR FRONT END. AND 5 LEAF ,LEAF SPRING REAR END . THE FLOOR IN THE STEP SIDE BED HAS NO HOLES ALL THE WAY THROUGH IT ,BUT TO BE PRISTINE THEY NEED REPLACING. THIS IS A STEP SIDE THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE SPARE TIRE CUT IN THE FENDER BEHIND DRIVERS DOOR ,IT'S A FULL FENDER .THE FLOOR INSIDE THE CAB SEEMS SOLID WITH NO WROUGHT. THERE IS NO REAR BUMPER BUT THERE IS A FRAME ATTACHED TRAILER HITCH UNFORTUNATLY MUSTANG TAILLIGHTS HAVE BEEN POORLY INSERTED IN BACK PART OF REAR FENDERS. THE FRONT BUMPER AND GRILL ARE ALL CHROME AND IN FARE CONDITION . THE USUAL CANCER RUST SPOTS ON LOWER BACK PART OF FRONT FENDERS HAVE BEEN FIXED WITH BONDO OR FIBERGLAS AND LOOK PRETTY GOOD , BUT MORE THAN LIKELY NEED TO BE CUT OUT AND REPAIRED CORRECTLY! I DOUBT THIS TRUCK WAS AN ORIGINAL V-8 TRUCK, BUT SOMEWHERE ALONG IT'S HISTORY IT RECEIVED ONE, AND AT THAT TIME RECEIVED A TWO BARREL CARB A AND SINGLE Y PIPE EXHAUST. WHICH IS A CRYING SHAME SINCE SOMEONE RIGHT BEFORE WE GOT IT PUT A HIGH OUTPUT G.M. SHORT BLOCK IN IT AND DID NOT CHANGE THESE FEATURES WHICH ARE STILL ON IT TO THIS DAY! THE MOTOR ALONE AS A SHORT BLOCK COST AT LEAST $I500.00 MINIMUM FROM GM AT THE TIME. WE NEW THE PERSON WE BOUGHT THE TRUCK FROM RATHER WELL AND HE SAID AT THE TIME OF HIS PURCHASE OF THIS VEHICLE THE MOTOR WAS BRAND NEW . HE DROVE THE TRUCK AS A DAILY DRIVER FOR A YEAR SO I FIGURE IT HAS LESS THAN 20,000 MILES ON IT BEFORE HE WAS MURDERED BY A FATALLY ATTRACTED TEEN BOY , WHO'S EX GIRLFRIEND HE WAS DATING. MY PARTNER AN I BOUGHT IT FROM THE MURDERED GUYS SISTER WHO THE TRUCK WAS LEFT TO IN HIS WILL. SHE HAD IT FOR ABOUT 6 OR 8 MONTHS , COULDN'T DRIVE IT AND WOULD BREAK INTO TEARS EVERY TIME SHE LOOKED AT IT! SO WE MADE HER AN OFFER WHICH SHE GLADLY TOOK. MY PARTNER DAILY DROVE IT FOR BOUT ANOTHER YEAR WHILE WE STARTED TO RESTORE IT , BUT THE FACT WE BOTH HAD 5OR 6 OTHER CARS WE WERE RESTORING AT THE SAME TIME IT DIDN'T PROGRESS TO FAR!! THE ECONOMY DIVED , GAS WENT SKY HIGH AND MONEY WAS TIGHT. SO THE TRUCK GOT PARKED . SO FROM THERE BETWEEN THE RATS SQUIRRELS AND ANY THING ELSE THAT EATS THE INSULATION OFF WIRE IT CAME TO THE POINT WHERE THE UNDER HOOD WIRE HARNESS AND UNDER DASH WIRE HARNESS GOT MUNCHED! THE TRUCK MOTOR STILL STARTS AND RUNS EXCELLENT BUT WON'T START BY THE KEY! I BITCH AT HIM FOR LETTING THIS HAPPEN SO BEING A RESPONSIBLE FRIEND SAID '' I'LL TAKE CARE OF IT '' HE HIRED SOME IMPOSTER , POSER, WHO SAID NO PROB I CAN WIRE IT! NOT!!! THIS GUY WAS A CLOWN , BUT TO TELL U THE TRUTH NO HARM NO FOUL ,THIS TRUCKS WIRING IS NO WORSE THAN WHEN THE RODENTS DID IT IN ! IN THE BEGINNING! SO THAT PRETTY WELL COVERS ALL I CAN THINK OF AS FAR AS DESCRIPTIVE SPECS GO ! MY PARTNER AND FRIEND IS PROPERTY MANAGING THE LAND I OWN IN SIS-Q CO. WHERE THE TRUCK IS LOCATED. I'VE SINCE MOVED TO SANTA BARBRA CO. HENCE THE ADDRESS ON MY EBAY ACCOUNT! WE WANT TO USE THE 500.00 DOWN PAID TO PAYPAL! SO EBAY IS GUARANTEED THERE'S WITH THE REMAINING BALANCE PAID AT TIME OF PICKUP! HE WILL BE BROKERING THE DEAL FOR THE BOTH OF US EXCEPT FOR THE DOWN PAYMENT WHICH WILL GO INTO MY PAYPAL ACCOUNT. THE PRICE OF THE TRUCK IS $3600.00 AND NOT REALLY NEGOTIABLE ! BUT HELL IT NEVER HURTS TO TRY AND HE WILL HANDLE THAT ! HIS PHONE ## IS 530-643 -3508 ASK 4 MIKE AND TELL HIM YOUR INTERESTED IN THE 62 G.M.C., SINCE MY KNOWLEDGE ON CHEVY'S AND GMC'S IS FAR VASTER THAN HIS EMAIL ME FOR ANY TECH OR SPEC QUESTIONS ! IF U WANT TO TALK MONEY AND PRICE CALL HIM AT THE ## I POSTED . WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED BEFORE BY BUYERS OFF CL LIST SO I DO PREFER LOCAL PICKUP ,THAT WAY U SEE WHAT YOUR BUYING! I CANT BELIEVE PEOPLE BUY CARS ON LINE SITE UNSEEN! IF U ARE HAVING A SHIPPER PICK IT UP FOR U , WE WILL NOT ACCEPT ANYTHING BUT CASH! IF U WANT TO USE ANY OTHER FORM OF PAYMENT WE WILL HOLD THE VEHICLE FOR ANOTHER 45 DAYS OR MORE OR UNTIL YOUR CHECK CLEARS AND BANK SEZ IT'S GOOD ! YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A SERIOUS BUYER BUT SPAMMERS DON'T EVEN BOTHER WE KNOW ALL THE TRICKS! THANX GREG
Chevrolet C/K Pickup 1500 for Sale
1930 chevrolet 1 1/2 ton pickup. show quality restoration. beautiful. must see!!
1993 chevrolet c/k 1500 reg cab 117.5 wb 4wd
1970 chevrolet c/k series 1500 super charged custom truck(US $39,500.00)
Rust free from georgia new paint bfg a/ts unmolested short bed overdrive 4x4 a/c
Show winner customized chevy pickup loaded immaculate <20,000 miles(US $15,000.00)
1983 chevy truck ~355 ~short bed
Auto Services in California
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Woodland Motors Chevrolet Buick Cadillac GMC ★★★★★
Willy`s Auto Repair Shop ★★★★★
Westside Body & Paint ★★★★★
Westcoast Autobahn ★★★★★
Westcoast Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy Crossvolt name kept alive in new trademark application
Fri, Dec 26 2014In April 2011 General Motors submitted a trademark application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the word "Crossvolt." In November of this year, the application expired for lack of a statement of use. But in August of this year, GM applied again for the same trademark, leading some to believe that it intends to apply the name to a vehicle. That vehicle could explain the mule in sliced-and-diced Chevrolet Orlando bodywork caught in several spy shots this year, theorized to be some kind of Toyota Prius V or Ford C-Max Hybrid competitor; or it could be a production version of the Chevrolet Volt MP5 concept showed off at the Beijing Motor Show in 2010, which was about the same size as the Chevy Orlando. Or it could be none of those things – but the fact that Chevrolet is keeping it current makes us believe it will be... something. Featured Gallery Beijing 2010: Chevrolet Volt MPV5 concept View 13 Photos News Source: Fox News, Trademarkia Green Chevrolet GM Crossover Hybrid trademark uspto
First 2014 Chevy Corvette Stingray spotted crashed in the wild
Tue, 12 Feb 2013This restyled blue 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray is wearing manufacturer plates, and it appears to be the same one seen around the internet in various pictures lately. This crash is likely not part of the Chevrolet testing regimen, however. Digital Corvettes forum member gpetry posted the shot with a note: "got this picture e-mailed from a friend in Arizona last week..." No circumstances are given, other than the incident occurred in the thick of a set of curvy roads, and the coupe ping-ponged off a guardrail and into the rock wall. Hopefully everyone involved in the incident walked away.
It may not be a pretty thing to see, a crashed sports car that's not even available for sale yet, but rest easy. Many pre-production cars are used for development and then unceremoniously crushed and scrapped, anyway. If that's the case here, that makes this wrecked 'Vette less of a tragedy and more of a case of exceptional efficiency.
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.