Original Numbers Matching on 2040-cars
Ottawa, Illinois, United States
|
Up for your consideration: an original 1972 Chevrolet c-10 survivor pickup, The truck was delivered to Zscheile Motor Company in Burlington Kansas in December of 1971.... the truck remained there until the second owner bought it and hauled it to Maryland to drive and enjoy it... Unfortunately he passed away a couple years ago and I bought it from his son in law... I purchased it for my father as a surprise gift.... surprise to me my dad didn't want it. So you would be the third owner.... This truck is very cool especially with nostalgic vehicles being the rage right now...the paint is faded and is has chips scuffs and a small amount of rust on the drivers door the rest of the front end and cab are very solid. The only issue of rust is rust through around the inner wheel wells in the bed you can't see from the side you must look in the bed of the truck. It is a rear leaf and front coil suspension truck with newer rear leaf packs in back... and the suspension is in great shape. I put new brakes on rear with new drums and in front... rotors new calipers and pads and of course wheel bearings are new. the ball joints are solid and steering tight. I ran new brake lines and fuel where needed...I wanted this truck to have no issues for years. It has a newer radiator and water pump and fuel pump... I have the original carb air cleaner and points distributer this truck is truly a survivor... Glass is all good & interior complete.... lights work everything functions as it should.... the gentleman before me was almost done with an aftermarket A/C system... only needs a small amount to finish. The engine is the higher horse power one and runs very well...numbers match and still has the diagnostic sticker to prove it The 350 turbo trans shifts and drives excellent and has been rebuilt.... Tires are all good. New exhaust with magnaflow mufflers with the muscle car sound we all hear on tv... I have driven this truck 1 to 2 times a week and it is fun to drive with a lot of hp to get up and go! It is always a head turner and usually have people walking around it where I stop. I have another car that has to get finished and with my dad turning it down... I just want to sell it... if things were different... it would stay... I really enjoy driving it. I have original paperwork all the way back to the original dealership that sold it new... YOU CAN DRIVE THIS TRUCK HOME... NO warranty you must come look at it to make offers... bring cash... no bull on the you will pay me extra for shipping garbage.... I Don't deliver... shipping can be considered truck must be paid for first....along with shipping. truck is for sale locally...reserve the right to end auction early. The best form of payment is cash... no trades or checks could do a wire transfer from your bank to mine... truck goes nowhere till my bank says I am good to go.
|
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
1966 chevrolet c-10 lwb pickup original 283 3-speed mostly original truck
1974 chevrolet c10 pickup truck original unrestored survivor all paperwork
1967 chevrolet swb big block pickup 1/2 ton
1965 chevrolet c10 pickup long bed fleetside, 4.6l patina, shop truck, rat rod(US $5,000.00)
1976 chevrolet c-10 silverado step side pick up(US $9,850.00)
Chevy truck c10 custom deluxe 1985 chevrolet big10 restored, no reserve sale
Auto Services in Illinois
USA Muffler & Brakes ★★★★★
The Auto Shop ★★★★★
Super Low Foods ★★★★★
Spirit West Motor Carriage Body Repair ★★★★★
South West Auto Repair & Mufflers ★★★★★
Sierra Auto Group ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.
Car and Driver reveals spy shots of mid-engine 2017 Corvette
Thu, Jan 8 2015Some news in the car world is perennial, and some is perennially wrong. Typically news about some upcoming mid-engined Chevy Corvette has fallen into the latter category, with rumors never yet generating a road car. This time could very well be different. Car and Driver has some exclusive photographs of what would appear to be a Corvette test mule with a mid-mounted engine. The car in question might look like a Holden SSV ute that's undergone some indelicate modification, but C/D editor Don Sherman assures that the bones of a C8 'Vette live within that crude bodywork. Sherman points to the closeness of the cabin to the front axle as clue number one of this car's mid-engine attitude, as well as the powertrain-sized space between the back of the seats and the rear axle. The roof and glasshouse are all clearly plucked from the current C7, and the gas tank filler positioned on the B-pillar is another huge clue. The buff book estimates that the mule points to a timeline for sale, even. Testing on this level could mean a mid-engined C8 ready for sale in as few as 20 months, or for the 2017 model year. Click over to Car and Driver to have a close look at this important set of spy photographs, as well as a rendering of what a finished C8 might ultimately look like
GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?
Fri, Jul 21 2017General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.









