Custom C-10 Chevy,only 3500 Miles,very Clean Truck on 2040-cars
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Let's start off with it is an eye catcher! This truck rides like new, there are no squeaks or rattles.
Create chevy 350, all Mallory ignition system,an plug wires, Edelbrock carb an intake. Edelbrock ceramic coated headers an full dual exhaust with flow master mufflers. Edelbrock mild street cam. Motor only has 3585 miles on it not a rebuild. The transmission is a 700r4. Has a b&m performance shift kit. Also a b&m ratcheting floor shifter. The transmission also only has 3585 miles on it but it is a rebuilt trans. Drive line has been upgraded with spicer u.joints. Rear end has newer ring an pinion. Rear leaf springs have brand new bushings. The rear end also has ssbc rear disk brake conversion.also only 3585 miles on it. Front suspension is all chassis tech,tubular upper and lower control arms,aluminum sway bar,lowering springs as we'll not cut springs,all bushings front and rear have 3585 miles on them. The front brake rotors are cross drilled. The wheels are 18 inch, tire are about 50% The fuel system is new as well,new gas tank,pump an filter. The interior is new,custom two tone orange And black,all the black is ostrich material very nicely done. Billet aluminum inserts threw out. All the gauges were brand new when the motor an trans went into the truck,so 3585 miles is what this truck actually has on it!! The windshield is brand new. All the rubber seals are new too. Now the paint and body...yes the truck is pretty and shinny.but this is the only complaint I have about this truck is the paint and body work. The paint has a couple chips one by the upper passenger side of the tail gate an one by the top of The driverside door. The prep work was not done the best it could have been there for in some areas it shows,in some areas the paint just doesn't lay flat little wavy.some of the panels don't line up as well as they should.the paint place was going out of business an they just put it together an shipped it out the door an no one to answer to...don't get me wrong the truck is beautiful but for time an money that went into motor and drive train,the paint and body work just doesn't add up. The truck starts first time and hauls ass,i just want to start another project. |
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
- 1972 chevrolet c10 4x4 fleet side. frame-off restoration/ truck has it all!
- 1969 custom 10 chevy truck
- 1966 red chevy stepside runs looks great 75,689 original mi barn kept.(US $15,500.00)
- 1961 chevy apache 20 longbed stepside big window
- Single cab, long bed, lowered
- 1969 chevy pickup truck c-10, rebuilt 350 w/ performace parts, long bed, 17's
Auto Services in Arizona
Vistoso Automotive ★★★★★
Vette Shoppe ★★★★★
Tempe Imports ★★★★★
Suntec Auto Glass & Tinting ★★★★★
Smarts Automotive ★★★★★
Real Fast Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
MotorWeek looks back at 1995 Chevy Tahoe, GMC Yukon
Sat, Jun 20 2015MotorWeek's Retro Review series gives us a nostalgic look back at some of the best sports cars and luxury sedans available in the 1980s and '90s. For its latest clip, the show shifts gears to remember the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon. Similar to the success of crossovers today, SUVs were tallying big sales and making big money for automakers in the mid-'90s. The Tahoe and Yukon filled slots in the market as steps down from the larger Suburban. These twins weren't wanting for space, though, with plenty of room to haul around a family. MotorWeek came away generally impressed too, and called the models some "of the better riding sport utilities we've ever experienced." This review comes with some jazzy, electric guitar licks to enjoy in the background.
NHTSA, IIHS, and 20 automakers to make auto braking standard by 2022
Thu, Mar 17 2016The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and virtually every automaker in the US domestic market have announced a pact to make automatic emergency braking standard by 2022. Here's the full rundown of companies involved: BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo (not to mention the brands that fall under each automaker's respective umbrella). Like we reported yesterday, AEB will be as ubiquitous in the future as traction and stability control are today. But the thing to note here is that this is not a governmental mandate. It's truly an agreement between automakers and the government, a fact that NHTSA claims will lead to widespread adoption three years sooner than a formal rule. That fact in itself should prevent up to 28,000 crashes and 12,000 injuries. The agreement will come into effect in two waves. For the majority of vehicles on the road – those with gross vehicle weights below 8,500 pounds – AEB will need to be standard equipment by September 1, 2022. Vehicles between 8,501 and 10,000 pounds will have an extra three years to offer AEB. "It's an exciting time for vehicle safety. By proactively making emergency braking systems standard equipment on their vehicles, these 20 automakers will help prevent thousands of crashes and save lives," said Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx said in an official statement. "It's a win for safety and a win for consumers." Read on for the official press release from NHTSA. Related Video: U.S. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles McLEAN, Va. – The U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA's 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept 1, 2022. Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Tesla Motors Inc., Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo Car USA.
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.