1967 Chevrolet C10 Shortbed Pickup on 2040-cars
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Low, wide and slick this short bed hauler demands your attention. The Slick Jet Black body is full of abundant reflections. Tastefully done and straight as an arrow. The black paint is close to perfect and I get compliments everytime I take it out. This truck has been lowered 2 inches in the front and 3 inches in the rear and rides on 18"Coys wheels with 255/55R18 tires. Power is provided by a 454 Big Block V8 equipped withEldelbrock4bbl carb, Edelbrock intake manifold,magnaflow dual exhaust and HEI ignition.Transferring the power is a 700R4 automatic overdrive transmission and GM 12 bolt rear. It is equipped with power steering,power disc brakes,tilt wheel and air conditioning. This truck was an older frame off restoration that was completely gone over 2000 miles ago. At that time it received new paint and upholstery,new tinted glass including a tinted slider for the small back window.It also received a new instrument panel with the factory tach and gauges and a tilt steering column with a custom steering wheel.Over $10,000 was spent in parts not counting paint and upholstery. The pictures don`t do this truck justice. It looks much sharper in person. I suggest that all interested bidders should come and take a look at this truck .
|
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
1971 chevrolet c-10 c10 short wide resto mod swb 350 v8 auto clean no reserve
1968 chevrolet c-10 short bed pickup / rat rod-hot rod project
1972 chevrolet c-10 bagged patina(US $27,500.00)
1972 chevy truck(US $5,900.00)
1966 chevy c10 truck short bed c14 v8 66 65 64 67 hot rod rat rod shortbed c-10(US $9,000.00)
1968 chevy c10 cst shortbed truck - fresh 350 w/ 200r4 overdrive
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
YBJ Auto Sales ★★★★★
West View Auto Body ★★★★★
Wengert`s Automotive ★★★★★
University Collision Center ★★★★★
Ultimate Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Stewart Collision Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Read This: Auto Extremist advocates for Corvette as brand with multiple models [w/poll]
Fri, 25 Jan 2013The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette really grinds Peter De Lorenzo's gears. Or, more accurately, the self-anointed Auto Extremist has an issue with what he sees as mismanagement of the legendary sports car by General Motors executives. In a new editorial on his website, De Lorenzo argues it's time to split Corvette off from Chevrolet to create an all-new brand, complete with a model range with at least three new takes on the sports car. Capable of fully leveraging the successes of the Corvette Racing program and brandishing the full might of GM's technical prowess, the Corvette brand would theoretically give Porsche something to sweat over.
Sure, that sounds like a party, but given GM's troubled track record when it comes to launching (let alone managing) brands, we say that's slippery slope that could just as easily end with the whole Corvette franchise in the scrap bin. Either way, the notion is certainly an interesting one. Head over to Auto Extremist to take in the full editorial, and then let us know what you think in Comments. Should GM split off its most storied nameplate?
View Poll
C7 Corvette turbo with 1,000 horsepower promised from Hennessey
Mon, 25 Feb 2013If you can't wait for the next-generation Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, Hennessey says they will have you covered. The Texas-based company has announced it will offer a spate of upgrades for the 2014 Corvette ranging from a range of bolt-on options all the way up to a 1,000-horsepower, twin-turbo system. Buyers can start with a cold air intake, cat-back exhaust or stainless steel long-tube headers, but Hennessey says it will also offer up three stages of forced induction mayhem should those bits and baubles not provide enough thrust.
Those choices start with a supercharger system good for up to 700 hp, though Hennessey will gladly ditch the blower in favor of two turbos. Doing so will spin the crank to the tune of 800 horsepower all the way up to a certifiably ludicrous 1,000 ponies. There's no word on how much these tricks will cost you - or when they will be available, as we're guessing they haven't gotten their hands on the car yet - but you can head over to the Hennessey site to drop them a line if you're curious.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.