Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1992 Chevrolet Blazer Cheyenne Sport Utility 2-door 5.7l on 2040-cars

Year:1992 Mileage:153271 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Vacaville, California, United States

Vacaville, California, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Sport Utility
Engine:5.7L 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1gnek18k5nj319348 Year: 1992
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Blazer
Trim: Cheyenne Sport Utility 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Mileage: 153,271
Exterior Color: Silver
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

The Good:

This SUV runs good. There are no known mechanical defects. The engine is solid and the 5 spd transmission shifts smoothly.
The brakes were replaced all around in January, as well as a new water pump. I am the second owner. It was originally purchased
by the state of Montana in 92'. I still have the original window sticker! I purchased it at auction from the state in 2010. I believe it
was used by Fish and Game or the like.

The Bad:

For California buyers, the truck failed smog test for high HC. When I smogged it two years ago the mechanic said the cat may need to
be replaced next time. I'm not sure why it failed nor do I want to spend the money to find out. I had to do a complete tune up last time
and it passed but I don't really drive it anymore. Registration is due on 06/10/2013.

The Ugly:

The exhaust system definately needs some attention paid. The cold Montana winters took their toll I guess. Little pin holes throughout.
Hey, maybe that's why it failed smog? Anyway, as you see from my patch work, there was a small hole in the pipe behind the cat. Fyi, it
was campbell's chicken soup and was it good! The two front tires are completly shot. Not really any tread left. The rear two are in decent
shape. Maybe 5/10 on both... The A/C may work but it would need to be charged... The aftermarket radio was stolen last Christmas.
Ya know, tis the season and all.

Thanks for looking.

 

Auto Services in California

Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 2549 Marconi Ave, Rncho-Cordova
Phone: (877) 890-9370

Z D Motorsports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 8115 Canoga Ave, Calabasas-Hills
Phone: (818) 932-9222

Young Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 890 Central Ave, Permanente
Phone: (650) 969-1151

XACT WINDOW TINTING & 3M CLEAR BRA PAINT PROTECTION ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass Coating & Tinting Materials, Window Tinting
Address: 5140 E Airport Dr Suite G, Montclair
Phone: (909) 605-0422

Woodland Hills Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 6111 Topanga Canyon Blvd, Bell-Canyon
Phone: (818) 887-7111

West Valley Machine Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Machine Shop, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 9811 Deering Ave, Val-Verde
Phone: (818) 998-5084

Auto blog

GM's MPG overstatement could affect 2 million vehicles

Tue, May 17 2016

Late last week, GM admitted that three of its large SUVs fuel economy window stickers did not match their actual efficiency ratings, and so the vehicles couldn't be sold. The stickers on the 2016 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Buick Enclave said their ratings were one to two miles per gallon better than they should have been. Officially, the number of affected vehicles sits at about 60,000. But Consumer Reports makes a good point: what's up with all of the previous model year SUVs that are basically the same vehicle? To wit: the 2016 model year vehicles are not substantially different than the 2015 or the 2014, or even going all the way back to 2007. On the EPA's fuel economy website, all of these older models will "have better stated fuel economy numbers than the new vehicles in GM's dealerships," Consumer Reports noted. CR's best point, and the one that makes the 60,000 number potentially grow to 2 million if all of the vehicles built on this platform are affected, is that "[i]t seems unlikely that the company would change the powertrain on these carryover models so late in their model cycles in a way that would cause a dramatic, negative impact on fuel economy." GM says that earlier model year SUVs are not affected and the EPA did not respond to CR's question about the potential for more discrepancies. We've seen automakers reverse course before, so if GM has to come out with a mea culpa soon, don't be surprised. GM is rushing corrected stickers to dealers so that the SUVs can be sold again, but a fix for the already-sold vehicles could be trickier to solve. Related Video: Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse

Pushing Back: GM expanding Chevrolet into Korea, Daewoo out

Thu, 29 Apr 2010

Chevrolet Camaro goes to South Korea - Click above for high-res image
General Motors decided several years ago to begin heavily promoting Chevrolet as its global mainstream brand even in markets where its existing brands like Opel and Daewoo were a dominant force. Today, at the Busan Motor Show in South Korea, GM Daewoo president Mike Arcamone announced that the Camaro would lead the way in GM's efforts to market Chevrolet in South Korea.
For now at least Chevrolet and Daewoo-branded vehicles will coexist in the Korean market. However, while we were in China last week GM officials told us that the Daewoo brand, which has been somewhat tainted by past quality issues, would eventually be phased out in favor of Chevrolet. When the new Aveo launches next year it will likely be badged as a Chevrolet even though GM Daewoo is in charge of engineering the car.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.