Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Chevrolet Tahoe Lt Sport Utility 4-door 5.3l on 2040-cars

US $4,250.00
Year:2003 Mileage:188019 Color: Green /
 Tan
Location:

Richmond Hill, Georgia, United States

Richmond Hill, Georgia, United States
Advertising:
Engine:5.3L 323Cu. In. V8 FLEX OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:FLEX
VIN: 1gnec13zx3j245052 Year: 2003
Mileage: 188,019
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Green
Model: Tahoe
Interior Color: Tan
Trim: LT Sport Utility 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Options: Leather Seats
Number of Cylinders: 8
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows, Power Seats
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Not the prettiest car on the road but in good mechanical condition.  Transmission rebuilt 30,000 miles ago, new alternator and all O2 sensors just replaced and car runs and drives as good as my new Tahoe.  Power windows, power seats, and air conditioner all work perfectly.  Car has removable 3rd row seat.  Radio works as do all speakers. CD player is multi disc changer but has disc stuck in it so does not currently work.  As you can see paint is not in very good condition and there are some dents and dings. Tires are in fair condition.  Overall I would say that the car would be classed Fair by Kelly Blue Book but reserve is set well below that value so you still get a good deal even if you disagree.

Chevrolet Tahoe for Sale

Auto Services in Georgia

Zoro Used Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 265 Hawthorne Ave, Bogart
Phone: (706) 548-2299

Xtreme Wheels & Tires ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2135 Defoor Hills Rd NW # B, Forest-Park
Phone: (404) 898-9093

Whitleys Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 381 Industrial Park Dr, Winder
Phone: (678) 442-0940

Westside Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 2325 Gillionville Rd, Sasser
Phone: (229) 434-0679

Wesley`s Car Care & Detail ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing, Car Wash
Address: 6077 New Peachtree Rd, Pine-Lake
Phone: (888) 420-1846

Valdosta Alignment Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing, Engines-Diesel-Fuel Injection Parts & Service
Address: 302 E Hill Ave, Valdosta
Phone: (229) 242-2170

Auto blog

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Are you the 2014 Corvette Grand Sport?

Thu, 21 Feb 2013

When are stripes more than just stripes? Follow up question: Is the product development team at Chevrolet really cocky enough to hide the next C7 Corvette variant in plain sight? This very recently spotted, and ostensibly obscured C7 asks a lot more questions than it answers, but there's at least some evidence to support that it might be the next Corvette Grand Sport.
The first and most obvious tip-off that something is up with this 'Vette revolves around those silver stripes. Obviously the stripes themselves don't necessarily denote a new model. However, when Chevy recently launched its "colorizer" website for the Stingray, there was no provision made for racing stripes - solid colors only.
Grand Sport exhibit number two is actually an incriminating lack of badges. The production Corvettes we've seen to date have all carried Stingray badges on their fenders, just behind the vent. The car seen in these images has no such badges, which is an intriguing omission on an car that looks like a production-spec vehicle otherwise.