1975 Chevrolet 454 Suburban 3/4 Ton 2wd And Factory Dual Air!! on 2040-cars
Mercer Island, Washington, United States
|
You are bidding on a 1975 Chevrolet 3/4 ton 2WD Suburban with just over 100,00 original miles. This Suburban was a one owner vehicle living in the same city and garage its entire life. The engine is a 454,automatic transmission with factory dual ac that still blows cold (rear does not) power steering, power brakes and a period correct tow package and electric brake. This thing is a time capsule and cooler than cool. The interior is near perfect with the exception of the headliner( sagging). The door panels, dash and instrument cluster are perfect, including the original wheels and hubcaps. This was the family's main rig and was treated with love its whole life, regular maintenance etc. I have all the original paper work and receipts (no build sheet) but have two original brochures from the local dealership just miles from my house. The original owner special ordered it with dual ac, and only a single rear bench. All the glass is perfect and little to zero rust and believe it or not the electric rear window works perfect!!, even has the original carpet thats very nice for its age.If your a Chev guy/fanatic like myself your not going to find a better one of these. I bought it just as it sits with the dust intact. Sorry for no engine bay shots as its a time capsule as well. Only the rear ac pump is missing, but totally unmolested engine. I will get pics of that engine bay on here soon. I'll kick myself for selling it and hope it goes to a fellow Chevrolet guy to tow his classic with Lol.
On Sep-11-14 at 18:47:41 PDT, seller added the following information: I've added photos and I'll answer a few questions. Yes its a Siverado, rear end 3.73. The engine compartment is only missing the smog pump otherwise everything is there. The original jack and spare tire are in the truck. The interior, besides the headliner is missing one trim ring around drivers side passenger door lever. One small dent like I mentioned R/F lower quarter and a small bend in the L/R bumper and thats it. Its solid. All the rust on the underside is surface all panels are rust free. The truck sat since 06 in a garage. Engine runs great and even better if you tossed new plugs in it. Steers tight and stops excellent. This thing could be a daily driver no problem. |
Chevrolet Suburban for Sale
2002 chevrolet suburban 1500 lt z-71 4x4 sport utility 4-door 5.3l(US $6,700.00)
1993 chevrolet suburban c/k2500 siilverado 4x4,rust free body,not smoked in.nice
Lt leather heated seats bluetooth second row buckets dual zone climate control(US $21,988.00)
Chevrolet suburban 2wd 4dr 1500 ls suv automatic vortec 5.3l v8 sfi with a grays(US $22,888.00)
1931 chevrolet carry all no reserve
1967 chevrolet suburban custom(US $65,000.00)
Auto Services in Washington
West Richland Auto Repair ★★★★★
We Fix IT Auto Repair ★★★★★
Trucks Plus Inc ★★★★★
Tru Autobody & Collision Repair LLC ★★★★★
Toyota of Renton ★★★★★
Toby`s Battery & Auto Electric ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM faces possible class action lawsuit over 8-speed transmission
Thu, Apr 25 2019General Motors has been hit with a class-action lawsuit from owners who allege the eight-speed automatic transmission found in several rear-wheel-drive Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC models between the 2015 and 2019 model years has a defect that causes the vehicles to hesitate and jerk when accelerating or slowing down. The lawsuit was posted to ClassAction.org and spotted by GM Authority. Problems with GM's Hydra-Matic 8L90 and 8L45 transmissions have been well-documented on Internet forums and via complaints filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, with many reporting damage to their vehicles. The lawsuit was first filed in December in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida but appears to have been transferred recently to New York. Autoblog sought comment from Theodore Leopold, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. "These transmissions have a common defect," the complaint reads. "Drivers attempting to accelerate or decelerate their cars feel a hesitation, followed by a significant shake, shudder, jerk, clunk, or 'hard shift' when the vehicle's automatic transmission changes gears." The problem also occurs when the vehicles accelerate in a single gear, without shifting, the plaintiffs allege. "Drivers have reported that the shift is sometimes so violent, they feel as though they have been hit by another vehicle." The problem is believed to center on the transmission, torque converter or both. The complaint says it causes undue friction, causing hydraulic systems and gears to function improperly and sometimes leaves metal shavings throughout the transmission, leading to costly repairs and replacement of parts or the entire transmission. It says GM has known about the problems since shortly after it introduced the transmissions, and has issued 13 technical service bulletins, none of which have resolved the problem. GM declined to comment on the lawsuit. The plaintiffs say GM should have warned consumers about the issues and covered repairs under each vehicle's three-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty. They're seeking statewide classes in at least six states: California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Oklahoma and Texas.
GM under fire from safety advocates over braking problem caused by recall fix
Thu, Feb 6 2020Safety experts are lambasting General Motors over what they say is the automaker’s slow notification of owners of certain 2019 sedans and trucks that a recall fix could cause power braking to fail and increase the risk of a crash, the Detroit Free Press reports. GMÂ’s original recall in December targeted about 550,000 Cadillac CT6 sedans and Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 pickups, all from the 2019 model year, over potentially defective electronic stability control and antilock brakes. In that case, GM said the errors would not show up as a diagnostic warning on the instrument cluster. But after GM had done recall work on 162,000 vehicles, about 1,700 owner have complained that their power brakes didnÂ’t work after they had the recall done and then used the OnStar app to start their vehicle. GM then issued a supplemental fix for customers whoÂ’d already had their vehicles serviced. In this case, a diagnostic warning should illuminate saying either “Service Brake Assist” or “Service ECS,” which GM says is a signal that a customer should not drive the vehicle and instead call their dealer, which will tow the vehicle and have it repaired. Safety advocates say the automaker hasnÂ’t gone far enough to protect customers. “The fact that you could potentially start a vehicle and not have brakes is a pretty risky proposition,” Sean Kane, president of the Safety Research and Strategies, which works on auto issues for plaintiffs and governmental organizations, told the Freep. “The fact that they wouldnÂ’t notify owners (sooner) is pretty stunning.” GM told the Freep it was required to notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and file paperwork before it notified customers about the original recall, which was made Dec. 12. It then had to investigate and resolve the problem created by its original recall fix before alerting customers. GMÂ’s call center and dealers are contacting the remaining 900 customers who havenÂ’t yet had the update made to the original recall repair. GM also hired a vendor to send recall letters to the 550,000 customers affected by the original recall notifying them about the update. There are no known injuries or deaths related to the problem. Read the Freep story here.
Coronavirus shakes up America's truck market: GM outselling Ford and Ram
Thu, Apr 2 2020FCA, Ford and General Motors joined the rest of the U.S. auto industry in taking heavy volume hits due to coronavirus-related shortages of both cars and customers. The saying goes that a rising tide lifts all boats; it stands to reason, then, that a falling one would have the opposite effect. However, as we learned Thursday, the automotive market can behave in unpredictable ways. While the F-Series remained the best-selling nameplate in Q1, GM's full-size trucks are now outselling Ford's again for the first time in years, and with this upward thrust from the General, FCA's Ram was unceremoniously booted out of a hard-earned second place. While late-March sales declines hit just about every major automaker in one way or another, the model-by-model results weren't nearly so uniform. And because the market tends to be a zero-sum game, for every winner, there generally has to be a loser. In this case, that winner was GM, and its rise had to come at the expense of another automaker, in this case, Ford. F-Series sales dropped 13.1 percent in the first quarter of 2020, while sales of GM's full-sized Silverado and Sierra surged nearly 28% in the same period. FCA's Ram lineup managed a steady-as-she-goes 7% increase. All-in, GM finished the quarter with 197,743 full-size trucks sold to Ford's 186,562. Here's the full breakdown: Ford F-Series: 186,562 Chevrolet Silverado*: 144,734 Ram P/U: 128,805 GMC Sierra: 53,009 *includes 1,036 Medium Duty sales Things are a but murkier in the midsize segment, where the Chevy Colorado slipped 36% to just 21,430 units sold — just a few hundred better than the slow-selling Ford Ranger's Q1 numbers. The GMC Canyon experienced an almost identical slide, finishing the quarter with just 4,483 units sold. For perspective, Jeep sold more than 15,000 Gladiators and Toyota's midsize Tacoma slipped less than 8%, finishing the quarter with nearly 54,000 sales. We suspect this discrepancy in full- and mid-size truck sales comes from shifting incentives. Ford, GM and FCA would like to keep selling bigger trucks because there's far more profit margin built into their list prices. Even with tens of thousands of dollars in manufacturer money on the hood, big trucks still make money. Since these automakers report quarterly, we won't get another good look at these numbers until July, but if you thought that 2019 represented the new normal for U.S. auto sales, well, think again.






















