2015 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Work Truck on 2040-cars
13895 N S R 67, Mooresville, Indiana, United States
Engine:6.0L V8 16V MPFI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GC1KUEG6FF127028
Stock Num: 5005
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500 Work Truck
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Silver Ice Metallic
Interior Color: Jet Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 2
Silver Ice Metallic exterior and Jet Black/Dark Ash interior, Work Truck trim. 4x4, iPod/MP3 Input, Bluetooth, ENGINE, VORTEC 6.0L VARIABLE VALVE TI... TRAILER BRAKE CONTROLLER, INTEGRATED, DIFFERENTIAL, HEAVY-DUTY LOCKING REAR... CLICK NOW!======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: 4x4, iPod/MP3 Input, Bluetooth MP3 Player, Electronic Stability Control, 4-Wheel ABS, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, Tire Pressure Monitoring System. ======OPTION PACKAGES: WT CONVENIENCE PACKAGE (Includes (AKO) tinted windows, (KI4) 110V outlet, (AQQ) Remote Keyless Entry and (DL8) outside, heated power-adjustable mirrors. DIFFERENTIAL, HEAVY-DUTY LOCKING REAR, TRAILERING EQUIPMENT Trailering hitch platform 2.5 with a 2.0 insert for HD, 7-wire harness with independent fused trailering circuits mated to a 7-way sealed connector to hook up parking lamps, backup lamps, right and left turn signals, an electric brake lead, battery and a ground, The trailer connector also includes the 4-way for use on trailers without brakes - park, brake/turn lamps, TRAILER BRAKE CONTROLLER, INTEGRATED, ENGINE, VORTEC 6.0L VARIABLE VALVE TIMING V8 SFI E85-COMPATIBLE, FLEXFUEL capable of running on unleaded or up to 85% ethanol (360 hp [268.4 kW] @ 5400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [515.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (E63) fleetside pickup box; (322 hp [240.1 kW] @ 4400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [515.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (ZW9) pickup box delete (STD). Work Truck with Silver Ice Metallic exterior and Jet Black/Dark Ash interior features a 8 Cylinder Engine with 360 HP at 5400 RPM*. NEW. ======WHY BUY FROM US: While we make every effort to be sure that we are offering you the lowest price the first time, we are not perfect. If you find a lower advertised price somewhere else, simply print it out and bring it in, we will gladly match it for you. Horsepower calculations based on trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase.
Chevrolet Silverado 2500 for Sale
2015 chevrolet silverado 2500 lt(US $47,715.00)
2015 chevrolet silverado 2500 ltz(US $52,840.00)
2015 chevrolet silverado 2500 ltz(US $62,450.00)
2015 chevrolet silverado 2500 lt(US $46,040.00)
2015 chevrolet silverado 2500 work truck(US $39,145.00)
2013 chevrolet silverado 2500 lt(US $44,320.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Webb Hyundai ★★★★★
Trusty & Sons Tire Co ★★★★★
Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM cutting Chevy Sonic, Buick Verano production by more than 20%
Sat, Jun 13 2015General Motors' Orion Assembly plant in Michigan is seeing even more production cuts this year to further reduce inventories of the Chevrolet Sonic and Buick Verano. These latest adjustments mean layoffs for about 100 workers in phases starting in July. "GM Orion Assembly will adjust plant production capacity to better align with market demand," the company said in a statement announcing the change. Through May, sales of the Sonic are down 28.5 percent to 29,082 vehicles, and the Verano is off 15.6 percent, with 15,279 sold this year. According to unnamed plant insiders speaking to Automotive News, the assembly rate is slowing at Orion Assembly from the current 33 cars an hour down to 26 an hour, a 21-percent reduction. GM is also reportedly going to keep the plant idle for three weeks during the normal summer shutdown, rather than the usual two. Earlier in the year, the factory was idled for two weeks due to excess supply of the Sonic and Verano. In March, it was closed again for several days for the same reason. The Orion Assembly plant is the future home to the line for the Chevy Bolt EV. GM Statement: GM Orion Assembly will adjust plant production capacity to better align with market demand. A phased layoff of approximately 100 employees will begin in July 2015 and conclude by year-end. Related Video: News Source: Automotive News - sub. req.Image Credit: Bill Pugliano / Getty Images Plants/Manufacturing Buick Chevrolet GM Hatchback Sedan buick verano orion assembly
GM laying off more than 4,000 workers Monday morning
Sat, Feb 2 2019According to reports from Automotive News, The Detroit News, and CNN, General Motors plans to begin laying off more than 4,000 salaried workers starting Monday morning. In a statement to AN, a spokesperson for the automaker said, "We are not confirming timing. Our employees are our priority. We will communicate with them first." We've been expecting layoffs at General Motors since November, 2018. At the time, the Detroit-based automaker announced it would seek to shed 8,100 salaried employees, shut down five assembly plants in North America, and kill off several slow-selling models. One month earlier, GM offered buyout packages to 18,000 workers and said it would seek to cut its global workforce by 25 percent. A spokesperson said at the time the moves were "proactive steps to get ahead of the curve by accelerating our efforts to address overall business performance." The cost-cutting moves are expected to save GM up to $2.5 billion in 2019 and as much as $6 billion by 2020. David Kudla, CEO and chief investment strategist of Mainstay Capital Management, referred to the impending culling as "Black Monday" and told The Detroit News that the layoffs would begin around 7:30 a.m. and continue in waves throughout the coming days and weeks. GM plans to deliver on its fourth-quarter and full-year 2018 earnings report on Wednesday. President Donald Trump plans to deliver the annual State of the Union address a day earlier on Tuesday. We expect to hear plenty more from both sides over the next several days.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.