2015 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Lt on 2040-cars
Blum, Texas, United States
IF YOU ARE INTERESTED EMAIL ME AT: lakialggrabel@clubkawasaki.com .
This IS my bottom dollar. I owe $44,151.86. I have arranged to take out a personal loan to make up the difference
between my selling price of $39,000 and what I owe. There is really no need to send me a message asking what is my
bottom dollar.
Duramax 6.6 liter turbocharged diesel, Allison heavy-duty 6 speed automatic transmission, double cab, 6'6" bed with
lighting, Line-X bed protection and behind-the-cab tool box; B & W Turnoverball gooseneck and receiver trailer
hitches, 7-pole trailer wiring connectors in the bed and on the bumper, 4 point connector on the bumper, factory
installed electric trailer brake controller, slide-out side mirrors with turn signals, Z-71 Off-Road suspension,
rear-view camera, LT Trim Package with touch-screen audio system, dual zone temperature control, fog/driving lights
in front bumper, 18" alloy wheels, 110V power outlet under dash, 6-way power front driver's seat and remote engine
start.
This was my dream truck, and it's in perfect condition. I bought it to tow a large sailboat on a gooseneck trailer,
but I never did. I've driven it 10 miles to & from work, carried a few sheets of plywood for home projects and took
two 4,000 mile vacations. But, it's never been a work truck. I'm over 60 years old and have never allowed anyone to
smoke in this truck. I had the dealer do the first two oil changes; since then, I have changed the oil and filter
every 3,000 miles. I changed the transmission fluid filter at 18,000 miles. On the highway, it's surprisingly
smooth, considering the heavy suspension and gets around 20 miles/gallon (on the highway).
I'm selling it so I might retire a couple of years earlier. I won't sell to anyone who doesn't come to me and
shake my hand.
Chevrolet Silverado 2500 for Sale
- 2008 chevrolet silverado 2500 ltz(US $12,100.00)
- 2017 chevrolet silverado 2500 ltz plus(US $19,000.00)
- 2006 chevrolet silverado 2500(US $11,500.00)
- 2013 chevrolet silverado 2500 lt(US $12,100.00)
- 2006 chevrolet silverado 2500 lt(US $18,000.00)
- 2007 chevrolet silverado 2500 ltz crew cab pickup 4-door(US $11,500.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Zoil Lube ★★★★★
Young Chevrolet ★★★★★
Yhs Automotive Service Center ★★★★★
Woodlake Motors ★★★★★
Winwood Motor Co ★★★★★
Wayne`s Car Care Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Chevy Volt to make auto show debut this season
Wed, Jul 30 2014Ever since we saw that spy shots of the 2016 Chevy Volt, we've been hungering for more information on the next-gen version of GM's green halo car. It appears we might not have long to wait, at least for an official tease. An inside source that wishes to remain anonymous told AutoblogGreen that GM will make two announcements regarding the second-gen Volt at the CAR Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City, MI next week. The first, and most intriguing, is that that we will get our first glimpse of the new Volt at some point during the upcoming auto show season. That means either Los Angeles later this year or else Detroit, Chicago or New York in early 2015. The second bit of news is that GM will be moving production of the electric motors from Mexico to Michigan. Details and official confirmation are, of course, missing and Chevrolet declined comment to AutoblogGreen. We should know more next week.
Motor Trend puts Chevy Camaro Z28 and Porsche 911 GT3 Head 2 Head
Mon, Dec 29 2014Motor Trend admits, "This is an unfair comparison." But that doesn't make it any less fun to watch when they pit a Camaro Z/28 against the Porsche 911 GT3. The former has a 7.0-liter V8 with 505 horsepower and 481 pound-feet of torque shifted through a six-speed manual. The latter has a 3.8-liter flat-six with 475 hp and 324 lb-ft shifted through a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. Yet those are only the little disparities – the big disparities are mass and money: the Camaro weighs 3,882 pounds and costs $76,150 as-tested, the Porsche weighs 3,267 pounds and costs $145,785. But they're both about hardcore performance, so MT takes them out on the street, to the drag strip, to the parking lot for figure eights and a skidpad test, and finally to Big Willow for Randy Pobst to give his professional assessment. Remember when a lotta people spent a lotta time debating Pirates vs. Ninjas? This is like that, only it's the "haul-ass good-time car" vs. the "track surgeon." Enjoy the debate in the video.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.