Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Chevrolet Silverado 2500hd Lt1 4x4 Diesel on 2040-cars

Year:2006 Mileage:56547 Color: Black /
 Gray
Location:

Roscoe, Illinois, United States

Roscoe, Illinois, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:ENGINE, DURAMAX 6600 TURBO DIESEL V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1GCHK23266F113348
Year: 2006
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Mileage: 56,547
Sub Model: LT1
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 4
Interior Color: Gray
Drivetrain: 4 Wheel Drive
Number of Cylinders: 8

Auto Services in Illinois

Wolf and Cermak Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2160 S Wolf Rd, Western-Springs
Phone: (708) 202-6600

Wheels Of Chicagoland ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1864 Techny Ct, Northfield
Phone: (847) 205-0420

Urban Tanks Custom Vehicle Out ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Customizing
Address: 436 E Lincoln Hwy, Dekalb
Phone: (815) 754-9000

Towing Solutions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: Industry
Phone: (217) 222-5960

Top Coverage Ltd ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Windshield Repair
Address: 963 E Chicago St, Inverness
Phone: (847) 697-2090

Supreme Automotive & Trans ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 1341 S Spencer St, Aurora
Phone: (630) 231-4444

Auto blog

GM applies for LT5, LTX trademarks... are new small block variants coming?

Mon, 29 Apr 2013

Recently discovered General Motors trademark applications for LT4, LT5, LT88 and LTX have observers wondering what kind of high-performance offerings could be on their way. A new LT4 would mark a return of the engine designation first used on the Corvette Grand Sport, SLP Pontiac Firehawk and SLP Chevrolet Camaro SS from 1996 and 1997. Supposition at Corvette Forum - which provided advance intel on the C7 like these leaked images - believes a new LT4 could go into the high-performance trim of the next-gen, 2015 Camaro that would be more powerful than the 580-horsepower Camaro ZL1.
Seeing an LT5 again would also be déjà vu - in its former life it was a 5.7-liter V8 for the C4 Corvette ZR-1 from 1990-1994 designed by Lotus, producing from 370 hp to 405 hp. A mix of rumor and hope is that the new LT5 will be a supercharged evolution of the 6.2-liter LT1 (pictured) placed in the new C7 Corvette, and that it will go into the C7 version of the ZR1 pumping out something like 700 hp.
The LTX trademark is, as with that last letter, a complete mystery. If the "X" isn't a generic way to denote the whole LT family, it's wondered if it LTX could refer to a crate motor offering like the LSX.

Next-gen Chevy Cruze caught cruising in the cold

Wed, 13 Feb 2013

Spy photographers have caught what looks like the next-generation Chevrolet Cruze out on snow patrol. The camo could be tricking our eyes, but it look like it has an even tidier, more rounded front end and even lower fenders in relation to the top of the hood. And either a chunk of camo has been wedged between the side mirrors and the doors, or the mirrors are up for revision, too.
The door handles have been moved up the side of the car, leading the way to a rear end that grows a bit in length. If the rumors are true, the coming second-generation Cruze sits on the new D2XX platform that will replace the Delta and Theta platforms at General Motors. A global architecture, the Cruze will be the first to get it, but it will underpin everything from next Chevrolet Volt to the Equinox and could be responsible for 2.5 million units by 2018. The next Cruze is expected to begin production in GM's Lordstown, Ohio plant in the third quarter of 2014.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.