2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Hd Ls Crew Cab 6.6l Diesel, Immaculate, Must See! on 2040-cars
Pipersville, Pennsylvania, United States
Engine:6.6L 400Cu. In. V8 DIESEL OHV Turbocharged
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Sub Model: LS
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Green
Model: Silverado 2500 HD
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: LS Crew Cab Pickup 4-Door
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Number of Cylinders: 8
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 139,233
ONE OF THE NICEST TRUCKS YOU WILL FIND
ONE OWNER, CARFAX CERTIFIED, 2003 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500HD CREW CAB 4WD WITH 6.6 LITER DURAMAX DIESEL ENGINE! THIS ONE OWNER VEHICLE, OWNED AND PAMPERED BY A 72 YEAR OLD MAN IS THE TRUCK YOU WANT!! NON-SMOKER VEHICLE!! EQUIPPED WITH POWER WINDOWS, POWER LOCKS, POWER FOLD IN MIRRORS WITH BUILT IN TURN SIGNALS, POWER SEAT, AM/FM CD, KEYLESS ENTRY, CHROME STEO BARS, CHROME BED RAILS, BEDLINER, LOCKING TONN. COVER, BED DEFLECTOR, VENT VISORS, DUAL ZONE CLIMATE CONTROL, WHEEL FLARES, TOWING PACKAGE, LOCKING DIFFERENTIAL, BUCKET SEATS AND MORE. BRAND NEW INSPECTION!! THE BODY IS IN EXCELLENT SHAPE, THE INTERIOR IS PERFECT AND THE CARPETS ARE IN GREAT SHAPE. THE ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION RUN LIKE THE DAY THE TRUCK WAS BUILT!! NEVER IN AN ACCIDENT, THIS TRUCK HAS PLENTY OF LIFE REMAINING!! WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO END THIS LISTING AT ANYTIME AND SELL THE TRUCK TO A WALK IN CUSTOMER. IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS VEHICLE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO GIVE ME A CALL AT 267-246-5797. THANK YOU, ANDREW
Chevrolet Silverado 2500 for Sale
- 2007 chevrolet silverado 2500hd lt power tommy lift gat(US $8,950.00)
- 2006 chevy 2500hd diesel 4x4 lt2 long bed crew cab bose(US $19,985.00)
- 2003 chevrolet silverado 2500 hd ls must see 4x4 4wd must see(US $9,995.00)
- 2008 lt crew 2wd turbo diesel lifetime warranty we finance 86k miles
- 2008 chevy silverado 2500 ltz extended cab z71(US $32,500.00)
- 2008 chevy silverado 2500 ltz 4x4 diesel remington nav texas direct auto(US $44,980.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★
Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★
United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★
Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★
Team One Auto Group ★★★★★
Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.
Best car infotainment systems: From UConnect to MBUX, these are our favorites
Sun, Jan 7 2024Declaring one infotainment system the best over any other is an inherently subjective matter. You can look at quantitative testing for things like input response time and various screen load times, but ask a room full of people that have tried all car infotainment systems what their favorite is, and you’re likely to get a lot of different responses. For the most part, the various infotainment systems available all share a similar purpose. They aim to help the driver get where they're going with navigation, play their favorite tunes via all sorts of media playback options and allow folks to stay connected with others via phone connectivity. Of course, most go way beyond the basics these days and offer features like streaming services, in-car performance data and much more. Unique features are aplenty when you start diving through menus, but how they go about their most important tasks vary widely. Some of our editors prefer systems that are exclusively touch-based and chock full of boundary-pushing features. Others may prefer a back-to-basics non-touch system that is navigable via a scroll wheel. You can compare it to the phone operating system wars. Just like some prefer Android phones over iPhones, we all have our own opinions for what makes up the best infotainment interface. All that said, our combined experience tells us that a number of infotainment systems are at least better than the rest. WeÂ’ve narrowed it down to five total systems in their own subcategories that stand out to us. Read on below to see our picks, and feel free to make your own arguments in the comments. Best infotainment overall: UConnect 5, various Stellantis products Ram 1500 Uconnect Infotainment System Review If thereÂ’s one infotainment system that all of us agree is excellent, itÂ’s UConnect. It has numerous qualities that make it great, but above all else, UConnect is simple and straightforward to use. Ease of operation is one of the most (if not the single most) vital parts of any infotainment system interface. If youÂ’re expected to be able to tap away on a touchscreen while driving and still pay attention to the road, a complex infotainment system is going to remove your attention from the number one task at hand: driving. UConnect uses a simple interface that puts all of your key functions in a clearly-represented row on the bottom of the screen. Tap any of them, and it instantly pulls up that menu.
Chevy Spark EV could be coming to Midwest later this year
Tue, Jun 10 2014Ohio is not known as a hotbed of EV sales – if anything, the state is a bit anti-EV, thanks to a legislative fight against Tesla's direct sales model – but it might be on Chevrolet's short list to expand the market for the Spark EV in the near future. The latest official GM press release on the battery-powered Spark still says the car is "available exclusively in California and Oregon," but Hybrid Cars found four Ohio dealerships that list a Spark EV on their websites, with hints the the car will be coming to the Midwest state by the end of the summer. See, for example, here, here, here and here. But that's probably not going to happen, according to Randy Fox, GM communication's manager for passenger cars. Fox told AutoblogGreen that, "At this point in time, we don't have any official plans to expand the Spark EV beyond California and Oregon." The reason is that California and Oregon have the infrastructure to support EVs, Fox said, and GM wants to be able to support its EV customers. "We are continuing to look at other options," he said. "The selling point for electric cars today is not advertising, it's eyeballs, it's peer exposure" – John O'Dell John O'Dell, a senior editor at Edmunds.com, told AutoblogGreen that, "It makes sense for [GM] to expand sales and it makes sense to do it in a quiet manner, to get these vehicles on the road. The selling point for electric cars today is not advertising, it's eyeballs, it's peer exposure. If someone in my neighborhood has one and he likes it, then maybe I can trust him. So it's important to get these vehicles on the road." Chevy sold 182 Spark EVs last month, a significant increase over the 98 sold in April. That's still small potatoes compared to the 3,000+ Nissan Leaf EVs sold last month, but making the electric Spark available in Ohio, say, or GM's home state of Michigan could boost those numbers. AutoblogGreen called a few dealerships in Michigan to see what they had heard. One salesman said he didn't think GM had started production yet but the inventory manager for another dealership said the Spark EV is scheduled to arrive in the Midwest in "roughly the fourth quarter." What would GM's incentive be to offer the car in markets outside of California where it can gain ZEV credits with each sale?