2002 Silverad0 1500 4.8l 2wd Lwb Chevrolet Chevy Truck on 2040-cars
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:4.8L 294Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Salvage
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500
Trim: Base Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 219,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Here's the story. I bought it about two and a half years ago. It was a parts delivery truck so it was well maintained with regular oil changes, etc. The truck has 219,000 miles on it. It was rear ended just before i bought it and because it was over 200,000 miles they "totaled" it. You can see from the photos that it still looks pretty darn good just a little crinkled up in the rear... the bumper took the brunt of the force. It does technically have a salvage license thanks to insurance totaling it out, but it hasn't been rebuilt or had any major surgery. It doesn't have a rear bumper on it because the impact twisted the tip of the frame where the bumper mounts. it could be straightened and a bumper (which is included) can be put on, i just never got around to it. one last thing that is a quirk with it's age is the fuel gauge. It works, but it's not accurate. If you fill it full until the gas pump stops, it'll only show 3/4 of a tank.... so when it gets low enough for the fuel light to come on, you actually have between half and 1/4 tank... i just always fill it up when the light comes on and its not an issue.... now, all that said. Kelley Blue Book puts the truck at $4800 or more in this condition except that is for a "clear title" so I'm only asking $2,500 for it. It's a lot of truck for the money. It has a Rhino Linings spray-in bed liner (non slip) and the tires are in really good shape with a lot of tread left. Nice spare too. No leaks, cold A/C. I had the transmission serviced when I got it (new fluid and filter) I've kept the oil changed regularly and it's good to go.
4.8L V8
Auto
A/C
Power Locks
Manual Windows
Cruise Control
Carpet
Cloth Seats
A/M-F/M Stereo
Rhino Linings Spray in Bedliner
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
2007 chevrolet silverado 1500 lt z71 4-door 5.3l..20 inch wheels...no reserve
2008 chevy silverado 1500 2wd ls *we finance and trade!
2003 chevrolet silverado 1500 ls extended cab pickup 4-door 5.3l(US $3,800.00)
2013 chevrolet silverado 1500 ltz white diamond edition crew cab pickup(US $42,500.00)
1983 chevrolet silverado short bed truck(US $3,889.00)
Chev 2010 silverado hotshot delivery concepts catering truck with cab(US $39,999.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Toyota of Fayetteville ★★★★★
Satterfield Motor Co. ★★★★★
Safelite AutoGlass - Bentonville ★★★★★
S & F Auto Sales ★★★★★
River Country Chevrolet ★★★★★
Red River Dodge Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Auto blog
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.
NHTSA upgrades probe into 1.7 million GM vehicles over wiper failures
Tue, Dec 17 2019WASHINGTON — The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said Tuesday it is upgrading an investigation into 1.7 million General Motors vehicles for windshield wiper failures. The auto safety agency opened the probe in November 2018 to see if GM needed to expand a 2016 recall of 2013 model year Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain SUVs to cover additional vehicles. The engineering analysis probe covers 2010-2012 and 2014-2016 Equinox and Terrain vehicles. NHTSA could demand a recall after it completes the probe. NHTSA said it has reviewed 1,900 complaints and reports related to the issue in the 1.7 million vehicles. NHTSA said it has seen elevated failure rates in the 1.7 million vehicles, even though GM said the recalled vehicles have "double the warranty rate and five times the complaint rate." GM said it will "fully cooperate to support their investigation. We do not believe these windshield washer systems are defective." The wiper failures that prompted the 2016 recall were attributed to water and debris intrusion into the windshield wiper assembly ball joints, leading to excessive wear and eventual detachment of the ball joint. GM said it was installing an improved windshield wiper motor and transmission assembly and relocating a drain hole at the base of the windshield. Related Video:
GM under fire from safety advocates over braking problem caused by recall fix
Thu, Feb 6 2020Safety experts are lambasting General Motors over what they say is the automaker’s slow notification of owners of certain 2019 sedans and trucks that a recall fix could cause power braking to fail and increase the risk of a crash, the Detroit Free Press reports. GMÂ’s original recall in December targeted about 550,000 Cadillac CT6 sedans and Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 pickups, all from the 2019 model year, over potentially defective electronic stability control and antilock brakes. In that case, GM said the errors would not show up as a diagnostic warning on the instrument cluster. But after GM had done recall work on 162,000 vehicles, about 1,700 owner have complained that their power brakes didnÂ’t work after they had the recall done and then used the OnStar app to start their vehicle. GM then issued a supplemental fix for customers whoÂ’d already had their vehicles serviced. In this case, a diagnostic warning should illuminate saying either “Service Brake Assist” or “Service ECS,” which GM says is a signal that a customer should not drive the vehicle and instead call their dealer, which will tow the vehicle and have it repaired. Safety advocates say the automaker hasnÂ’t gone far enough to protect customers. “The fact that you could potentially start a vehicle and not have brakes is a pretty risky proposition,” Sean Kane, president of the Safety Research and Strategies, which works on auto issues for plaintiffs and governmental organizations, told the Freep. “The fact that they wouldnÂ’t notify owners (sooner) is pretty stunning.” GM told the Freep it was required to notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and file paperwork before it notified customers about the original recall, which was made Dec. 12. It then had to investigate and resolve the problem created by its original recall fix before alerting customers. GMÂ’s call center and dealers are contacting the remaining 900 customers who havenÂ’t yet had the update made to the original recall repair. GM also hired a vendor to send recall letters to the 550,000 customers affected by the original recall notifying them about the update. There are no known injuries or deaths related to the problem. Read the Freep story here.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.06 s, 7914 u