Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Chevrolet Malibu Ltz on 2040-cars

US $15,995.00
Year:2010 Mileage:61100 Color: White Diamond Tricoat /
 Ebony Leather
Location:

56 E Broadway St, Shelbyville, Indiana, United States

56 E Broadway St, Shelbyville, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.6 L V6
Transmission:6 speed automatic
Condition: Certified Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1G1ZE5E70AF201433
Stock Num: U1852
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Malibu LTZ
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: White Diamond Tricoat
Interior Color: Ebony Leather
Options:
  • ABS brakes
  • Air conditioning
  • AM/FM radio XM
  • Drive type front-wheel
  • Fully automatic headlights
  • Power steering
  • Power windows
  • Tilt steering wheel
  • Transmission 6 speed automatic
  • Wheel size 18"
  • Wheelbase 2,852mm (112.3")
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 61100

Local trade in, well maintained, sunroof, non smoker, heated leather, remote start, premium paint, GM Certified. Call or email for your free copy of AutoCheck Report on any Pre-owned vehicle. SANDMAN BROTHERS INC., SINCE 1918, CERTIFIED CADILLAC, CHRYSLER AND GM PRE-OWNED. SPECIALIZING IN LOW MILEAGE, WELL MAINTAINED, LOCAL TRADE INS AND 1 OWNER CLEAN AUTOCHECK REPORTS!! FINANCING AVAILABLE, CERTIFIED SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND BODYSHOP. CALL TODD RAY, TODAY, 1 877-204-5041!!

Auto Services in Indiana

World Wide Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 2661 W Schmaltz Blvd, Unionville
Phone: (812) 339-9261

World Hyundai of Matteson ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5337 Miller Circle Dr, Dyer
Phone: (708) 983-6500

William`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Bowling-Green
Phone: (812) 533-2866

Twin City Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 600 Farabee Dr, Montmorenci
Phone: (765) 447-2999

Trevino`s Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 500 W 150th St, East-Chicago
Phone: (219) 397-1138

Tom Cherry Muffler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 1203 N College Ave, Gosport
Phone: (812) 323-1456

Auto blog

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

These are the five most ridiculous attacks on the Chevy Volt [w/videos]

Thu, Aug 7 2014

It's been a long, strange trip for the Chevy Volt from the time when the now-odd-looking concept version (above) was introduced at the 2007 Detroit Auto Show to today. And now, General Motors announced that the second-generation Chevy Volt will make an appearance at the 2015 Detroit show in January. This debut represents a victory for GM with what has easily become the most politicized car of the 21st Century. There are plenty of reasons for someone to criticize the Volt, but what's amazing is just how much anti-Volt energy has been spent not on things like the styling or how the EREV setup is not as efficient as a pure-EV powertrain. As we wait for more official information on the new Volt, we thought it would be fun to go back and look at some of the most wildly incorrect reporting and strangest attacks on the Volt from the archives. There is so much good stuff out there, it was hard to pare the list down, but these are our five favorites. Amazingly, they're not all clips from Fox News. Check 'em out below. 5. GM Is Going To Stop Making The Chevy Volt In The US Do you remember when GM was about to move Volt production to China? Well, yeah, this was reported back in early 2012 when a GM executive mentioned that the automaker would get benefits of building the Volt in the places where it sells them. This was spun into a story of GM taking Obama bailout money and then running to China. The Blaze was not happy: "Given the fact that Federal government helped itself to millions and millions of taxpayer dollars under the pretense that it was going to combat high unemployment by creating 'green jobs,' it would seem that moving research and development (and possibly manufacturing) overseas is slightly, well, counterproductive." Well, of course, that never happened. There's no way to say that GM will never build a version of the Volt in China, but the news we hear rumors of these days is that GM is going to move production of more Volt parts (specifically, the motors) to Michigan from overseas. 4. The Chevy Volt Is A Fire Trap There has never been a Volt that just spontaneously lit up while driving down the road. Yes, there were Volts that caught on fire. Yes, that's a scary thing. But there has never been a Volt that just spontaneously lit up while driving down the road. These were crashed test vehicles with destroyed batteries and plugged-in vehicles that were not the cause.