Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:454
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Manual
Model: Malibu
Trim: base
Drive Type: manual
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Mileage: 0
1965 chevy Malibu 454 m21 4 speed aluminum housing limited slip rear 69 chevelle ss rims new rear air shocks new front shocks and heavy coils good rubber all the way around engine runs well and trans works well will need new shifter rods new front brakes lines and wheel cylinders power steering power brakes. not a true big block 4 speed car. was a 283 automatic car now manual with console manual 454 have eighty percent of chrome and emblems have 2 extra doors and a hood that go with the car and an extra rear bumper. car needs passenger rear quarter panel and full trunk pan and interior work passenger side rear floor pan has a small rust spot 6 inches long quarter inch wide where shifter comes threw floor will need work someone cut hole to big .Car runs and drives but it is still a PROJECT does not heat up hold good oil pressure elderbrock carb and intake and alum. fab valve covers headers and real mild rv cam car has plenty of get up and go.FOR SALE LOCALLY I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO PULL CAR AT ANYTIME. I do not accept paypal cash upon pick up I am trying to be as honest as possible on this car you are not getting a show car you are getting a project that needs finished.and needs work to be finished it is a daily driver .
Chevrolet Malibu for Sale
- 01 chevy malibu**only 74xxx miles!**clean car-fax**passed mo inspections!(US $5,900.00)
- 1971 chevy malibu/chevelle
- 2002 chevrolet malibu ls sedan 4-door 3.1l(US $2,900.00)
- Ls 2.4l salvage repairable damaged runs and drives(US $7,750.00)
- Cd cruise control steel wheels dual air bags power windows & doors
- 2000 chevrolet malibu ls
Auto Services in Kansas
Tracy`s Automotive # 3 ★★★★★
Tracy`s Automotive ★★★★★
Tracy`s Automotive ★★★★★
SMS AutoSports ★★★★★
Scott`s Mobile Mechanic ★★★★★
Ryan`s Motor Sports ★★★★★
Auto blog
PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]
Wed, 19 Jun 2013PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.
1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28
Mon, Jan 12 2015Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review