Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Star Trek Muraled Gmc G15 Vandura Van. Survivor, Custom Van, Amazing Paint. on 2040-cars

US $12,000.00
Year:1978 Mileage:24000 Color:
Location:

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Advertising:

AMAZING SURVIVOR CUSTOM  STAR TREK VAN

 

 

1978 GMC G15 Vandura Van.

 

I have reluctantly (we would like to shrink the family vehicle stable a bit as we now have two small boys and no time) decided to sell my 1978 GMC Vandura custom van.

The van was built up from stock in 1979-1980, paint was done by G.S. Roy, a well known Canadian artist.  I contacted Mr. Roy, who remembers painting this van as well as another for the owners cousin (that one was ‘mermaid’ themed…wish I knew where it was!).  The van is a survivor and sat for years in storage owned by the same family from new to 2012 (33 years)…I purchased it last summer from Ontario and shipped it out to the west coast here in Vancouver where I have enjoyed every day of owning it.  NOT a vehicle for the shy, you absolutely cannot go anywhere without many thumbs up, cheers, and people waxing nostalgic about custom vans and/or Star Trek.  The van currently has a little over 24,000 KM’s (15k miles) on it showing on the odometer.  I can’t verify for sure this isn’t 124,000km’s but looking over all aspects of the van I would not doubt if it is true…it isn’t perfect, but is a true survivor of an era gone by and I wouldn’t hesitate to drive it anywhere.  I’ve replaced the tires with period correct BFG T/A’s , installed a new heater core, brake master cylinder, tuned her up, installed a back up camera, and done all required to pass a BC (ridiculously strict and silly) provincial inspection.  I’ve spent $3500 on the Van in the past year to make it mechanically excellent and drivable every day if someone wanted to.

I’ll outline the good and bad below in each category to the best of my ability, and will take as many pics as I can to show the condition of items.  Anything I missed or any questions just askJ.  I don’t really need to sell the Van but as I mentioned could use the room and free time…you don’t find something like this every day and I realize it takes a special (read as a little off…like me lol) person to own something like this…I do guarantee you will enjoy the smiles it brings to faces all around as you drive down the road and the vehicle (paint alone) could not be replicated for even close to what my reserve price is here, which is I think fair.  Custom van’s are making a comeback.

 

 

EXTERIOR –

 

GOOD - The exterior is completely covered in custom airbrushing, it is Star Trek themed in general with a LOT of small images of faces, creatures, etc that seemingly never cease to stop appearing.  Overall the paint itself has held up incredibly (stored indoors).  The vehicle was treated new to the full ‘Zeibart’ rustproofing package and has ZERO rust.  Honestly, the body is in amazingly clean shape.  Zeibart plugged, filled, closed all areas that may have someday allowed water ingress.  Has original custom windshield visor.  Bumpers are in great shape and rust free/pitting free as is custom grill.  Van has a ‘split’ sunroof that does work, though I siliconed it shut as it had a small leak on the drivers side when I wash it.  Still has the original custom thrush sidepipes that sound awesome.

 

BAD - The clearcoat technology in 1980 wasn’t as good as today and it has dried and is peeling in places.  Most notably on the hood and horizontal faces of the fenders.  Also the clear ‘rear arch’ protection is peeling badly.  I thought about wet sanding with 2000 and respraying the clear but got scared to do it myself.  There is a small dent behind the rear wheel on the drivers side which I took a few pics of and should appear in the set.  I didn’t know it was there when I bought it, it isn’t really noticeable but I believe in full disclosure.  The fiberglass fender arches have paint chips and a bit of light rash on some (I didn’t do it).  The thrush pipes should be rechromed at some point…they were pitted and surface rusting in places.  I touched them up with chrome paint but they aren’t perfect.

 

 

 

INTERIOR –

 

GOOD – Two words ‘Red Velvet’.  Diamond quilted red velvet to be exact.  This covers the door panels, wall and ceiling panels, and visor area.  The flooring is red carpeting with thick soft underpadding in rear.  Original red dash and console are crack free and in excellent shape.  Incredibly cool octagonal wood steering wheel. Period correct cassette player and equalizer with power antenna.  All gauges work, wipers work (including intermittent), horn, all lights operational.  Heater works great and is new.  I installed a backup camera to help with parking.  Front captain’s seats are swivel and again covered in quilted red velvet, both have lap belts.  Sliding door actually works.  Currently I have a bench seat with quick release function installed behind the captain’s chairs (for my kids; the original swivel ‘buckets’ did not have seatbelts).  I do have the ‘buckets’ and they will be included as well as the mounting brackets…once again, more red velvet!  There is also a pump sink, icebox, and bed in back with curtains…you guessed it…red velvet.

 

BAD – Drivers door velvet has a small tear.  A few of the upholstery ‘button’ covers are missing, I do have replacements which will be included…I just haven’t had the time to install.  The van was wired up for interior lighting above the rear seating area and in the bed area.  The wiring is still there but the lights are not.  I would want to trace all the wiring and re-set it up and install new lights…but again, I don’t have the time.

 

 

MECHANICAL –

 

GOOD – As mentioned in the description, I have done a lot of work to get this vehicle to meet our strict provincial inspection last year.  As with most vehicles that are stored long-term, I had to refresh some items.  The heater core was removed for some reason so I purchased and installed a new one.  The brake master cylinder was replaced, a new horn was installed, new front ball joints, and the van was tuned up.

 

 

BAD –

 

As far as I know the van needs nothing mechanically done to it right now (according to my mechanic).  It starts, runs, drives fine with no issues and is happy to cruise along at 120km/h (70mph) all day.  I drove it up to Whistler twice last month and had a blast.

 

 

WHEELS/TIRES

 

GOOD – I replaced the tires less than 1000kms (600 mls) ago with period correct BFG T/A’s.  Rears are 245/60/15, fronts are 225/70/15.  Has original Cragar SS wheels.

 

BAD – Cragar SS wheels are pitting/peeling and should be refinished.


All in all this van is in excellent condition, especially considering it was built nearly 35 years ago!  Ready to roll, cruise, holiday, show...whatever you like:).  Please remember your bid is a binding contract, do not bid if you really don't want to own this.  As I mentioned, any questions or more pics...just ask.


Cheers,

Brian

Auto blog

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

Pony-car sales war: Mustang vs. Camaro vs. Challenger [UPDATE]

Fri, Jul 3 2015

Update: An earlier version of this story misstated the 2015 Mustang's weight when compared with previous models. Additionally, we have added comments from Chevrolet in the text. The Ford Mustang has blown past the Chevy Camaro as America's best-selling pony car, and in June, it wasn't even close. The 'Stang outsold the Camaro 11,719 to 8,611 cars. The Camaro remained ahead of the Dodge Challenger, which sold 6,845 units. Even though the Camaro did post an 11.5-percent sales improvement in June, the competition is arguably stronger than at anytime since the 1970s muscle-car era. The Mustang's sales leapt a whopping 53.6 percent, while the Challenger saw a gain of 56 percent. Several factors are weighing down Camaro sales, including its lame duck status. Chevy is launching a new generation of the Camaro this year that's more than 200 pounds lighter, offers a new turbo four-cylinder engine option, and has a nicer interior than the outgoing model. Put simply: wait a few months and you can get a better car. It's also unlikely Chevy will jack up the price much, as it's historically kept the Camaro within reach of everyday enthusiasts. While Chevy fans wait in anticipation for their new sports car, Ford and Dodge have downshifted. The new Mustang, which went on sale last year, is faster and more sophisticated than its predecessor. It also offers a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder, which Ford has credited for the Mustang's recent uptick and makes up 36 percent of the car's sales, Ford analyst Erich Merkle said. View 17 Photos June's performance allowed the Mustang to widen its sales gap with the Camaro this year. Through the first five months, Ford sold 68,290 Mustangs, a 54.4-percent increased compared with 2014. Chevy sold 42,593 Camaros, an 8.7-percent decrease. The Challenger – long the No. 3 pony car in sales volume – has seen its sales surge 41 percent this year to 37,011 units. Spokesman Monte Doran said Chevy expected that 2015 would be a "relatively soft year" for the Camaro. "Mustang is taking advantage of years' worth of pent-up demand for an independent rear suspension," he said. "When Camaro introduced an IRS, in 2009, it helped make us the best-selling performance car in America.

Meet Alex Archer, the engineer behind GM's power-sliding center console

Sat, Feb 15 2020

In 2009, a GM manager complained to a 59-year-old GM technician about the hassle of retrieving items from a pickup truck bed after driving shifted the cargo. In two days, the tech had come up with the ideas that, ten years later, would debut as the MultiPro tailgate. The engineering teams kept the tailgate secret in part by hiding mock-ups in a locked storage closet in GM's Vehicle Engineering Center in Warren Michigan for two years. A piece in the Detroit Free Press reveals that another storage closet in Warren would play the same role in a different cloak-and-dagger operation, this time for the power-sliding center console in GM's new full-sized SUVs. During a meeting in early 2017, bosses gave the job of the console's creation to 24-year-old design release engineer Alex Archer, just two years out of Stanford University with a degree in engineering and product design.  This time, the catalyst for the feature was an internal GM think tank called co:lab, where employees suggest ideas. Execs gave Archer the task because "They needed someone willing to ask a lot of questions," her 36-month mandate to produce a six-way console that could be a standard cubby or a gaping maw able to swallow four gallon jugs or hide a secret compartment. Clearly, she succeeded. It took Archer and the team nine months to devise a prototype, another six months to get the green light for production. As with the tailgate, the team working on the console grew to include designers, production engineers, and suppliers. Archer, now 26, shepherded the process, and her name is on the patent. "It took a ton of people, I'm just somebody who stuck with it the whole time," she said. GM like her work well enough to produce the "Day in the Life" segment above, five months before the world would hear about the console. Archer's path to engineering was as unlikely as getting the job for the console. She had entered Stanford with plans to be a doctor. But an innovation class during her freshman year, and a sophomore summer spent helping her grandfather rebuild a 1937 MG engine recharted her course. Her grandfather told her, "You know, you could be an engineer for a car company." Consumer reaction to Archer's work won't be far off, the SUVs slated to hit dealerships soon. Meanwhile, she's busy on something that could be just as intense as the console: Restoring a 1955 Packard Clipper in her garage. Head to Freep to check out the story of Archer and the console. Related Video: