Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Low Mile 2001 Chevrolet Express Commercial Van. Non Smoker, Woman Owner. on 2040-cars

Year:2001 Mileage:60000
Location:

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

Hello after 35 years in the antique and collectibles business I have finally retired. Now I am selling my business van. This van is lady owned. non smoker and was used for taking collectibles and small furniture to my place of business in Hershey PA from local auctions around Lancaster PA. With 60,XXX miles it is barely broken in. Look at the drivers seat to see how little use this van has had. Most vans have a destroyed drivers seat and smell of cigarette smoke. Not this van!  Purchased from an estate sale in 2005 and only used once a week for deliveries from the auctions to my shop

Could I wash and wax this van and get much more money?  Sure,,,,but I would rather leave the starting price a bit cheaper and start enjoying my retirement that much sooner.  

Use for your business or pick up some rear seats at the junk yard and use the carpool lanes, :-)

Van is located in the zip code 17601 in Lancaster, feel free to contact me for an inspection. Any questions Pattizgl(at)aol(dot)com

Ice cold Air Works great. Drives excellent and ready to work

To give everyone a fair chance I will not end the auction early and will require CLEARED funds in my bank account before releasing van. Cash or bank transfer preferred, checks will be held until funds are cleared in my bank. 

Title in my name in hand. There are no Liens on on this vehicle. 

Van to be paid for and removed within 5 business days. 


Thanks for looking and happy bidding. 


Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Wyoming Valley Kia - New & Used Cars ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 560 Pierce St, Shavertown
Phone: (570) 714-9924

Thomas Honda of Johnstown ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 1920 Bedford St, Beaverdale
Phone: (814) 262-2140

Suder`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 1315 Randall Ave, Wycombe
Phone: (215) 949-1182

Stehm`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1601 Cinnaminson Ave, Andalusia
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Stash Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 939 Boston Hollow Rd, Mckeesport
Phone: (412) 754-1055

Select Exhaust Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 5045 Pottsville Pike, Port-Clinton
Phone: (610) 916-1111

Auto blog

eBay Find of the Day: 1990 Chevy 1500 454 SS with just 7 miles

Sun, Jan 4 2015

When trawling the classifieds either on a buying mission or merely a time-wasting mission, we spend a lot of time poring over photographs comparing the seller's idea of "Like New!" with our idea of it. It's hard to argue with seven original miles on the odometer, though, which is what this 1990 Chevrolet 1500 454 SS has. It's being sold by Country Chevrolet on eBay, the same dealer who sold the truck to its one and only owner 25 years ago. The purchaser bought two of them and left this one in a garage under a car cover, said garage being less than seven miles away from the showroom floor. Better yet, you can buy with confidence because the seller "has collected all records," which we expect would be the slimmest manilla folder in the history of receipt-keeping. For those unfamiliar, the 454 SS was a half-ton, regular cab, 2WD pickup powered by a 454 cubic inch (7.4-liter) V8 with 230 horsepower and 385 pound-feet of torque shifting through a three-speed transmission. This was at the same time the Chevrolet Corvette used a 5.7-liter V8 producing 250 hp and 350 lb-ft. The pickup rode on exclusive wheels and only came in black with red cloth inside. The only extra-cost option on this example is an $18 locking fuel filler cap, which, according to the 454ss forum, means it should have cost about $18,460 out the door, the equivalent of about $34,000 today. At the time of writing there are zero bids, but proceedings open at $45,000 and Country Chevrolet wants $49,000 if you have to have your time capsule right now.

Chevy Volt has worst sales month since August 2011, Nissan Leaf also down

Tue, Feb 3 2015

January is traditionally a time when new car shoppers take a break. For the last few years, if we isolate our focus to just the first two major plug-in cars in the US market, we see that the first month of the year was lower – often dramatically lower – than the 11 that followed. So, when you see the Chevy Volt dropped and Nissan Leaf sales figures for January 2015, don't be too surprised. The Volt sold only 542 units last month, that model's lowest since August 2011. That also represents a 41 percent drop from January 2014, and it reinforces the thought that if anyone out there is interested in a new Volt, they're going to be waiting for the new model to drop later this year. While we do expect sales to climb in February and into spring, we won't be surprised if the general Volt trend remains quiet until the second-generation arrives. On the Leaf side of the ledger, January's low sales numbers were still about twice as high as the Volt's – the Leaf sold 1,070 units last month, the lowest since February 2013 – but it did break a streak for the Japanese automaker. Usually, each month represents at least an increase over the same month a year ago, but that wasn't the case this time. In January 2014, Nissan sold 1,252 Leafs. Still, Brendan Jones, Nissan's director of electric vehicle sales and infrastructure, issued an upbeat statement: "We saw a significant increase in demand in December from Nissan Leaf customers looking to take advantage of federal and state incentives at the end of the tax year, which pulled some sales ahead. We're confident that EV sales will continue to rise over time due to increasing emission regulations and other reasons for purchase of EVs such as lower operating costs, reducing dependence on foreign energy sources, environmental concerns and a great driving experience." The numbers will tell us soon enough. News Source: General Motors, Nissan Green Chevrolet Nissan Electric Hybrid ev sales brendan jones

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.