Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Chevrolet Ss Base on 2040-cars

US $45,413.00
Year:2014 Mileage:3 Color: Phantom Black Metallic
Location:

9673 Kings Auto Mall Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

9673 Kings Auto Mall Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 6G3F15RW3EL966038
Stock Num: 141952
Make: Chevrolet
Model: SS Base
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Phantom Black Metallic
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Audio System Premium Brand Speakers: Bose
  • Audio System Premium Brand: Chevrolet MyLink
  • Automati
  • Auxilliary engine cooler
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Braking Assist
  • Chevrolet MyLink
  • Chrome center console trim
  • Chrome dash trim
  • Chrome door trim
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Daytime running lights
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Driver and passenger heated-cushion
  • driver and passenger heated-seatback
  • Driver and passenger knee airbags
  • Driver seat memory
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Electric power steering
  • Electrochromatic auto-dimming mirrors
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front sport seat
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 14 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 21 mpg
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Interior air filtration
  • Leather/chrome shift knob trim
  • Leather/chrome steering wheel trim
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 4.7 s
  • Memorized Settings for 2 drivers
  • Memorized Settings including door mirror(s)
  • MP3 player
  • Navigation system with voice activation
  • OnStar Directions & Connections
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Polished forged aluminum rims
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear seats center armrest with pass-thru
  • Rear spoiler: Lip
  • Remote engine start
  • Remote power door locks
  • Side airbag
  • Simulated suede/leather seat upholstery
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Stability control
  • Suspension class: Sport
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Total Number of Speakers: 9
  • Trip computer
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheel Diameter: 19
  • Wheel Width: 9
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 3

Auto Services in Ohio

World Import Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2337 26th St NE, Maximo
Phone: (330) 456-3535

Westerville Auto Group ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5309 Westerville RD, Norwich
Phone: (614) 882-4551

W & W Auto Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 5005 Acme Dr # A, Indian-Springs
Phone: (513) 860-9928

Vendetta Towing Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Scrap Metals, Junk Dealers
Address: 275-299 N. Arlington St, Copley
Phone: (330) 752-2886

Van`s Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: Garrettsville

Tri County Tire Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 7511 Jerusalem Rd, Oregon
Phone: (419) 836-7788

Auto blog

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

Even if GM does close all 5 of those plants, it'll still have too many

Wed, Nov 28 2018

DETROIT — General Motors' monumental announcement on Monday that it will close three car assembly plants and two powertrain plants in North America and slash its workforce will only partially close the gap between capacity and demand for the automaker's sedans, according to a Reuters analysis of industry production and capacity data. Sales of traditional passenger cars in North America have been declining for the past six years and are still withering. After GM ends production next year at factories in Michigan, Ohio and Ontario, it will still have four U.S. passenger-car plants — all operating at less than 50 percent of rated capacity, according to figures supplied by LMC Automotive. In comparison, Detroit-based rivals Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will have one car plant each in North America after 2019. The Detroit Three are facing rapidly dwindling demand for traditional passenger cars from U.S. consumers, many of whom have shifted to crossovers and trucks. Passenger cars accounted for 48 percent of retail light-vehicle sales in the United States in 2014, according to market researchers at J.D. Power and Associates. This year, sedans will account for less than a third of light vehicle sales. That shift in turn has left most North American car plants operating far below their rated capacities, while many SUV and truck plants are running on overtime. The collapse in passenger-car demand is a challenge for nearly all automakers in the United States, including Japan's Toyota and Honda, which have the top-selling models in the compact and midsize car segments. Toyota executives said last month they are evaluating the company's U.S. model lineup. But Toyota also plans to build compact Corolla sedans at a new $1.6 billion factory it is building in Alabama with partner Mazda. The obstacles facing GM in its plans to close more auto factories became apparent on Tuesday as U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to block payment of government electric vehicle subsidies to GM. While it is not certain that Trump unilaterally has the power to do that, he made it clear he intends to use his office to pressure the company to keep open a small car plant in Ohio that GM says will stop building vehicles in March.

GM Design shows what could have been and what might be

Thu, May 27 2021

We periodically like to check in with GM Design's Instagram account to see what they're cooking up. Even better is when we catch a glimpse of an alternate history of what legendary designers from The General's past were thinking, though those ideas may not have made it into production. This week, for example, the account posted some illustrations from George Camp, whose career at GM spanned nearly four decades, from 1963 to 2001. One of the renderings is of what appears to be a 1971-72 Pontiac GTO Judge, but with two headlights instead of the production unit's quad beams. The rear departs from the canonical version most dramatically, with a massive integrated wing. Other bits that didn't make the production cut include large side vents, a gill-like side marker and rectangular intakes below the headlights that wouldn't be out of place on a modern design today. Amazingly, from what we can make out of the date, it appears that the drawing was done sometime in 1965, which makes it quite prescient.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) There's also a very aerodynamic interpretation of a Corvette ZR-1. To our eyes it splits the difference between the 1986 Corvette Indy concept and a fourth-generation F-body Pontiac Firebird, so perhaps parts of Camp's work on this sketch did make it into physical form. There's also a radical sports car concept from May 1970 that resembles the Mazda RX-500 concept from the same year, a Syd Mead-looking Cadillac coupe, and an Oldsmobile with a cool take on the company's trademark waterfall grille and elements of the Colonnade Cutlass at the rear. Other recent posts include a FJ Cruiser-like off-road EV, a sleek coupe with the Chevy corporate grille, and a rendering of a Silverado-esque pickup that looks far better than the current production version.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) It's pretty easy to lose hours in the account, but it's always fascinating to see GM's visions of what could have been and what might be. Related Video: