Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Hot Rod Rat Rod Covair on 2040-cars

Year:1963 Mileage:24000 Color: White /
 Black
Location:

West Hempstead, New York, United States

West Hempstead, New York, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:auto
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:two carbs 110 horse
Fuel Type:gas
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 30927W162998
Year: 1963
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Corvair
Trim: monza 900
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: auto
Mileage: 24,000
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

You are bidding on a 1963 Corvair Coupe Monza 900.  It has 24,000 original miles bought in Franklin Square, NY and has never left town.I bought this car from an old man in town.  I don't know if he was the original owner.  It needed a ton of work. Let's start with the moto,r ,new carbs, exhaust dual off a 2013 Victory High Ball motorcycle flaired into the body ,points ,condensor,wires, cap ,rotor ,plugs, belt, gas sending unit ,break line from front to back,.valve cover gaskets, oil pan gasket, push rod tube seals , valve adjustment ,1962 Impala antennas that work, CB, CD  stereo, ipod ready;  built into it an old 60's train travel case that is removable so I didn't deface thew vehicle's dashboard, fog lights, tires are white walls in good condition, the rims are powder coated white, wheel skirts, breezes, a visor modifided to fit from a 1959 Chevy pick up, trunk pan ,floor pans ,new custom crazy carpet;  a custom paint job on the front end done by the Outer Limits Art Studio in Franklin Square NY. The inerior is intact . Plesae look at pics. Tinted windows 35%. There is some rust on the driver's door that need looking after and by the passenger back windshield. But over all the car is solid.  I've been using it as my every day car but it's time for it to go. I don't have anywhere to keep it over the winter and it deserves to be garaged. Ready to drive home ..Please e-mail me with any questions or call 516 652 5139 Bob.  Thanks for looking.

Auto Services in New York

Westchester Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 2167 Central Park Ave, Hastings-On-Hudson
Phone: (914) 779-8700

Vision Dodge Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 920 Panorama Trl S, Union-Hill
Phone: (585) 385-5700

Village Automotive Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Auto Transmission
Address: 61 N Country Rd, Wading-River
Phone: (631) 751-3200

TNT Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 142 Ralph St, Harrison
Phone: (973) 302-4099

Sterling Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1024 W Ridge Rd, North-Greece
Phone: (585) 621-2870

Sencore Enterprises ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 3818 State Route 31, Phelps
Phone: (315) 597-2886

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Next Chevy Silverado could get this built-in tailgate step

Thu, Feb 2 2017

General Motors just received patent approval for a tailgate step in a pickup bed. And given the timing, don't be surprised if you see this on the upcoming 2019 Silverado pickup (not the mention its GMC Sierra twin), expected to arrive in late 2018. According to the patent, granted in December of last year, the whole mechanism is housed in the tailgate assemble. The magic happens when a portion of the top half of the tailgate swings down and a step folds out. There's also a handle that locks into position to help climb up into the bed. As trucks get bigger and taller over the years, it gets harder and harder to access the cargo bed. Ford's solution with the 2009 F-150 was a step that slides out from the end of the tailgate. Back then, Chevy made an ill-advised ad highlighting the feature for Ford. And while Howie Long mocked the F-150's "man step" Ford saw almost a third of its trucks with the option in the first year. The GM design seems to improve on Ford's idea as it appears to be wider and has a back to the lower step. That is, you don't have to worry about stepping through the ladder-rung design as on the F-150. Ford's tailgate step later spread to the F Super Duty, and other cargo access assists have proliferated through the truck world. On the most recent redesign, the Chevrolet Silverado took a trick from the Avalanche and added cutouts to the corners of the rear bumper that act as a foothold. Ford also offers a deployable side step, Chevrolet has running boards that scoot rearward with a kick of the boot, and Ram offers fixed wheel-to-wheel side rails. Nissan is in on the game too, with an optional folding step that tucks under the rear bumper. We don't expect Chevrolet to comment on when or if we'll see this feature in the showrooms. But given that engineers are already hard at work on the next Silverado and the timing of this patent lines right up with the new truck's development cycle, we'll be disappointed if this patent stays in the file cabinet. Related Video:

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.