Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Chevrolet Corvair 95 2.7l on 2040-cars

Year:1964 Mileage:0
Location:

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Auto Services in Utah

Utah Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 7638 S State St # D, West-Jordan
Phone: (801) 352-8468

Utah Valley Tire Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 420 S 500 E, West-Jordan
Phone: (801) 355-8473

Turn Key Service Tech INC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 4701 Commerce Dr, South-Jordan
Phone: (801) 639-9804

Turn Key Service Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 4701 Commerce Dr, North-Salt-Lake
Phone: (801) 639-9804

Sunburst Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Convenience Stores
Address: 1326 E 5600 S, Holladay
Phone: (801) 278-2600

Rocky Mountain Collision of West Valley City ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 2738 Constitution Blvd, West-Valley-City
Phone: (866) 842-6065

Auto blog

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.

GM recalling 250,000 SUVs over door electronics

Mon, 20 Aug 2012

After a door-fire investigation that dates back to February, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has officially announced a recall today that affects around 250,000 General Motors SUVs for a faulty driver's door module. The recall applies to the Buick Rainier, Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Isuzu Ascender and Saab 9-7X from the 2006 and 2007 model years, as well as the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer EXT and GMC Envoy XL for vehicles sold and/or registered in the Snow Belt.
Road salt use in these midwestern and northern states can lead to corrosion of the driver's door module on these GMT360 and GMT370 vehicles, which allows water to come in contact with the circuit board. If shorted out, the vehicle's power door locks and power windows will not work, and could possibly lead to overheating and, in some circumstances, a fire. No official word on how many total vehicles caught on fire, but back in June, 28 fires had been reported to the government agency. A fix for the problem is still being worked out, but all affected vehicle owners will be notified by GM.
Scroll down for the official NHTSA statement.

GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect

Tue, 17 Aug 2010

2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.