Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu on 2040-cars

US $1,000.00
Year:1973 Mileage:53000 Color: Yellow
Location:

Marengo, Illinois, United States

Marengo, Illinois, United States

This is a really nice fully restored 73 Chevelle in EXCELLENT condition .Let me start by saying that this vehicle is in great condition and it runs and looks almost perfect.The exterior of the car has been painted in its original color of Butternut Yellow and it looks great! There is no dents no major scratches and absolutely no rust on this car anywhere.The underside, floors, trunk,hood and all fenders are perfect.The interior has also been completely redone with new seats carpet and door panels.The interior is flawless and it retains its original appearance except for the steering wheel.The engine was rebuilt for more power it has a mild cam that gives it a nice rumble and still hold a good idle.This is not a race car but a good driver that has plenty of power that it was badly missing before the restoration.

Auto Services in Illinois

Webb Chevrolet ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 9440 S Cicero Ave, Mount-Greenwood
Phone: (708) 423-9440

Wally`s Collision Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 10 Lafayette Ct, Downs
Phone: (309) 827-2177

Twin City Upholstery Ltd. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: Sparland
Phone: (309) 533-7959

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 3190 N Aurora Rd, Bristol
Phone: (630) 898-6688

Towing St. Louis ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Shipman
Phone: (636) 728-0033

Suburban Wheel Cover Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Hub Caps, Wheels
Address: 1420 Landmeier Rd, Wheeling
Phone: (847) 920-8934

Auto blog

Camaro spy shots show subtly different grille, front fascia

Sun, 03 Feb 2013

It looks like there some changes in store for the Chevrolet Camaro - the only thing is that we just don't know what Chevy has up its sleeve. Looking at these spy shots, we'd initially be inclined to think that there is just a minor facelift or a new special edition, but upon closer inspection, there are a few oddities about this car that definitely have us intrigued.
The most obvious difference on this prototype is the slightly restyled front fascia with a smaller lower air inlet and the two-bar grille. Then we get to some of the car's mysterious details. For starters, this fascia has the SS vent above the grille, but it looks to be blocked off. Granted this could just be a one-off piece used for testing. What really piqued our interest was at the rear of the car where it has quad exhaust outlets that are used on the ZL1. Could this be the LS7-powered Camaro that we reported on back in December?
At this point, your guess is as good as ours as to what we're looking at here, so let us know in the comments what you think this could be.

Chevy SS prototype spotted wearing Pontiac G8 clothes

Tue, 28 Aug 2012


Do not adjust your computer screen, you are not seeing the rebirth of the Pontiac brand. General Motors has chosen to use a G8 to disguise a test mule for the latest prototype of the forthcoming Chevrolet SS. The G8 was closely related to the Holden Commodore and Vauxhall VXR, the platform upon which the new Chevrolet performance model will be based. It should come as little surprise, then, that GM has opted to use the cladding from the former G8.
Thought the front clip of this mule is pure Pontiac, note the vents immediately behind the front wheel. That is a distinctive design hallmark of the Vauxhall VXR. Also note that this vehicle is right-hand drive, as the Holden and its Chevy counterpart will be very closely related. That likely includes potential drivetrains. The spy photos of this mule also reveal very wide rear tires, and rear wheels that do not match the fronts.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.