2005 Chevrolet Cavalier Coupe 2-door 2.2l W/ Bluetooth Connected Radio on 2040-cars
Portland, Oregon, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.2L 2198CC 134Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Used
Year: 2005
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Cavalier
Trim: Base Coupe 2-Door
Options: Bluetooth Stereo, iPod/Pandora Radio/iHeartRadio Compatible, CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 144,000
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
For Sale: 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2-door coupe w/ manual transmission.
My girlfriend and I just moved to Portland from Illinois and we will only need one car. We also have a newer Honda Accord, so this Cavalier is no longer needed. This car has a clean title, but it has not been registered in Oregon and it has not undergone emissions testing because we planned to sell it once we arrived. The car showed no problems on the 3000+ mile trip and is in good working condition, but it has a few cosmetic flaws which I will list here: Cracked Windshield - the crack goes completely across windshield. The car is certainly drive-able this way, but it isn't pretty. I was quoted $250 in town to fix it, so I've factored that into the price. Gauges: The gauges do not always read the correct values. This is a common problem with cavaliers. I've had three and they have all done this. However, the check engine light is not on. The key is just turned to accessory, so all of the gauges are lit. Paint Chips and Dings - there is a ding in the driver's side door and paint is chipping around the gas door. Also, there is a paint scrape on the rear left bumper. Dash - there are a few small cracks in the dash up close to the windshield. This is common on these cavaliers, but not very noticeable. Back Tint - The back tint is bubbled. It can certainly be removed, but would better to be replaced. Again, this is only cosmetic, but I felt like it should be mentioned. Brake Pads - The brakes were replaced fairly recently, but we did just make a long trip through the mountains and across the midwest, so I assume that it will need new pads soon. Now the good parts: Aftermarket Stereo w/ Bluetooth, USB, and iPod connectivity- I put this stereo in two weeks before we moved, so it is about 2 months old. It works great with my Samsung Galaxy 5 using Spotify over Bluetooth. It also has a port for USB thumb drives or iPod cables, a 1/8 inch audio jack, and supports Pandora radio or IHeartRadio. New stereo was ~$250 New Tires - It has 4 new Goodyear tires w/ ~4000 miles. They were replaced the week before the trip. Newer Fuel Pump - The fuel pump was replaced within the last 2 years. Non-Smoker - The car HAS BEEN SMOKED IN occasionally, but I am not a smoker and the car has been treated to remove any smells. Clean Interior - The interior has been detailed and treated with ozone to remove smells and Folex to remove most stains. However, its got 9 years of wear on it so you will see minor scratches and a small rip in the driver seat in the typical places. Thanks for looking, Zephad |
Chevrolet Cavalier for Sale
2001 chevrolet cavalier base * very low miles * 1 owner * adult driven with care(US $2,395.00)
2002 chevrolet cavalier great commuter(US $3,995.00)
A 1989 classic chevy cavalier z24 convertible
1989 cavalier z24 convertible 3.1 auto w/ extra low mileage engine trans & parts
2003 chevrolet cavalier base coupe 2-door 2.2l - good running car at great price(US $1,249.00)
2.2l 4 speakers am/fm radio air conditioning rear window defroster tachometer(US $4,799.00)
Auto Services in Oregon
Vic Alfonso Cadillac ★★★★★
T. B`s Oak Park Automotive ★★★★★
Sun Automotive ★★★★★
Seaport Auto Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
Schuck`s Auto Supply ★★★★★
Save On Tires ★★★★★
Auto blog
Pony-car sales war: Mustang vs. Camaro vs. Challenger [UPDATE]
Fri, Jul 3 2015Update: An earlier version of this story misstated the 2015 Mustang's weight when compared with previous models. Additionally, we have added comments from Chevrolet in the text. The Ford Mustang has blown past the Chevy Camaro as America's best-selling pony car, and in June, it wasn't even close. The 'Stang outsold the Camaro 11,719 to 8,611 cars. The Camaro remained ahead of the Dodge Challenger, which sold 6,845 units. Even though the Camaro did post an 11.5-percent sales improvement in June, the competition is arguably stronger than at anytime since the 1970s muscle-car era. The Mustang's sales leapt a whopping 53.6 percent, while the Challenger saw a gain of 56 percent. Several factors are weighing down Camaro sales, including its lame duck status. Chevy is launching a new generation of the Camaro this year that's more than 200 pounds lighter, offers a new turbo four-cylinder engine option, and has a nicer interior than the outgoing model. Put simply: wait a few months and you can get a better car. It's also unlikely Chevy will jack up the price much, as it's historically kept the Camaro within reach of everyday enthusiasts. While Chevy fans wait in anticipation for their new sports car, Ford and Dodge have downshifted. The new Mustang, which went on sale last year, is faster and more sophisticated than its predecessor. It also offers a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder, which Ford has credited for the Mustang's recent uptick and makes up 36 percent of the car's sales, Ford analyst Erich Merkle said. View 17 Photos June's performance allowed the Mustang to widen its sales gap with the Camaro this year. Through the first five months, Ford sold 68,290 Mustangs, a 54.4-percent increased compared with 2014. Chevy sold 42,593 Camaros, an 8.7-percent decrease. The Challenger – long the No. 3 pony car in sales volume – has seen its sales surge 41 percent this year to 37,011 units. Spokesman Monte Doran said Chevy expected that 2015 would be a "relatively soft year" for the Camaro. "Mustang is taking advantage of years' worth of pent-up demand for an independent rear suspension," he said. "When Camaro introduced an IRS, in 2009, it helped make us the best-selling performance car in America.
Looking back at the Citation IV concept that likely shaped the GM EV1
Wed, Aug 20 2014Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it. We're not sure how that applies to the GM EV1, but we'd still like to share something from Autoline Daily, an online automotive new show with our friend John McElroy. He's been covering the business for decades now and recently found something interesting: pictures of the 1984 Chevrolet Citation IV concept, seen above. Displayed half a decade before the first electric concept that would become the EV1 (inset), McElroy says it's now clear that the elegant, aerodynamic EV1 took a lot of styling cues from the Citation IV, which was developed in part thanks to GM's new-at-the-time Aerodynamics Laboratory. We agree with him that the spats over the rear wheels, the flush glass, and the covered headlights all bear a certain kind of similarity between the two cars. That the colors almost match is a nice coincidence. The Impact (the concept version of the EV1) looked "frumpier," McElroy says, because it wasn't as long as the Citation. You can read a lot more about the Citation IV here and check out McElroy's thoughts in the video below. Find the Citation starting at around 3:45. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.306 s, 7821 u