Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1991 Chevrolet Caprice Base Sedan 4-door 5.0l on 2040-cars

US $3,999.00
Year:1991 Mileage:67203
Location:

Highspire, Pennsylvania, United States

Highspire, Pennsylvania, United States

We have a rare find in this 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Sedan, Red Metallic, Red Cloth Interior, 5.0L EFI, Automatic Transmission w OD, Air Conditioning, Power Steering, Power Brakes, Tilt Steering, Cruise Control, Power Windows, Power Door Locks, AM.FM Radio-Factory, This particular sedan has the base Caprice package, with fullsize hubcaps and radial tires.  Well nice condition, runs and drives quite well, and very respectable overall condition.

ONLY 67,203 MILES!!!   Must See!

Priced to sell for $3999.

RK Motor Company
647 Second Street  Route 230
Highspire PA 17034
717.939.8700

We are located right in front of Harrisburg International Airport (HIA)


Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 111 S Bolmar St, Thornton
Phone: (610) 431-2053

West Shore Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 736 State St, Carlisle-Barracks
Phone: (717) 730-7060

Village Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 52 Rocky Grove Ave, Oil-City
Phone: (814) 432-4509

Ulrich Sales & Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4340 Morgantown Rd, Isabella
Phone: (610) 856-7050

Trust Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 1422 Trindle Rd Ste C, Plainfield
Phone: (717) 249-2667

Steve`s Auto Body & Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 115 Valley View Dr, Marwood
Phone: (724) 763-1333

Auto blog

Watch this creative way to pull a truck's engine

Fri, 08 Mar 2013

Living in an apartment complex has its benefits, but for shade-tree mechanics who like/need to work on their own cars, it definitely has a number of disadvantages. Relatively simple tasks such as brake jobs and oil changes are difficult when you don't have dedicated driveway space, to say nothing of more in-depth repairs... like pulling an engine, for example.
For these types of challenges, a little ingenuity and plenty of muscle are needed to get the job done. Scroll down to watch these four men snatch the V8 out of a Chevrolet K1500 using nothing but a chain, landscape timber and good ol' fashioned brute strength. Good work, gentlemen.

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.