1974 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Convertible 2-door 6.6l on 2040-cars
Holiday, Florida, United States
74 CAPRICE CONV CAR NOT IN REAL BAD SHAPE HAS SOME MINOR RUST LOWER PART SEE PHOTOS 400SB 2BL CARB RUNS GREAT MOTOR REBUILT ABOUT 27.000 MILES AGO 400 TRANS SHIFTS GREAT,A/C ALL THEAR NEEDS V.I.R VALVE, TOP NOT RIPED NO HOLES,NEEDS TO BE LUBED FROM SITTING TIRES LOOK GOOD HAVE FLAT SPOTS FROM SITING BUT ARE GETING BETTER FROM DRIVEING, CAR WAS PARKEDFOR 10YEARS CLEANED GAS TANK FLUSHED LINES BATTARY IT STARTED RT UP CHAGEE\D OIL AND FILTER, RUNS AND DRIVES GREAT, CAR NEEDS A GOOD CLEANING DIRTY FROM SITTING, THE BAD IT WILL NEED A TRUNK PAN FOUND 3 ON LINE FROM $300 TO 500, NEEDS ALL 4 OUTER BUMPER FILLERS ON E BAY FROM $70.00 ALL 4 TO $230.00 ALL 4 WHEATHERSTRIPING,CAR WAS PAINTED NEEDS IT AGAIN 25YR AGO BUMPERS NOT BAD ALL MOULDINGS GOOD, BUT CLEAN IT, DRIVE IT ALL SUMMER, REDO IT NEXT WINTER, THIS CAR HAS BEEN AROUND ME FROM 1982 I DO NO THE CAR, SEATS NOT RIPED DASH PAD IS CRACKED ON E-BAY 105.00 YOU CAN CALL ME @(727) 849-2439 I CAN TELL YOU ANYTHING YOU WANT TO KNOW IT DOES RUN SHIFT AND RIDE VERY GOOD EVAN WITH OLD TIRES, THANKS DENNIS
|
Chevrolet Caprice for Sale
- 1979 chevrolet caprice classic sedan 4-door 5.0l(US $2,500.00)
- 1996 chevy caprice wagon** impala ss clone** low miles/right colors(US $8,995.00)
- 1991 chevrolet caprice base sedan 4-door 5.0l
- 1975 caprice classic convertable 454 original big block 51k original miles
- 1992 chevrolet caprice classic ltz sedan 4-door 5.7l(US $9,000.00)
- 1984 chevrolet caprice classic sedan 4-door 5.0l
Auto Services in Florida
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
World Of Auto Tinting Inc ★★★★★
Wilson Bimmer Repair ★★★★★
Willy`s Paint And Body Shop Of Miami Inc ★★★★★
William Wade Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wheel Innovations & Wheel Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA approves hybrid rearview mirror display in Cadillac CT6, Bolt EV
Tue, Feb 23 2016The Chevy Bolt EV prototype doesn't just have a fancy new all-electric powertrain. Just outside the driver's line of sight is a newfangled rearview mirror, one that can turn into a screen that shows a moving image from the rear-facing camera. Speaking to NPR's Robert Siegel yesterday, Department of Transportation secretary Anthony Foxx said that NHTSA has now approved this type of mirror/screen for use in vehicles. According to a letter from NHTSA to General Motors, GM will likely use this Full Display Mirror first in the 2016 Cadillac CT6 before coming to the Bolt. In its letter to GM, NHTSA said that the Full Display Mirror will only qualify as a standard rearview mirror as long as there are normal side mirrors in place. In other words, don't expect to see cameras and screens replacing all the mirrors in a motor vehicle just yet. @AutoblogGreen @NPR - #NHTSA has OK'd GM rear-view system that can switch between mirror & camera views. pic.twitter.com/6CBeIit10v — Anthony Foxx (@SecretaryFoxx) February 22, 2016 The Full Display Mirror was developed by Gentex, which has long worked with GM. The FDM debuted in 2014 and some people hoped it would also make its way into the Tesla Model X. Gentex, which also makes auto-dimming mirrors, says that it has "set out to develop the technologies and core competencies necessary to manage this evolution of the rearview mirror." The Chevy Bolt EV will start at $37,500, before incentives. The 200-mile EV will go into production late this year for likely sale in early 2017. Related Video:
This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location
Thu, Apr 28 2016Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.
Vert-A-Pac train cars kept your Chevy Vega's price in check
Fri, 01 Mar 2013Our apologies to those who've seen this before, but for the rest of the class, how awesome are these pictures of the Vert-A-Pac shipping system General Motors came up with to ship the Chevrolet Vega back in the 1970s? Developed along with Southern Pacific Railroad, GM was able to double the amount of Vega models it could ship by packing them into the unique storage cars vertically.
At the time, rail cars could fit 15 vehicles each, but Chevrolet was able to lower shipping costs by making it possible to ship 30 Vegas per rail car, in turn allowing the price of the Vega to remain as low as possible. Each rail car had 30 doors that would fold down so that a Vega could be strapped on, and then a forklift would come along and lift the door into place. All the cars were positioned nose down, and since they were shipped with all of their required fluids, certain aspects had to be designed specifically for this type of shipping, including an oil baffle in the engine, a special battery and even a repositioned windshield washer reservoir. See for yourself in our image gallery above.