1967 Camaro Pro Street on 2040-cars
Soddy Daisy, Tennessee, United States
Engine:496 BBC STROKER
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:owner
Exterior Color: Hotrod Black
Make: Chevrolet
Interior Color: Black and gray
Model: Camaro
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: 2 Door
Warranty: none
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 100,000
1967 CHEVROLET CAMARO PRO STREET: 496 BBC STROKER, EAGLE ROTATING ASSEMBLEY, MERLIN STEEL HEADS, HARLAND SHARP ROLLER ROCKERS, 850 HOLLEY, MSD IGNITION, HOOKER HEADERS, 3 IN. EXHAUST, FLOW MASTERS, TURBO 350 TRANS., FORD 9 INCH, 10 GAL. FUEL CELL, BRAIDED LINES, HURST QUARTER STICK SHIFTER, AUTO METER GAUGES, NEW TIRES, NEW FRONT ROTORS AND BRAKES, NEW VALVE COVERS, NEW TAYLOR PRO WIRES, NEW 100 AMP ALTERNATOR, 4 INCH FIBER GLASS LIFT OFF HOOD, DUEL BATTERIES, HAVE LOT MORE NEW PARTS NOT ON CAR. NEW WIRING HARNESS, NEW LOCKS, NEW ARM REST, NEW 4 INCH STEEL COWL HOOD WITH HINGES AND LATCHES, NEW FRONT BUMPER WITH NEW BRACKETS AND BOLTS, NEW WHEEL LUG NUTS, NEW 4 POINT HARNESS SEATBELTS, NEW TRANSMISSION COOLER, NEW 15 GAL. FUEL CELL, NEW FILLER NECK, CALL FOR MORE INFORMATION OR EMAIL 423-598-8006 OR 423-451-0848....LARRY
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
Chevrolet camaro v8 6.2 liter 2 ss 22" wheels 2010 rallye racing stripes 10 2ss(US $26,995.00)
1969 camaro ss tribute 350/auto turbo 350 frame off restoration
Black 2010 chevrolet camaro ss 6-spd moonroof 1-owner accident free low miles!(US $27,990.00)
1987 chevrolet iroc z28, 305 tuned-port fuel injection engine
Z28 t-tops leather 1 owner 77,093 miles
1979 chevrolet camaro z28 coupe 2-door
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wheeler`s Automotive ★★★★★
Wayne`s Radiator Service ★★★★★
Watson Auto Sales West ★★★★★
Universal Kia Franklin ★★★★★
The Automotive Solution ★★★★★
Taylor Tom Chevrolet-Pontiac-Oldsmobile Truck-Chrysler Plymouth-Dodge-Jeep ★★★★★
Auto blog
AWD turbodiesel Equinox, Terrain dropped for 2020
Thu, May 2 2019Citing low demand, General Motors is dropping the AWD diesel options off the Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain roster. Chevrolet spokesman Kevin Kelly confirmed to CarsDirect that for 2020, the diesel versions of these SUVs will only be offered with front-wheel-drive. CarsDirect notes that with the AWD diesel Equinox and Terrain gone, the only AWD diesel option in this class is the Mazda CX-5 Skyactiv diesel, which is significantly more expensive: As the AWD diesel CX-5 is only available in a fully loaded Signature specification, the $42,045 price tag is almost $10k heftier than the cheapest comparable Equinox, the AWD 1.6-liter diesel LT which starts from $32,495. The 2019 GMC Terrain AWD SLE costs $34,795 in comparison, which works out to being around $7,200 cheaper than the Mazda. The higher trim levels for the Equinox and Terrain are Premier and SLT, respectively. Some reasoning behind the AWD diesel GM SUV's low uptake is their own price difference to base FWD gasoline models: you can get a 1.5-liter Equinox for less than §25,000 listed. While the 2.2-liter Mazda has plenty more power at 168 hp and 290 lb-ft, compared to 137hp and 240 lb-ft in the 1.6-liter GM SUVs, the Equinox and Terrain are notably more frugal – they are rated 32mpg combined, while the Mazda can manage 28 mpg. With better fuel economy and a significantly lower list price, the General Motors twins are at least more wallet-friendly when it comes to numbers, and as the vehicles will cease to be built in that configuration there's likely to be some cash on the hood on ones in stock. News Source: CarsDirectImage Credit: Chevrolet Chevrolet GM GMC confirmed gmc terrain chevrolet equinox
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
GM executive chief EV engineer says reducing cost of plug-in vehicles is 'huge priority'
Mon, Mar 17 2014As we know, another major automaker investing heavily in electrified vehicles is General Motors, and it's doing things much differently than rivals BMW, Ford or Nissan. The Chevrolet Volt extended-range EV is a modest seller at its $35,000 sticker price but a huge hit with owners. The Chevy Spark BEV, still in limited availability, puts smiley faces on its owners and drivers. The just-introduced Cadillac ELR, a sharp-looking, fun-driving $76,000 luxocoupe take on the Volt's EREV mechanicals, has admittedly low sales expectations. With this interesting trio in showrooms and much more in the works, the third vehicle electrification leader I collared for an interview at Detroit's North American International Auto Show (see #1 and #2) was Pam Fletcher, GM's executive chief engineer, Electrified Vehicles. ABG: Why do your EREVs need four-cylinder power to extend their range when BMW's i3 makes do with an optional 650 cc two-banger? "We designed [the Volt and the ELR] to go anywhere, any time" - Pam Fletcher PF: I get that question all the time: why not something smaller? You don't really need that much. You use the electric to its ability, then you just need to limp. But we designed those cars to go anywhere, any time, and we don't want their performance to be compromised. If you're driving through the mountains, we don't want you to be crawling up grades, or to be limited on any terrain. So it's optimized to be able to travel literally the biggest grades and mountain roads around the globe at posted speeds. Because what if you can't? Another good reason: when the engine is on, you have to run it wide open throttle, max speed, most of the time. And while we can do a lot with acoustics, and the ELR has active noise cancelation, a small-displacement, low cylinder-count engine at high speed, high load all the time isn't something you want to live with. That's how we came up with the balance we did among the key factors of performance, NVH [noise, vibration and harshness] and range. ABG: Where you go from here? Is the range-extender engine due for an update? PF: We know and love the current Volt, and there is still a lot of acclaim about it, so we think it's a good recipe. But we are heavily in the midst of engineering the next-generation car, which I think everyone will love and be excited about.