2000 Chevrolet K3500 Ls Crew Cab Pickup 4-door 7.4l 4x4 Lifted Custom Dually on 2040-cars
Coweta, Oklahoma, United States
2000 Dually 4x4 Crew Cab 7.4L Big Block Fuel Injected ONLY 2,300 Miles Since TOTAL Rebuild Automatic Transmission Rebuilt Transfer Case Rebuilt Rebuilt Front End, Hubs, Seals etc. ALL New Air Conditioning System BLOWS COLD AND HARD ALL New Suspension and Lift (Independent front end Rides Smooth) ALL New Beautiful Paint only 2 months Old New Rhino Bed Liner (Bed Floor Great Shape) 4 New Baja Claw Radial Tires (315/75/16) ALL New Power Windows and Locks Leather Interior, Back Seat Great Shape, Front's are Showing Wear New CD/Stereo This is a Super Nice Dually, Over $30,000 Invested. It Drive's and Stops Like it Should, No Road Walk. It was built to haul a 24' Enclosed Race Car Trailer. Mechanically This Truck is in Excellent Shape. The Paint was Professionally Done and It Show's it was Painted May 31st this Year. This truck is a pavement Queen, Has not Been Off Road Since Rebuild. Listed Above are the Major Components That Have Been Rebuilt/New or Replaced. There are numerous upgrades that are not listed. Please Call, Text or Email with Questions. Darren 918-521-4311 |
Chevrolet C/K Pickup 3500 for Sale
2006 chevrolet silverado 3500 dually crew cab 4x4 only 30,000 miles(US $20,900.00)
1997 chevrolet 3500 truck diesel dual wheels highway miles no reserve !
One 1 owner low miles 42k 5.7l crew cab automatic hard canopy bed liner tow pkg
2000 chevrolet k3500 base standard cab pickup 2-door 5.7l
1995 chevrolet 3500 turbo diesel dually under 100,000 miles(US $5,000.00)
1985 chevy 3+3 crew cab 4 door 6.2l diesel automatic 2wd silverado big bad truck
Auto Services in Oklahoma
Wayne Moores A Plus Auto Collision ★★★★★
Tulsa Truck Works ★★★★★
Tire One ★★★★★
Southside Transmission ★★★★★
Smiley`s Tire Tunes & Tint ★★★★★
Rick Huber Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Autoblog's top 50 car photos of 2016
Fri, Dec 30 2016This one shouldn't need much explanation. We like cars a whole lot, and that includes not just driving them but taking great pictures of them. We've collected our 50 favorite images from this year in the mega-gallery above. It's a mix of old and new, with a healthy dose of vintage and modern race cars mixed in, and not one single shot under the harsh lights of an auto show. So click through and enjoy. Featured Gallery Autoblog's Top 50 Photos of 2016 View 50 Photos Image Credit: Copyright 2016 Autoblog.com Audi BMW Chevrolet Dodge Ferrari Ford Lamborghini Mazda McLaren Mercedes-Benz Porsche Rolls-Royce Volvo Convertible Coupe Motorcycle Luxury Racing Vehicles Performance Supercars Classics
GM slashes prices in China as sales falter
Thu, May 14 2015Buying a vehicle from General Motors' stable of brands might be a lot cheaper in the near future – at least for customers in China. The effort comes as GM hopes to keep sales there growing, and the decision alludes to yet another sign that the Asian country no longer has the booming auto market of past years. GM and its Chinese joint venture partner SAIC are slashing prices by as much as the equivalent to $8,700 on 40 models from Buick, Chevrolet, and Cadillac, according to The Detroit News. Across all of automaker's nameplates, the overall sales dipped in China in April by 0.4 percent to 258,484 vehicles. Among the drops, Buick was down 8.5 percent, and Chevy shrunk 5.6 percent. Caddy's numbers increased 4.6 percent for the month, though. Buick remains a popular brand in the minds of Chinese consumers, but according to The Detroit News domestic automakers there are starting to eat into the dominance of foreign companies in the market. The country remains important for GM, though. Late last year, it outlined a future strategy that included China as a major pillar, including a $14 billion investment to build five new factories and boost sales. News Source: The Detroit NewsImage Credit: Alexander F. Yuan / AP Photo Buick Cadillac Chevrolet GM Car Buying Car Dealers saic
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.