Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Chevy C3500h Rack Body Truck on 2040-cars

US $4,800.00
Year:1999 Mileage:45336 Color: RED /
 Gray
Location:

Tewksbury, Massachusetts, United States

Tewksbury, Massachusetts, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:RACK BODY
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:7.4 LITER 454 CU. IN.
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1GBKC34J6XF000648 Year: 1999
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C/K Pickup 3500
Trim: RACK BODY
Drive Type: AUTO WITH DUAL WHEELS
Mileage: 45,336
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: RED
Warranty: NONE
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"THIS TRUCK IS IN GOOD CONDITION. IT DOES HAVE THREE CHIPS IN THE WINDSHIELD BUT WILL PASS INSPECTION. THE PASSENGER DOOR HAS TWO SCRACHES,THE FRONT GRILL IS CRACKED FROM HITTING SOMETHING, THE FUEL DOES NOT PUMP FROM THE REAR TANK TO THE FRONT TANK. ( I THINK THE PROBLEM IS THE TRANSFER PUMP).AND IT HAS A SMALL DENT ON LEFT SIDE OF HOOD NEAR WINDSHIELD. OVER ALL THE TRUCK IS IN GOOD CONDITION."

THIS WAS MY COMPANY TRUCK. MY COMPANY BOUGHT IT BRAND NEW IN 99. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN GARAGED. ONLY TWO PEOPLE EVER DROVE IT.IT IS A C3500H RACK BODY. IT ONLY HAS 45000 MILES. IT IS A 454 AUTO WITH DUAL WHEELS IN THE REAR.IT ALSO HAS DUAL FUEL TANKS. THE TRUCK RUNS EXCELLENT WITH NO LEAKS OF ANY FLUIDS. OVERALL I FEEL THIS TRUCK IS IN GOOD SHAPE AND WILL LAST QUITE AWHILE FOR THE NEXT OWNER.

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Westgate Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 98 Westgate Dr, Westwood
Phone: (888) 603-6146

Wellesley Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 965 Worcester St, Uphams-Corner
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tufankjian Toyota of Braintree ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 210 Union St, Jamaica-Plain
Phone: (781) 848-9300

Tint King Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting
Address: West-Wareham
Phone: (978) 670-2927

South Shore Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 359 Washington St, Minot
Phone: (781) 337-3916

South Shore Auto Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 27 Robert J Way Ste 2, West-Wareham
Phone: (508) 732-0472

Auto blog

Smaller Cars Endure Big Problems On Crash Test

Wed, Jan 22 2014

In a crash test of 11 of the smallest cars on the market, only one vehicle received an acceptable rating. The rest received marginal or poor ratings in the study, providing evidence that supports a widely held notion that smaller cars are among the least safe on the road. No other vehicle group has performed as poorly on a new crash test than these mini cars, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the nonprofit group that conducted the testing. The latest results of which were released Wednesday. The Chevrolet Spark was the only car earning an overall "acceptable" rating on the small-front overlap test, and even that vehicle had its shortcomings, IIHS said. "Small lightweight vehicles have an inherent safety disadvantage," said Joe Nolan, the senior vice president for vehicle research at IIHS. "That's why it's even more important to choose one with the best occupant protection. Unfortunately, as a group, minicars aren't performing as well as other vehicle categories." The Mazda2, Kia Rio, Toyota Yaris and certain Ford Fiesta models all received "marginal" overall grades on the test, while the Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, Toyota Prius C, Hyundai Accent, Fiat 500 and Honda Fit all earned "poor" ratings. Results from these sub-compact cars fare much worse than vehicles sized just a little bit bigger, IIHS said. Among 17 cars evaluated in the small category, five earned "good" ratings and five more earned "acceptable." Only introduced a year ago, the small-front overlap test has quickly become a key indicator of differences in automotive safety. IIHS introduced it as a way to replicate what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with a tree or utility pole at 40 miles per hour. In the real world, these sorts of accidents are more dangerous than others, in part because they bypass the front-end crush zones on most cars. TOP 5Most Researched Sedans 2013 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,680 2013 Hyundai Sonata MSRP : $20,895 2013 Nissan Altima MSRP : $21,760 2014 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,955 2013 Toyota Corolla MSRP : $16,230 Automakers have been rushing to make design changes to the front ends of their cars. Without a grade of acceptable or better, they cannot qualify for the IIHS' overall Top Safety Pick+ honor, given annually to the safest models on the market.

Chevy Volt owners log half a billion electric miles, 2015 production starts

Thu, Jun 19 2014

As General Motors gets ready to start 2015 Volt production Monday, Chevrolet is looking back at some of the numbers that got the car to where it is today. The headline number is that Volt owners have collectively put more than a half-billion electric miles on their cars. The unsurprising upshot is that, if you went out and bought a Volt, you're pretty keen on getting as many electric miles out of it as possible. 90 percent of all Volt trips are done purely on electric power. The typical Volt driver goes 970 miles between fill-ups, GM says, and that means that 63 percent of all miles are done on battery power. General Motors executive director Larry Nitz gave AutoblogGreen a few more details on the usage habits of Volt drivers, including that 81 percent of commuting miles are electric. Two-thirds of US Volt drivers charge their vehicle 1.4 times a day, a clear indicator of drivers trying to maximize electric miles through opportunity charging. In fact, Nitz said, 90 percent of all Volt trips are done purely on electric power. GM also says that the Volt's official 35 miles of electric range is still doable for many owners who have had their car for more than 30 months. Looking ahead, we know that one upgrade for the 2015 Volt will be 4G LTE connectivity that can turn the car, like others in the GM family, into a mobile wifi hotspot. We're of course much more interested in when GM is finally going to start production of the next-gen Volt, but GM officials would only tell us that they're very excited about the still-secret vehicle, promising we'll be learning more "soon." Nitz did confirm that today's Volt drivers are most interested in three things from the next-gen model: more range, a lower price and a fifth seat. He did not say whether or not GM will be able to deliver on those requests. Chevrolet Volt Owners Surpass Half a Billion Electric Miles After 30 months of use, a sampling of Volts shows consistent all-electric range 2014-06-19 DETROIT – Since its launch in late 2010, Chevrolet Volt owners have accumulated more than half a billion all-electric miles. Additionally, based on a General Motors' study of more than 300 Volts in service in California for more than 30 months, many owners are exceeding the EPA-rated label of 35 miles of EV range per full charge, with about 15 percent surpassing 40 miles of range.

GM issues stop-sale for 3 SUVs over incorrect MPG rating

Fri, May 13 2016

This week, GM sent a memo to Chevy, GMC, and Buick dealers to tell them to stop selling three SUVS. The 2016 Chevy Traverse, the GMC Acadia, and the Buick Enclave all have EPA window stickers that show higher fuel economy ratings than the vehicles actually have. Unlike other recent – and very public – fuel economy ratings problems from VW and Mitsubishi, it doesn't seem like GM did anything wrong with the testing for these vehicles, it just misprinted the labels. New labels are being printed and should arrive at dealerships this weekend and early next week. After that, the SUVs will be able to be sold and delivered again. The official fuel economy rating for the three SUVs are all the same. The correct numbers for the all-wheel drive versions are 17 miles per gallon combined, 15 city, and 22 highway. The stickers say the SUVs get 17/24/19. The front-wheel driver models were also incorrectly labeled, and the total number of affected vehicles is 59,823. In the memo, GM said the problem was caused by an "inadvertent error," Automotive News says. GM is working with the EPA to solve the issue. We have asked GM for a comment on the mistake and will update this post if we hear back. Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Automotive News – sub. req. Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GM GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse