Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Chevy C10 1964 on 2040-cars

US $17,000.00
Year:1964 Mileage:74692 Color: Blue /
 Brown
Location:

Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States

Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:standard cab
Engine:6 cyclinder
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 4c144h167663 Year: 1964
Interior Color: Brown
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C-10
Trim: standard
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: two wheel drive
Options: CD Player
Mileage: 74,692
Exterior Color: Blue
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"has a few scratches in the paint and fading of the chrome."

1964 Chevy C10, Coker White walls Coker Smoothie Rims and center caps. Engine is 6 cylinder. The truck has a very nice wood bed. Kenwood CD player with blue tooth hook up chrome is in great condition. Transmission has two speed power glide. Restoration was done on the truck about 3 years ago. I do not have any information on the actual mileage or paper work for the restoration. The truck is a 8 to 9 out of 10.  Not to much to talk about other than its a very nice truck fun to drive no AC by the way so it gets a little hot in the summer time.  Feel free to contact me through eBay's email with further questions.

Auto Services in North Carolina

Window Genie ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Pressure Washing Equipment & Services
Address: 5300 Atlantic Ave, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 745-8048

West Lee St Tire And Automotive Service Center Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 W Lee St, Oak-Ridge
Phone: (336) 272-8616

Upstate Auto and Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 2040 Victory Trail Rd, Earl
Phone: (864) 487-9272

United Transmissions Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Towing
Address: 2615 Battleground Ave, Summerfield
Phone: (336) 288-3317

Total Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 413 Chatham St, Mamers
Phone: (919) 774-7509

Supreme Lube & Svc Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 13715 Nc 50 Hwy N, Benson
Phone: (919) 207-0085

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

GM Design shows what could have been and what might be

Thu, May 27 2021

We periodically like to check in with GM Design's Instagram account to see what they're cooking up. Even better is when we catch a glimpse of an alternate history of what legendary designers from The General's past were thinking, though those ideas may not have made it into production. This week, for example, the account posted some illustrations from George Camp, whose career at GM spanned nearly four decades, from 1963 to 2001. One of the renderings is of what appears to be a 1971-72 Pontiac GTO Judge, but with two headlights instead of the production unit's quad beams. The rear departs from the canonical version most dramatically, with a massive integrated wing. Other bits that didn't make the production cut include large side vents, a gill-like side marker and rectangular intakes below the headlights that wouldn't be out of place on a modern design today. Amazingly, from what we can make out of the date, it appears that the drawing was done sometime in 1965, which makes it quite prescient.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) There's also a very aerodynamic interpretation of a Corvette ZR-1. To our eyes it splits the difference between the 1986 Corvette Indy concept and a fourth-generation F-body Pontiac Firebird, so perhaps parts of Camp's work on this sketch did make it into physical form. There's also a radical sports car concept from May 1970 that resembles the Mazda RX-500 concept from the same year, a Syd Mead-looking Cadillac coupe, and an Oldsmobile with a cool take on the company's trademark waterfall grille and elements of the Colonnade Cutlass at the rear. Other recent posts include a FJ Cruiser-like off-road EV, a sleek coupe with the Chevy corporate grille, and a rendering of a Silverado-esque pickup that looks far better than the current production version.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) It's pretty easy to lose hours in the account, but it's always fascinating to see GM's visions of what could have been and what might be. Related Video:

Chevrolet Malibu gets across-the-board price cuts, hopes to dig out of slump

Mon, 11 Feb 2013

To say that things aren't going well for the newly redesigned 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is a pretty sizable understatement. Reports have been swirling about the Malibu getting an emergency design refresh, less than a year after its introduction, as well as having its production at the Fairfax Assembly Plant halted twice already this year for excessive inventory. Now, Motor Trend is reporting that the midsize sedan will be receiving price drops across the board ranging from $300 on a number of models up to $770 on the 1LT trim; offsetting some of MSRP drop, though, the destination charge has increased from $760 to $810.
Without destination, the entry-level Malibu LS now starts at $21,995, which is still about $300 more than a Honda Accord and about $300 less than the segment's top-selling Toyota Camry. This new pricing also drops the price of the Eco, 2LT and 3LT trims by $300. The LTZ trim has dropped by $415, meaning that the Malibu's top dog now starts at just under $30,000, excluding destination.
Here are the new starting prices for all eight of the Malibu trim levels compared to the previous prices for the 2013 model year (including destination):