Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Chevrolet Short Bed Pickup on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:132882 Color: MAROON /
 MAROON
Location:

Springfield, Pennsylvania, United States

Springfield, Pennsylvania, United States
Transmission:350 AUTO
Body Type:SHORT BED PICKUP
Engine:350 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: CE148J154555 Year: 1968
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C-10
Trim: Custom
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): DELUXE
Drive Type: 350 V8 350 AUTO TRANS
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 132,882
Sub Model: CUSTOM
Exterior Color: MAROON
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: MAROON
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

For sale is a 1968 Custom cab short bed fleetside pickup. List of new items include: 350 engine, 350 trans, rear axels, front power disc brakes, rotors, wheel bearings, power brake booster , master cylinder  ,shocks  drive shaft and joints, ft and rear coil springs, new radiator, Vintaqe heat/ a/c, new HEI distributor, starter , fuel pump, water pump , alternator all belts and hoses motor and trans mounts all new 2 1/2 inch exhaust , dyna flow mufflers, Locar shifter, 4 new Coker wide white radial tires, 4 new torque thrust american racing wheels, dropped ft spindles, new saginaw power steering box, retro radio,. Everything on this drive train is either new or reconditioned. The body is excellent  in regards to dents and rust. There are only 3 areas I could find with rust and I've included photo's in picts, very minor repair. Chrome trim has some dents but are all there. Interior dash pad is original and in excellent shape. Seat has small burn hole, left side sun visor damaged. Paint appears to have been repainted once the original color but needs to be stripped and done againThe pickup bed was cut down from 8 foot to 6 foot but was done by a professional skilled sheet metal person. This truck would be an easy cosmetic restoration . All glass  and glass seals are in good condition .   Cam shaft is 480 lift hydraulic , 600 holly carb. There won't be any regrets with this truck so good luck bidding and thank you for looking. Call with any questions Tom 610-656-9028  or home 610-543-1101, NO TEXTING thank you. PS this truck came from Arizona  reason for minor rust.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Wrek Room ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 717 Brownsville Rd, Boston
Phone: (412) 381-5190

Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Auto Transmission
Address: Donegal
Phone: (412) 923-3219

Warren Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 108 W 12th St, Fairview
Phone: (814) 459-1476

Ultimate Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting, Towing
Address: 100 S Main St, Loganville
Phone: (717) 292-6060

Ulrich Sales & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4340 Morgantown Rd, Narvon
Phone: (610) 856-7050

Tower Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 200 Freeport Rd, Creighton
Phone: (412) 828-6202

Auto blog

Buick takes top spot in 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study

Tue, Jun 28 2022

People, economies, and supply chains weren't the only things continuing to get sick over the past year. The 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) is out, showing the average rate of problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) during the first 90 days of ownership increased overall. The average figure for the 32 ranked manufacturers in 2020 was about 166 problems per 100 vehicles. In the 2021 IQS, that dropped to an average of 162. This year, the average jumps to 180 problems. J.D. Power says that figure is a record high over the 36-year history of the study. Buick leapt to the top of the rankings this year with the fewest issues, at 139 problems per 100 vehicles in the first 100 days of ownership. After Dodge became the first American automaker to lead the IQS in 2020, followed by Ram in 2021, this year marks a three-peat for U.S. carmakers. Dodge took second this year at 143 PP100, Chevrolet third with 147 PP100, Genesis the first luxury maker on the chart in fourth with 156 PP100. Between February and May, this year's study gathered responses to 223 questions from more than 84,000 new 2022-model-year car owners and lessees. The questions are designed to zero in on real-world problems new owners encounter with nine categories of vehicle features: Infotainment; features, controls and displays; exterior; driving assistance; interior; powertrain; seats; driving experience; and climate. As has been the case in the past few year, infotainment has proved to be the most problematic bugbear making scores worse. Considering features individually, six of 10 of the worst problem areas dealt with infotainment, causing infotainment's score of 45 PP100 to be 19.5 PP100 worse than the second-placed feature. Consumers ranked getting Android Auto and Apple CarPlay to connect reliably as the most troublesome.  GM didn't just score with Buick, which was one of only nine of the 33 ranked brands to show improvement this year. The conglomerate earned first place with the fewest PP100 among all the automaker groups, and scored the most model-level awards with nine, ahead of BMW with eight and Hyundai Group with three.  This year's study again showed a gap between luxury and mass-market makers, thought to be down to the amount of tech in luxury vehicles that consumers aren't properly informed about or that doesn't act as expected — that latter issue exacerbated by the chip shortage.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.

GM’s Charlie Wilson was right: Stronger regulations can help U.S. automakers

Fri, Oct 26 2018

Charlie Wilson had been the president and CEO of General Motors before being nominated to become secretary of defense by Dwight Eisenhower. During his Senate confirmation hearings, he controversially said, "For years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors, and vice versa." And he was right. While car companies aren't necessarily the most progressive when it comes to things that might have the slightest possibility of political blowback, General Motors should be credited for doing something absolutely forthright in this regard with its announcement that it wants the federal U.S. government not to squash the California Air Resources Board's emissions requirements but to actually create a 50-state "National Zero Emissions Vehicle" program that, in the words of Mark Reuss, executive vice president and president, Global Product Group and Cadillac, "will drive the scale and infrastructure investments needed to allow the U.S. to lead the way to a zero emission future." Filing comments to the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks is one thing. But a graphic the company developed for this announcement — shown above — is something else entirely, something that is absolutely credible, creative and clever. There is a photo of a Chevrolet Bolt EV driving along a highway, which seems to be in Marin County (based on the blurred San Francisco skyline in the background). Text on the photo states: "It's Time for American Leadership in Zero Emissions Vehicles." It seems to say, in effect, "If we want to make America great again, then we're going to do it by leading in technology, not by retreating behind weakened regulations." General Motors understands that the auto market is globally competitive, and if U.S.-based companies are going to be in the game, then they'd better be able to out-innovate the companies based elsewhere, where emissions and economy standards are not being weakened. What's good for our country ... Related Video: