Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1965 Chevy C10 Pickup, Very Straight 99% Rust Free Hot Rod on 2040-cars

Year:1965 Mileage:35507 Color: of the pickup only has small dings and scratches and would qualify as a good daily driver quality
Location:

Baker City, Oregon, United States

Baker City, Oregon, United States
Advertising:

Please read entire listing and description.

 Up for auction is this 1965 Chevrolet C10 long bed pickup. This C10 is very nice with a straight clean body and very little rust, only one spot as seen in the photos. It has 35,507 miles on the odometer, which I'm sure is 135,507. This pickup runs and drives great! It idles nicely or can easily cruise at freeway speeds of 65mph++. It drives straight down the road and stops straight and easy with the addition of power brakes!

THE EXTERIOR of the pickup only has small dings and scratches and would qualify as a good daily driver quality. All door, hood, and tailgate latches work well and as they should. All exterior lights work, (headlights, blinkers, brakes..) The tail gate chain latches have been deleted and it has latches on the inside of the bed. The wood of the bed is solid, but not original. The Tires have approximately 1,000 miles on them and a full size spare tire is included. It also has a locking fuel cap. Unfortunately I DO NOT have the keys for the door locks.


THE INTERIOR has black carpet in good condition with a 60/40 spit bench seat that is fully adjustable. The drivers side seat has a few small cracks in the upholstery but is still very comfortable.All windows roll up and down easily and work good. It is equipped with a working AM/FM Cassette radio. The heater blows hard and warm even in the winter and the windshield wipers work too. The speedometer/odometer/oil pressure/Alternator/and temperature gauges all work too, but the temperature gauge is aftermarket. Even the horn works!


THE UNDERCARRIAGE is very clean and rust free. Under the engine is a little oily.


UNDER THE HOOD the inline 6 engine starts and runs great every time even in cold temperatures. It also has power brakes installed that work great. Around 1,000 miles ago the front and rear brake shoes, wheel cylinders, and front wheel bearings were replaced.

It has the following NEW parts installed:

Air Cleaner
Spark Plugs
Spark Plug Wires
Ignition Points
Ignition Condensor
Distributor Cap
Distributor Rotor
PCV Valve
Fuel Pump
Valve Cover Gasket
Exhaust Gaskets
Ignition Lock Cylinder and Switch


This pickup is set at a LOW RESERVE and is ready for summertime cruising and enjoyment, or a good solid candidate to build to your liking! I have tried to describe this pickup to the best of my knowledge as shown in the pictures and description above of any imperfections the truck may have. Please keep in mind this is an older pickup and is not in perfect condition, but this 1965 C10 is still very nice for almost 50 years old! If you have any questions, please feel free to message me and I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks for looking and good luck!

Buyer is responsible for shipping arrangements or local pick-up of the vehicle





Auto Services in Oregon

Vic Alfonso Cadillac ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 633 NE 12th Ave, Oak-Grove
Phone: (503) 233-6451

T. B`s Oak Park Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 4335 Silverton Rd NE, Amity
Phone: (503) 585-6445

Sun Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 391 Rustic Pl, Cheshire
Phone: (541) 344-2219

Seaport Auto Wholesale Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 17225 SE McLoughlin Blvd, Troutdale
Phone: (503) 653-7400

Schuck`s Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 3340 NE 3rd Ave, Happy-Valley
Phone: (360) 335-1512

Save On Tires ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 14529 SW 72nd Ave, Tualatin
Phone: (503) 608-7230

Auto blog

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.

Cars with the most reckless drivers are full of surprises

Wed, Oct 13 2021

Insurify is a site for comparing auto insurance quotes. Because insurance shoppers need to submit information like the vehicles they're driving and the infractions they've compiled while driving those vehicles, Insurify has quite the database of correlations tying certain models to a habit of breaking certain laws. When the site's data analysts decided to compile a list of the top ten models for reckless driving citations in the decade from 2010 to 2019, the ranking contained a few wild entries. The Dodge Challenger making the countdown will surprise precisely zero people. But the Saturn L200? First, a definition: USLegal.com defines reckless driving as "driving with a willful or wanton disregard for safety. It is the operation of an automobile under such circumstances and in such a manner as to show a willful or reckless disregard of consequences." So this list is a caution about particular drivers more than the cars. For a baseline, according to Insurify data, for any random model, 15 out of 10,000 people who drive that model have picked up one citation for reckless driving. Back to that Challenger, then. No shocker for being here, but it's actually number 10, with 44 out of 10,000 Challenger drivers nabbed for a willful disregard of consequences on the road. That's better than the first surprise entry, the Saturn L200, a sedan only on sale for six years, with the least horsepower on the list, and out of production since 2005. The data set put drivers of GM's extraterrestrial sedan at 45 reckless pilots per 10,000 drivers. There are two pickups on the list, the only modern one being the Ram 1500 at eighth, with a rate of 46 in 10,000. Somehow, drivers of the third-best-selling pickup in the U.S. outrun the overwhelming numerical superiority of the best-selling vehicle in the States, the Ford F-150. The other pickup is the Chevrolet K1500 at number five, with a rate of 56 in 10,000. This is not only the oldest vehicle on the list, it went out of production in 2002, before any other vehicle on the list. Between the trucks, the Volkswagen CC slotted in at seven with 47 in 10,000 reckless driving chits, the Cadillac ATS slipped into sixth with 48 in 10,000.  The top four is a bag of unexpected. The Nissan 370Z is the first hardcore sports car on the list at number four, with 61 in 10,000 Z drivers flaunting their Fairladys in the face of Johnny Law.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.