1961 Chevy Bel Air 2 Dr. Sedan on 2040-cars
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:235 ci
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:3 speed manual
Model: Bel Air/150/210
Trim: 2 dr. Sedan
Exterior Color: Black with Green Top
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Turquoise
Drive Type: 2 wheel drive
Number of Cylinders: 6
Mileage: 99,999
1961 Chevy Bel Air 2 dr. Sedan. Got car in a trade. Recent restoration. Straight body painted black with green top. Trim appears to have been polished and straight. Bumpers could use a rechrome, they are straight and dent free. Good for a driver. Turquoise interior with new seat covers, headliner, carpet and package tray. Door panels and kick panels also appear new. Car has Corvette rally wheels with Mickey Thompson red line tires. Car is very well detailed. During restoration front passenger floorboard was replaced. All lights and gauges work. As does wipers and heater. Rear tail lights have been converted to LED. Cars only needs are radio, it does not work and needs a speedometer cable (it jumps).
Car has a 235 ci 6 cyl. with a 3 speed column shift trans. Previous owner told me drivetrain has never been out of car. Engine upgrades include HEI dist., power steering and altenator.
Asking 17,300.00 OBO will also entertain trades for a 1968 -77 Ford Bronco.
Shipping is buyers responsibility. Car is listed locally so auction can be ended at anytime.
E-mail or call 269-366-2475 with any questions.
Chevrolet Bel Air/150/210 for Sale
- 1954 chevy chevrolet bel air hot rod 396 big block antique extras no reserve(US $14,000.00)
- 1952 chevy tudor deluxe hardtop belair(US $14,000.00)
- 1960 chevrolet bel air custom rat rod-350 crate motor-strong runner!!
- 1956 bel air - resto mod - hot rod - classic cruiser!-
- 1962 belair hot rat rod air suspension airride 283 v8 powerglide
- 1956 chevrolet bel air base hardtop 2-door 4.3l(US $11,000.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Zaharion Automotive ★★★★★
Woodland-Kawkawlin Trailers ★★★★★
W L Frazier Trucking ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Urka Auto Center ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM is the latest automaker accused of diesel emissions cheating
Thu, May 25 2017Volkswagen and Ram need to make room on the diesel-emissions bench for General Motors. America's largest automaker was accused in a lawsuit on Thursday of rigging hundreds of thousands of diesel trucks with at least three so-called defeat devices to ensure that the trucks would meet federal and state emission standards, even if they generated more pollution in real-world driving. According to the complaint, on-road emissions testing conducted for the plaintiffs found that Duramax-equipped trucks produced NOx pollutants, comprised of nitrogen and oxygen atoms, two to five times higher than legally permitted, and "many times" higher than their gasoline counterparts. The proposed class-action lawsuit was filed in federal court in Detroit on behalf of people who own or lease more than 705,000 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup trucks fitted with "Duramax" engines from 2011 to 2016 model years. The lawsuit seeks remedies including possible refunds or restitution for lost vehicle value, plus punitive damages. It adds to legal problems for Detroit-based GM, which has already paid about $2.5 billion in penalties and settlements over faulty ignition switches linked to 124 deaths. GM joins at least five automakers whose diesel emissions have been scrutinized by regulators or consumers. They include VW, which has admitted to cheating; Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Peugeot and Renault. GM spokesman Dan Flores called the claims "baseless," and said the trucks comply with US Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards and California's own tough standards. Shares of GM were down 69 cents, or 2.1 percent, at $32.50 in afternoon trading, after earlier falling to $31.93. The GM lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, which helped reach multibillion-dollar settlements with VW on behalf of drivers and dealers. The case is Fenner et al v General Motors LLC et al, US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, No. 17-11661. The named plaintiffs are Andrei Fenner of Mountain View, California and Joshua Herman of Sulphur, Louisiana. They said they would not have bought their respective 2011 Sierra and 2016 Silverado trucks, or would have paid less for them, had they known about the alleged rigging. Joseph Spak, an RBC Capital Markets analyst, in a research report said "negative publicity" from the lawsuit could drive buyers to trucks from Ford or even Fiat Chrysler's Ram.
Who sold the most heavy-duty pickups in 2012? PickupTrucks.com investigates
Tue, 26 Feb 2013Domestic manufacturers enjoyed a good year for heavy-duty pickup sales in 2012. PickupTrucks.com has taken a close look at exactly how those sales broke down between each manufacturer and between three-quarter and one-ton pickups. Ford sold some 67,786 F-250 Super Duty models last year with the Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD falling just behind at 56,359 units. The Ram 2500 HD came in third at 41,918, while the GMC Sierra 2500 HD earned itself fourth place with 27,616 deliveries. While Ford held onto the top spot in the one-ton market, Ram easily nailed down second place by selling more 3500 HD models last year than General Motors sold Silverado 3500 HD and Sierra 3500 HD trucks combined.
So, did GM manage to sell more trucks than Ford with its two brands? Very nearly. Ford sold a total of 119,338 heavy-duty pickups to GM's 111,555. Ram, meanwhile, moved a distant 77,583. But perhaps more interesting is the diesel take rate in this segment. PickupTrucks.com says 80 percent of all domestic one-ton trucks roll from the dealer lot with a turbo-diesel under the hood. Head over to the site for a closer look at the breakdown.
GM recalls Cadillac ATS and Chevy Impala for separate issues
Fri, Feb 27 2015The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration added two recalls from General Motors in the government organization's daily update of safety campaigns. Both were for failing to meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards but for completely separate reasons. The larger recall covers 58,698 units of the 2013-2015 Cadillac ATS, but it doesn't really carry huge safety concerns. In vehicles produced between April 25, 2012, and February 9, 2015, the controls for the tilt and slide of the moonroof are not recessed enough, as required by federal law. According to NHTSA, it's possible that someone could inadvertently activate the auto-close for the roof panel, which the agency claims increases "the risk of personal injury." Dealers will install a new trim plate that will add the necessary clearance. The other campaign covers 1,177 examples of the 2014 Chevrolet Impala from between November 15, 2012, and May 27, 2014. However, this is actually a repeat of a previous recall on the Chevy and the Cadillac XTS from 2014. The affected Impalas here "were remedied incorrectly" under the earlier campaign, according to NHTSA. On these sedans, it's possible the electronic parking brake might not fully disengage and still remain in some contact with the rotor, which is in violation of federal rules. The fault can cause excessive heat from the brakes that could potentially lead to a fire, according to NHTSA. To fix the problem, dealers will reprogram the electronic parking brake control module. Show full PR text RECALL Subject : Inadvertent Press of Roof Panel Switch/FMVSS 118 Report Receipt Date: FEB 24, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V106000 Component(s): VISIBILITY Potential Number of Units Affected: 58,698 All Products Associated with this Recall Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) CADILLAC ATS 2013-2015 Details Manufacturer: General Motors LLC SUMMARY: General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013-2015 Cadillac ATS vehicles manufactured April 25, 2012, to February 9, 2015. In the affected vehicles, the power-operated roof panels auto-close when the non-recessed "Slide" or "Tilt" switches are pressed. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No.