Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1953 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe $31,900 on 2040-cars

US $31,900.00
Year:1953 Mileage:20000 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Enoch, Utah, United States

Enoch, Utah, United States
1953 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe $31,900, US $31,900.00, image 1
Advertising:

PRESENTED BY CLASSIC CARS CONNECT!
1953 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe $31,900 USD
Location: Enoch UT USA 84721
Contact: Richard (435)-632-8287

Show quality 53' Bel Air for sale!! No corners have been cut on the build for this car. The engine is a 350 swapped out of a Chevy Suburban and fully rebuilt with 20 thousand current miles on it. The transmission is a 350 turbo automatic, 2 door vehicle, 2 wheel drive. Dark blue exterior with silver top and silver ghost flames, blue cloth interior.

8 out of 10 condition, power 6-way seats, power steering and drum brakes. CD player, AM/FM radio, heater, well maintained, and always garage kept. The car was painted approximately 5 years ago, owned for 38 years, West Coast car with ZERO rust. Comes with an Edelbrock 4 barrel carburetor, and a Nova subframe.

Comes with a clean title, fully insured and ready for test drives. Owner restored, electric wipers, tilt column steering, ready to hit the road, show quality, and trophy winning vehicle. Brand new aluminum radiator. Brakes, chrome, and tires are in great shape. Nova rear end, 1955 Chevy headlights, heavy duty torsen bar, 1957 Buick grill, 70' Monte Carlo taillights.

The hood is a one piece with rounded corners, molded grill shell, dual exhaust, bench seats, hood and trunks shaved, new door locks, custom license plate frames, air shocks on the rear for comfort driving, and trunk has been fully reupholstered.

Please call Richard at the phone number above to ask questions, see the car, or to make an offer. No reasonable offer shall be refused and thanks for looking.

Auto Services in Utah

Wrenches ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 445 E State Rd, Pleasant-Grove
Phone: (801) 785-6769

Tunex Orem ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 184 S State St, Vineyard
Phone: (801) 874-2395

Terrace Muffler & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engines-Diesel-Fuel Injection Parts & Service, Engines-Diesel
Address: 140 W 4700 S, Riverdale
Phone: (801) 675-4266

Ted`s Express Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6930 S 400 W, West-Jordan
Phone: (801) 561-6727

Rocky Mountain Collision and Auto Painting ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 695 West State Road, Pleasant-Grove
Phone: (801) 785-2020

Rick Warner Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 28 W 700 S, Salt-Lake-Cty
Phone: (801) 363-4400

Auto blog

Motor Trend wheels the 2015 Corvette Z06

Tue, Nov 25 2014

The new Chevrolet Corvette Z06 is capable of some absolutely wild metrics. Want proof? Carlos Lago from Motor Trend is here to break it all down. 60 miles per hour? 3.2 seconds. 60 to 0? 91 feet. Lateral acceleration? A staggering 1.16g, a figure that is the highest MT has ever recorded for a vehicle that isn't a race car. It's an utterly astonishing piece of work, this Z06, and just when you think it can't possibly get any more impressive, Randy Pobst hustles an auto-equipped Z06 around Road Atlanta in just 1:30. Aside from the eight-speed auto, Pobst's Z06 had the most aggressive aerodynamic package, the so-called Stage III. Take a look at the 650-horsepower Z06 in Motor Trend's latest video.

How real is the Chevy Bolt EV and will it really cost $30,000?

Tue, Jan 13 2015

"This is us bragging that we can do this kind of car." That's how Michael Simcoe, GM's executive director for NA exteriors, described the Chevy Bolt EV concept, which made a surprise appearance at the Detroit Auto Show today. While there was talk of a 2017 production debut, this is for sure a concept vehicle. But that means the ideas behind the vehicle are perhaps more important than the details. For example, no one is talking about what size battery might appear in a production Bolt, but Simcoe would talk about how rapid progress in battery improvements made it possible for GM to make the bold Bolt declaration that promises 200 miles and a price tag of around $30,000 (after incentives). But if the Bolt makes it to market, it won't be until 2017 (as rumored) or later, is it really fair to promote the car as being available with a federal tax credit? For one thing, credits for plug-in vehicles may change in the next few years, but if the laws stay the same, each manufacturer is limited to 200,000 vehicles before the credits start to decline. GM is justifiably proud that it's sold over 70,000 Volts thus far, but with a new model coming out later this year and a few years to go until the Bolt potentially arrives, GM could be pushing right up against that 200,000 limit when the Bolt goes on sale. But Volt executive chief engineer Pam Fletcher told AutoblogGreen that, "We're just trying to take some of the confusion out." "Think about talking to the average consumer," she said. "First, going through the explanation of how the federal tax credit was set up, how it's being used and so on. [In the industry, we] have the luxury of understanding the nuances of that regulation, but right now people who aren't in the marketplace, they don't have the luxury of all that. It's already hard to communicate the details so we gave them data in a way that is what they're used to seeing." There was one question that drove the two-year Bolt gestation and design period, Simcoe said: What does a better battery offer a vehicle designer? "We've got a number of spaces we play in for powertrain technology and obviously electrification is one of them," he said. "With Volt 1 and then the Spark EV, with that development and batteries getting better for us, we started doing some practical packaging to deliver a vehicle which was not the traditional aero form which you see around electric vehicles.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.